Author Topic: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28  (Read 124975 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #180 on: December 29, 2009, 12:23:41 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Just got home and turned the game on -- unfortunately it's exactly what I thought after last nights collapse.  C's would lose another big lead and be in a tight game against a horrible team.  

Listening to some excuses people make on here I had to go check some stats.  The C's are missing Paul Pierce but still have 4 starters from their 2008 Title team, and 3 possible All Stars including 2 future Hall of Famers on the floor.  They are playing an 8-21 team that is one of the worst in the NBA even worse than the Clippers.

Their are simply no excuses to be once again struggling against the dregs of the NBA but here the C's are fighting for their lives tonight...

I would say The Warriors are better than their record. They have some guys who can play. Ellis, Randolph obviously. Radmanovic, Turiaf is a good hustle player, Watson can D up as being seen tonight. Not Mikki Moore.

Of course they are better than their record. That makes it easier to swallow if the C's lose to an 8-21 team.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #181 on: December 29, 2009, 12:23:55 AM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
No Call!

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #182 on: December 29, 2009, 12:23:59 AM »

Offline mzepol

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 308
  • Tommy Points: 56
TA is stinking it up tonight with his TOs.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #183 on: December 29, 2009, 12:24:06 AM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
Just got home and turned the game on -- unfortunately it's exactly what I thought after last nights collapse.  C's would lose another big lead and be in a tight game against a horrible team.  

Listening to some excuses people make on here I had to go check some stats.  The C's are missing Paul Pierce but still have 4 starters from their 2008 Title team, and 3 possible All Stars including 2 future Hall of Famers on the floor.  They are playing an 8-21 team that is one of the worst in the NBA even worse than the Clippers.

Their are simply no excuses to be once again struggling against the dregs of the NBA but here the C's are fighting for their lives tonight...

Not a fan of the negativity, but KG is nowhere near healthy right now and Paul Pierce was the Finals MVP.

Well I guess it's just a matter of perspective.  Injuries happen in the NBA.  If you don't feel the C's are capable of beating the NBA's worst teams without being at full strength then that's OK.   I don't think most people would agree with that however.  Remember these are the 8-21 Warriors geez

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #184 on: December 29, 2009, 12:24:06 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Although the KG match-up was good; did we have to run the same play 15 times in a row?
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #185 on: December 29, 2009, 12:25:15 AM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
That's been happing all night and finally a call!

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #186 on: December 29, 2009, 12:25:23 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Hey, cheer up everyone. The C's only have 18 turnovers tonight. UNREAL.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #187 on: December 29, 2009, 12:26:03 AM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
TA is stinking it up tonight with his TOs.

The TEAM is stinking it up tonight with THEIR TOs.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #188 on: December 29, 2009, 12:26:50 AM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
lol! We're down 5! (thought I'd mention it)

Sorry you are staying up so late to see this mess.  Hope they get it going again quickly.

That's alright. Rondo is about to turn it on. Don't worry buddy, we're not losing this one.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #189 on: December 29, 2009, 12:27:19 AM »

Offline MattG12

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3638
  • Tommy Points: 997
  • PEACE
Warriors, Bucks, Suns... to the trivia question? Probably not, but it sounds right to me.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #190 on: December 29, 2009, 12:27:23 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Most glaring stat when I look at the boxscore: Eddie House is a -17 in 9 minutes.

Eddie is in. :P
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #191 on: December 29, 2009, 12:27:32 AM »

Offline ChainSmokingLikeDino

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1422
  • Tommy Points: 96
Just got home and turned the game on -- unfortunately it's exactly what I thought after last nights collapse.  C's would lose another big lead and be in a tight game against a horrible team.  

Listening to some excuses people make on here I had to go check some stats.  The C's are missing Paul Pierce but still have 4 starters from their 2008 Title team, and 3 possible All Stars including 2 future Hall of Famers on the floor.  They are playing an 8-21 team that is one of the worst in the NBA even worse than the Clippers.

Their are simply no excuses to be once again struggling against the dregs of the NBA but here the C's are fighting for their lives tonight...

I would say The Warriors are better than their record. They have some guys who can play. Ellis, Randolph obviously. Radmanovic, Turiaf is a good hustle player, Watson can D up as being seen tonight. Not Mikki Moore.

Of course they are better than their record. That makes it easier to swallow if the C's lose to an 8-21 team.

I didn't say that as simply a teaspoon of sugar to help the medicine go down. Have you watched them play this year? They have some good players and in a Nelson system there are always players who outplay their averages on any given night. They have a few legit scorers, D-stoppers, role players that can shine. Watching them this year they have played much better than their record has shown.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #192 on: December 29, 2009, 12:27:36 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Er, make that 19 turnovers. Wonder what the C's record is for a game?

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #193 on: December 29, 2009, 12:27:51 AM »

Offline BigBaby

  • Kristaps Porzingis
  • Posts: 182
  • Tommy Points: 9
seems like were getting the calls. hopefully we can pull it off.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #194 on: December 29, 2009, 12:28:57 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Just got home and turned the game on -- unfortunately it's exactly what I thought after last nights collapse.  C's would lose another big lead and be in a tight game against a horrible team.  

Listening to some excuses people make on here I had to go check some stats.  The C's are missing Paul Pierce but still have 4 starters from their 2008 Title team, and 3 possible All Stars including 2 future Hall of Famers on the floor.  They are playing an 8-21 team that is one of the worst in the NBA even worse than the Clippers.

Their are simply no excuses to be once again struggling against the dregs of the NBA but here the C's are fighting for their lives tonight...

I would say The Warriors are better than their record. They have some guys who can play. Ellis, Randolph obviously. Radmanovic, Turiaf is a good hustle player, Watson can D up as being seen tonight. Not Mikki Moore.


Of course they are better than their record. That makes it easier to swallow if the C's lose to an 8-21 team.

I didn't say that as simply a teaspoon of sugar to help the medicine go down. Have you watched them play this year? They have some good players and in a Nelson system there are always players who outplay their averages on any given night. They have a few legit scorers, D-stoppers, role players that can shine. Watching them this year they have played much better than their record has shown.

All I know is that they have won 8 games. That says enough for me. I suppose the 76'ers were also much better than their record when they beat the Celts at home.