I don't see Rondo's number retired anywhere now, he's not that good player to retire his number, but maybe he can transform with the years to come, I hope so
that would be the argument we had about paul pierce circa 2000.
No ones saying he's a lock, but if he were to remain a celtic his entire career, he would be the next logical choice, assuming he continues to improve and evolve.
KG and ray need at least one more championship and to put in 3+ productive years to even enter the discussion.
I'm with Roy, the one to get in, if any, will be Danny.
If KG finishes out his contract that would give him 5 years here, with a championship, plus he's on of the best players ever. I can't see him being left out.
Ray goes up if he signs here for less and beats that all-time 3 record in a C's uniform.
How would his hypothetical five years on the Celtics put him among the best ever celtics players?
It's not a lifetime achievement award, it's based on your contributions while CELTICS is across your chest.
If KG plays here at a high level for 5 years and gets another championship for us, i'd be ok with it. But the fact that he's had a great career in Minnesota is immaterial to whether the Celtics should retire his number.
same argument against ray. i don't really care if he breaks the all time three point record in a C's uniform for number retirement purposes. I'll be ecstatic for ray, but 90+% of that record won't have been in a C's uniform, why on earth is it relevant?
Getting your jersey retired means something here. I'm all set with having great players show up for 3-5 years and getting their number in the rafters based on thier previous acomplishments, thanks.