Some people have responded like the 15 players I listed can't touch Perk's jock (pure homerism at its finest). See, I guess that's where we differ. I would gladly take any of those 15 guys, instead of Perk.
The whole post was based on how Perk has very, very limited skills. (Sure, Perk dominates his role, just like Fisher dominates his role on the Lakers). But that doesn't mean he is a good center. He is a solid role player at best. All 15 of the players I listed have a better skill set than Perk. If you cannot see that, then I don't know what you're watching.
If you think Perk is a beast on this team, do you have any idea how big of a beast Andrew Bogut would be here? How about Brook Lopez or Joakim Noah or Chris Kaman? Perk just isn't as skilled as any of those guys (including the other guys from the 15), no matter how you slice it.
Look at it this way. If perk was playing for the Kings or the Nets or the Knicks, do you think he would still be the same "beast?" No. He would just be a simple role player.