Poll

Aside from Paul Pierce, what Celtic has the best shot at getting their number in the rafters?

Rajon Rondo
7 (25%)
Kevin Garnett
17 (60.7%)
Ray Allen
2 (7.1%)
Kendrick Perkins
2 (7.1%)

Total Members Voted: 28

Author Topic: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?  (Read 10080 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2009, 02:11:43 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Garnett/Allen might have their numbers retired yet, but that would require 4+ years more of each and another title.

Why do you say that?
Because if Allen only plays here for three seasons he won't have been a Celtics long enough to have his jersey retired. Same if KG ends up being traded at some point in the future.

I think both have to bring home multiple titles to earn a retired jersey.

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2009, 02:12:38 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34772
  • Tommy Points: 1607
Pierce is the only logical answer to this question.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2009, 02:13:46 PM »

Offline ACF

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10756
  • Tommy Points: 1157
  • A Celtic Fan
Pierce is the only logical answer to this question.

"Question: Aside from Paul Pierce, what Celtic has the best shot at getting their number in the rafters?"

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #18 on: October 14, 2009, 02:16:03 PM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7682
  • Tommy Points: 447
Ainge is going to have his number retired eventually. If he's GM long enough though he might wait until after Pierce has his number retired.

Garnett/Allen might have their numbers retired yet, but that would require 4+ years more of each and another title.
I agree with the additional title part.  And I don't really think KG was the centerpiece of our championship.  I would call Pierce the centerpiece.  KG was Pippenlike in my opinion.  He was good throughout the games but Pierce did most of the clutch damage.  Hell, PJ Brown did as much clutch damage.

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #19 on: October 14, 2009, 02:28:06 PM »

Offline Tough Juice

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 230
  • Tommy Points: 17
I don't see Rondo's number retired anywhere now, he's not that good player to retire his number, but maybe he can transform with the years to come, I hope so

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #20 on: October 14, 2009, 02:31:33 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Ainge is going to have his number retired eventually. If he's GM long enough though he might wait until after Pierce has his number retired.

Garnett/Allen might have their numbers retired yet, but that would require 4+ years more of each and another title.
I agree with the additional title part.  And I don't really think KG was the centerpiece of our championship.  I would call Pierce the centerpiece.  KG was Pippenlike in my opinion.  He was good throughout the games but Pierce did most of the clutch damage.  Hell, PJ Brown did as much clutch damage.
Not true KG was our leading scorer in the playoffs, and our leading 4th quarter scorer in the playoffs.

He scored more efficiently, rebounded more, and is a better defender than Pierce. KG was our best player in 07-08 and is still our best player.

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #21 on: October 14, 2009, 03:18:26 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
I think Rondo definitely has the best shot because he has the best shot to play here the longest.

KG and Ray need more years in the uniform and more titles.  If they both play here for about 4 more years that's very possible.  But the chances of them staying here for that long, or even staying in the league that long are way less than Rondo's (and Rondo has already shown he can be a main contributer).
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #22 on: October 14, 2009, 03:42:53 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
I don't see Rondo's number retired anywhere now, he's not that good player to retire his number, but maybe he can transform with the years to come, I hope so

that would be the argument we had about paul pierce circa 2000.

No ones saying he's a lock, but if he were to remain a celtic his entire career, he would be the next logical choice, assuming he continues to improve and evolve.

KG and ray need at least one more championship and to put in 3+ productive years to even enter the discussion.

I'm with Roy, the one to get in, if any, will be Danny.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #23 on: October 14, 2009, 03:58:38 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
I don't see Rondo's number retired anywhere now, he's not that good player to retire his number, but maybe he can transform with the years to come, I hope so

that would be the argument we had about paul pierce circa 2000.

No ones saying he's a lock, but if he were to remain a celtic his entire career, he would be the next logical choice, assuming he continues to improve and evolve.

KG and ray need at least one more championship and to put in 3+ productive years to even enter the discussion.

I'm with Roy, the one to get in, if any, will be Danny.

If KG finishes out his contract that would give him 5 years here, with a championship, plus he's on of the best players ever. I can't see him being left out.

Ray goes up if he signs here for less and beats that all-time 3 record in a C's uniform.

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #24 on: October 14, 2009, 04:01:10 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
I don't see Rondo's number retired anywhere now, he's not that good player to retire his number, but maybe he can transform with the years to come, I hope so

that would be the argument we had about paul pierce circa 2000.

No ones saying he's a lock, but if he were to remain a celtic his entire career, he would be the next logical choice, assuming he continues to improve and evolve.

KG and ray need at least one more championship and to put in 3+ productive years to even enter the discussion.

I'm with Roy, the one to get in, if any, will be Danny.

If KG finishes out his contract that would give him 5 years here, with a championship, plus he's on of the best players ever. I can't see him being left out.

Ray goes up if he signs here for less and beats that all-time 3 record in a C's uniform.

How would his hypothetical five years on the Celtics put him among the best ever celtics players?

It's not a lifetime achievement award, it's based on your contributions while CELTICS is across your chest.

If KG plays here at a high level for 5 years and gets another championship for us, i'd be ok with it. But the fact that he's had a great career in Minnesota is immaterial to whether the Celtics should retire his number.

same argument against ray. i don't really care if he breaks the all time three point record in a C's uniform for number retirement purposes. I'll be ecstatic for ray, but 90+% of that record won't have been in a C's uniform, why on earth is it relevant?

Getting your jersey retired means something here. I'm all set with having great players show up for 3-5 years and getting their number in the rafters based on thier previous acomplishments, thanks.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #25 on: October 14, 2009, 04:15:36 PM »

Offline Quinn

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 697
  • Tommy Points: 28
Will Soloman.
He's to dear to our hearts to have his number be used by some low-life good for nothing player.
Only the greatest can live up to his legacy.
Practice? Whatchu talkin about practice?

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #26 on: October 14, 2009, 04:30:17 PM »

Offline ma11l

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2639
  • Tommy Points: 233
  • Let's Go Celtics
For now I'm going to go with none of the above.  In my opinion the only one with a chance is Rondo.  Obviously we'll have to see how his contract and career turn out.


KG and Ray simply aren't going to be around long enough for it.  KG will have his 21 in Minnesota retired I would hope but not here.  Ray will go with either the Bucks or the Sonics I would guess if any.
"Take this down," said O'Neal. "My name is Shaquille O'Neal and Paul Pierce is the (expletive) truth. Quote me on that and don't take nothing out. I knew he could play, but I didn't know he could play like this. Paul Pierce is the truth."

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #27 on: October 14, 2009, 04:51:11 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32367
  • Tommy Points: 10100
I'm going to say Danny Ainge.

Hmm interesting... Do you have a mole or are you speculating?

Just speculation, based upon some things Wyc has said in the past.  Basically, Wyc's in favor of retiring the number
from what I understand, but Danny has politely declined thus far.
But he was thinking of retiring it in Scal's honor, not Danny's  ;D

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #28 on: October 14, 2009, 05:09:04 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
If they win another title and especially if they win two I see the distinct possibility of all 3 of the Big 3 getting retired on the same night.

If they don't I gotta go with Rondo.

Re: Next to get their number retired by Celtics?
« Reply #29 on: October 14, 2009, 05:40:33 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
R2, assuming he stays with the Celts for his entire career.

Thats like 12 years away, they'll throw someone up there before that.

Get back to me in 12 years  ;)

  You don't think Pierce will get his number retired in the next 12 years? I just don't see that not happening.