Author Topic: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28  (Read 125235 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #120 on: December 28, 2009, 11:45:38 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
I want Sheed to keep Chukcing up threes until he makes one again this year  ;D

... errr :]

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #121 on: December 28, 2009, 11:45:54 PM »

Offline MattG12

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3638
  • Tommy Points: 997
  • PEACE
I will be excited to see TMAC on a new team... provided he actually plays in games, he's still an exciting player to watch.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #122 on: December 28, 2009, 11:46:50 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Most glaring stat when I look at the boxscore: Eddie House is a -17 in 9 minutes.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #123 on: December 28, 2009, 11:47:23 PM »

Offline Thruthelookingglass

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • Tommy Points: 133
I'm just glad to be in games with no Pierce and a 65% KG(since xmas).

I am not one for excuses. The Warriors are the worst defensive team in the NBA and if you play defense against them and don't throw the ball away every other posession you beat them. The Clippers played without their best defensive player last night. This team, once again, is simply demonstrating that it either does not have the interest, nor killer instinct when it comes to beating lousy teams.

I have seen this since last year.  It was not a problem in year 1 of the Big 3 (and our championship).  For whatever reason, they don't finish.  Fakers with Shaq were same way.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #124 on: December 28, 2009, 11:47:30 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Great first 10 minutes completely negated by horrendous turnovers, bad defense and a total breakdown of the offense. Second unit does nothing and lack of backup point guard continues to hurt this team. So, will this be the night the C's blow an 18-point lead and lose to the 8-21 Warriors?

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #125 on: December 28, 2009, 11:47:39 PM »

Offline ChainSmokingLikeDino

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1422
  • Tommy Points: 96
I will be excited to see TMAC on a new team... provided he actually plays in games, he's still an exciting player to watch.

That is a big provided. I would have a hard time trading for him given his injury history vs. his salary. It is expiring though...but making it match up in a trade, think of what you may have to give up.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #126 on: December 28, 2009, 11:47:52 PM »

Online Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
I honestly wonder how many players in the NBA are worse than Scal. Can't be more than a dozen. He is absoolutely useless.

The problem is that Doc thinks he is better than 3-4 guys on our team. :(
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #127 on: December 28, 2009, 11:48:28 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Most glaring stat when I look at the boxscore: Eddie House is a -17 in 9 minutes.

Eddie is killing this team right now, but he has been big in the past. I for one, think he may be done. I hope he proves me wrong, but his shooting has just been horrendous lately.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #128 on: December 28, 2009, 11:48:35 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Most glaring stat when I look at the boxscore: Eddie House is a -17 in 9 minutes.

23 to 11 foul shooting

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #129 on: December 28, 2009, 11:49:06 PM »

Offline tomatolander

  • Lonnie Walker IV
  • Posts: 66
  • Tommy Points: 27
why does Rondo pick up a foul with 0.4s left and gift the Warriors another point??  :-[

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #130 on: December 28, 2009, 11:49:30 PM »

Online Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Bears and Vikings in OT.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #131 on: December 28, 2009, 11:49:45 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Most glaring stat when I look at the boxscore: Eddie House is a -17 in 9 minutes.

23 to 11 foul shooting

Don't start blaming the refs for this. Celts NOT taking the ball to the hoop and settling for jumpers. Golden State far more aggressive in the second quarter. If the Celts don't come out aggressive to start the third, this one could get ugly.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #132 on: December 28, 2009, 11:49:58 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
I honestly wonder how many players in the NBA are worse than Scal. Can't be more than a dozen. He is absoolutely useless.
While at times Scal is fairly useless, he does play a role.

As for tonight's role, he's played less than a minute. Not a lot you can blame on Scal tonight.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #133 on: December 28, 2009, 11:50:05 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31738
  • Tommy Points: 3845
  • Yup
Bears and Vikings in OT.

thanks, forgot that was on
Yup

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #134 on: December 28, 2009, 11:50:25 PM »

Offline MattG12

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3638
  • Tommy Points: 997
  • PEACE
I will be excited to see TMAC on a new team... provided he actually plays in games, he's still an exciting player to watch.

That is a big provided. I would have a hard time trading for him given his injury history vs. his salary. It is expiring though...but making it match up in a trade, think of what you may have to give up.

Oh absolutely. I would never want him on the Celtics... I just want to watch him play again.