Author Topic: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28  (Read 125395 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #150 on: December 29, 2009, 12:02:51 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
I can't help repeat myself. How the hell does a team get up 18 points on the Warriors and blow that lead in 14 minutes? It is just unbelievable. I can understand this happening to bad teams, but the Celtics.

Our backup sf is Brian Scalabrine and our starter is Tony Allen. That's how. Also, as a handicapper, GSW isn't a team you fade at home.

I would much rather see Bill Walker on the court than an out-of-shape guy who can't grab a rebound or do anything on offense.

Our backup sf does not have to be Brian Scalabrine. It is just Doc's stubborn ways that makes that so. As for GS, they are 8-21 and either 5-8 or 5-9 at home. No excuses.
Would you be so kind as to explain this. Exactly who is supposed to be this team's backup SF when Daniels and Pierce are injured?

I would much rather see Bill Walker on the court than an out-of-shape guy who can't grab a rebound or do anything on offense.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #151 on: December 29, 2009, 12:03:22 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
I can't help repeat myself. How the hell does a team get up 18 points on the Warriors and blow that lead in 14 minutes? It is just unbelievable. I can understand this happening to bad teams, but the Celtics.

Our backup sf is Brian Scalabrine and our starter is Tony Allen. That's how. Also, as a handicapper, GSW isn't a team you fade at home.

Our backup sf does not have to be Brian Scalabrine. It is just Doc's stubborn ways that makes that so. As for GS, they are 8-21 and either 5-8 or 5-9 at home. No excuses.
Would you be so kind as to explain this. Exactly who is supposed to be this team's backup SF when Daniels and Pierce are injured?

I personally would like to give Billy a look.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #152 on: December 29, 2009, 12:05:01 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Bears and Vikings in OT.



thanks, forgot that was on

Bears win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #153 on: December 29, 2009, 12:06:03 AM »

Offline ChainSmokingLikeDino

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1422
  • Tommy Points: 96
Bears and Vikings in OT.



thanks, forgot that was on

Bears win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)

Adrian Peterson fumblitis strikes again.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #154 on: December 29, 2009, 12:06:28 AM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Agree with the "put Billy in at backup sf" camp.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #155 on: December 29, 2009, 12:07:20 AM »

Offline greenhead85

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 783
  • Tommy Points: 36
I can't help repeat myself. How the hell does a team get up 18 points on the Warriors and blow that lead in 14 minutes? It is just unbelievable. I can understand this happening to bad teams, but the Celtics.

Our backup sf is Brian Scalabrine and our starter is Tony Allen. That's how. Also, as a handicapper, GSW isn't a team you fade at home.

Our backup sf does not have to be Brian Scalabrine. It is just Doc's stubborn ways that makes that so. As for GS, they are 8-21 and either 5-8 or 5-9 at home. No excuses.
Would you be so kind as to explain this. Exactly who is supposed to be this team's backup SF when Daniels and Pierce are injured?

I personally would like to give Billy a look.

Yeah, it's got to be Bill.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #156 on: December 29, 2009, 12:08:54 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Don Nelson is a HOF head coach. I love how he started his hot lineup at the start of this half. Doc could learn from this.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #157 on: December 29, 2009, 12:09:01 AM »

Offline scoop

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 663
  • Tommy Points: 74
Walker didn't look a NBA player in the D-League.

So far this season, the Warriors get 20.3% of the available boards in the offensive glass.

So far tonight, they got 11 out of 33.

This is, by far, the biggest problem of this team.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #158 on: December 29, 2009, 12:09:16 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
I can't help repeat myself. How the hell does a team get up 18 points on the Warriors and blow that lead in 14 minutes? It is just unbelievable. I can understand this happening to bad teams, but the Celtics.

Our backup sf is Brian Scalabrine and our starter is Tony Allen. That's how. Also, as a handicapper, GSW isn't a team you fade at home.

I would much rather see Bill Walker on the court than an out-of-shape guy who can't grab a rebound or do anything on offense.

Our backup sf does not have to be Brian Scalabrine. It is just Doc's stubborn ways that makes that so. As for GS, they are 8-21 and either 5-8 or 5-9 at home. No excuses.
Would you be so kind as to explain this. Exactly who is supposed to be this team's backup SF when Daniels and Pierce are injured?

I would much rather see Bill Walker on the court than an out-of-shape guy who can't grab a rebound or do anything on offense.

That's where we differ. Walker is useless defensively and clueless offensively. Scal maybe be low on NBA talent but he is a competent perimeter defender of less athletic SFs and mobile PFs and he knows where he's supposed to be and what to do on offense, even if he doesn't do it well sometimes.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #159 on: December 29, 2009, 12:11:52 AM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
I want Randolph...

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #160 on: December 29, 2009, 12:12:01 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Warriors are just begging the C's to blow them out of the building right now and they can't do it. Pathetic six minutes of offense by both teams.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #161 on: December 29, 2009, 12:12:56 AM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
I want Randolph...

Their sights are on Amare and we have Scal...

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #162 on: December 29, 2009, 12:14:21 AM »

Offline Thruthelookingglass

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • Tommy Points: 133
Bears and Vikings in OT.



thanks, forgot that was on

Bears win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)

I just switched over from the football game, and I am wondering where our passing has gone???   ???

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #163 on: December 29, 2009, 12:14:45 AM »

Offline greenhead85

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 783
  • Tommy Points: 36
I can't help repeat myself. How the hell does a team get up 18 points on the Warriors and blow that lead in 14 minutes? It is just unbelievable. I can understand this happening to bad teams, but the Celtics.

Our backup sf is Brian Scalabrine and our starter is Tony Allen. That's how. Also, as a handicapper, GSW isn't a team you fade at home.

I would much rather see Bill Walker on the court than an out-of-shape guy who can't grab a rebound or do anything on offense.

Our backup sf does not have to be Brian Scalabrine. It is just Doc's stubborn ways that makes that so. As for GS, they are 8-21 and either 5-8 or 5-9 at home. No excuses.
Would you be so kind as to explain this. Exactly who is supposed to be this team's backup SF when Daniels and Pierce are injured?

I would much rather see Bill Walker on the court than an out-of-shape guy who can't grab a rebound or do anything on offense.

That's where we differ. Walker is useless defensively and clueless offensively. Scal maybe be low on NBA talent but he is a competent perimeter defender of less athletic SFs and mobile PFs and he knows where he's supposed to be and what to do on offense, even if he doesn't do it well sometimes.

Then Scal is not a shooting forward, just a plain forward by your description. Bill IS a SF.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #164 on: December 29, 2009, 12:15:42 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Someone is going to have to explain that offensive foul on Rondo to me. I can't see that that can be called an offensive foul at all. That just might be one of the worst fouls I have ever seen called.