« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Nate Robinson???  (Read 6185 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Nate Robinson???
« on: August 07, 2009, 08:31:17 AM »

Offline laverdad34

  • Lonnie Walker IV
  • Posts: 52
  • Tommy Points: 13
From realgm.com

"A confidant of Nate Robinson said that Robinson is willing to wait for the Knicks to see their other off-season plans to a conclusion before getting back to him.

Robinson has "made it clear to Donnie [Walsh] and the organization that he wants to be there" and will "wait patiently while they sort through whatever they need to," said the source.

In the meantime, Alan Hahn calls the Knicks' signing of Ramon Sessions "inevitable" and says "there's reason to believe the Knicks want him enough to do what it takes" to add Sessions to the roster.

Sessions' agent Chubby Wells, who last week predicted a resolution of his client's status by early this week, has stopped providing updates on the progress of negotiations with the Knicks."

Do you think that if sessions sign, he'll be the backup PG?? if that's correct...robinson will sign anyway with them?? or we have a chance to get him to be the backup of R2??
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2009, 09:20:27 AM »

Offline adam8

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 415
  • Tommy Points: 54
He will be looking for a lot more than the lle no way we could get him and if he didn't want to go to the knicks because they got sessions why would he come here to play behind rondo
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2009, 06:30:27 PM »

Offline jdub1660

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1355
  • Tommy Points: 87
He wouldn't want to go back to NYC b/c he'd be fighting for minutes with Sessions and overpaid Duhon. Here he could join House in the backcourt to form the shortest backcourt in the NBA. I love his game but sad to say he can't guard a chair(aside from risky steal attempts b/c he biting his defenders ankles, And when he came off the weak side and blocked Yao LUCKY) I would still take him

Trade Tony Allen and cash for Nate Rob...Other than that, not going to happen
Logged
Can't stop, Rondo!
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2009, 05:53:17 AM »

Offline timepiece33

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1747
  • Tommy Points: 78
Why wouldn't he just sign a deal with Sacramento that the Knicks won't match (2 year deal).  They tried to trade for him already.
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2009, 10:21:53 AM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
Nate Rob in Beantown. Sign and trade for Scal and Giddens. What a spark plug filled bench with sheed, rob, house, baby, and daniels.
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2009, 11:35:50 AM »

Offline revcummings

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 117
  • Tommy Points: 17
I'd rather keep Scal! Robinson and House couldn't effectively play at the same time. If we get a back up point guard, I'd rather get someone with some height so House can play at the two.
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2009, 02:34:53 PM »

Offline gar

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2629
  • Tommy Points: 247
  • Strength from Within
Quote from: revcummings on August 08, 2009, 11:35:50 AM
I'd rather keep Scal! Robinson and House couldn't effectively play at the same time. If we get a back up point guard, I'd rather get someone with some height so House can play at the two.

TP Good point

Plus never liked the guy!
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2009, 02:47:54 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
Robinson would be a great asset on the team, but with House still here, I don't think there is much of a role for him. The perfect guy for us would be like Derick Fisher, a bigger PG that can distribute the ball on an average level and allow Eddie to play a hybrid SGPG while he'd on the court.
Logged

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2009, 02:51:11 PM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
Nate would be nice addition if we trade House. We can't have them both.
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #9 on: August 08, 2009, 02:56:36 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
Quote from: Change on August 08, 2009, 02:51:11 PM
Nate would be nice addition if we trade House. We can't have them both.

as it says above, I agree with that, but to add, its not because of their offensive skill sets. They kind of complement each other that way. Its because defensively together they'd be a huge liability, and signing one to explicitly not put on the court with the other seems like a waste and doesn't maximize either player.
Logged

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #10 on: August 08, 2009, 02:58:21 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
I'd love to have him. I just don't see him coming here for next to no money. Granted I didn't see that for Daniels either. Then again he's not here yet
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #11 on: August 08, 2009, 03:26:07 PM »

Offline NeedForSheed

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 32
  • Tommy Points: 6
I don't think Robinson comes here. Jason Williams makes more sense, but in the past I don't believe Ainge has pursued Williams. I guess Williams goes better on a running team. Robinson likes it in New York and won't take less to come here.
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2009, 01:29:21 AM »

Offline budMovin

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 217
  • Tommy Points: 26
A 5'6" shooting guard?
Logged
"What we do in life echoes in eternity"
                 -Gladiator
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #13 on: August 16, 2009, 05:25:55 PM »

Offline Nut from Nh

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 37
  • Tommy Points: 10
Quote from: budMovin on August 10, 2009, 01:29:21 AM
A 5'6" shooting guard?

Yup. Instant energy, 2 threes per, 2 steals per, 17 points, 4 assists, and how about 4 rebounds per?

a tremendous rebounder, tremendous.  everybody calls him a 2 like thats a big deal. there are less than a dozen pure points in this league of starter caliber.  He can create just fine, especially with everything else he does.  And he's still getting better, and he's a competitor, a fighter (literally) Boston would love him.
Logged
Re: Nate Robinson???
« Reply #14 on: August 20, 2009, 10:52:37 PM »

Offline Nuggets15

  • Torrey Craig
  • Posts: 5
  • Tommy Points: 0
Nate the great is a thug
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »