BTW just so that the mods don't think this is personal on my part, because it isn't, I have received no less than 6 PMs from GMs around the league lauding my stance and agreeing that the NY GM only kept his team because he was a mods brother and that it isn't fair that said GM gets to do nothing and have others make his picks for him and yet if someone disagrees the mod brother is going to get defensive and summarily make bad comparisons between your team and that NY team.
As someone who has absolutely no stake in this argument,
I think it's fair that New York gets a pass when he has lost the internet for reasons that are out of his hands. He didn't take a vacation,k he's not blowing it off, he simply can't get to the internet.
I also think that the Knicks are a significantly better than the DC Boxers. I'm concerned with the ability of Jackson and Wallace to co exist, I don't buy into the Ramon Sessions hype and I agree with the statements made about Joel Pryzbilia. I do really like Scola though. But at the end of the day, just my opinion, I don't think this is playoff team, nor do I think they're anywhere close.
There's a surprise! Another GM whom the DC Boxers GM felt had a bad team is saying the Boxers won't make the playoffs. Very original.
Charlotte you may as well join the group as in a little while you will be finding out that I don't think you team is very good either.
I think all GM's, regardless of your thoughts on their team, have the right to assess and in this case criticize your team, Nick. Just like I disagree with your assesment of my team, you can disagree with me:
But I honestly don't see eye to eye with you on your team, and it's completely unrelated to your negative comments on my team. I just don't like it. Personally, I think it's one of the worst teams out there.
I don't see any kind of identity, I think Session and Pryzbilia are way overrated and I question how Wallace and Jackson would coexist based off of Jackson's ball dominance.
And even though he's one of my favorite non-Celtics I think you selected Stephen Jackson WAY too early, especially when players like Joe Johnson and OJ Mayo were still available. Both of those players, in my opinion would've been a much better fit for your team. But if you're that high on Jackson, why wouldn't you trade down?
And even though I like Scola, I think you would've been better off playing Wallace at the 4 and then drafting either a shooting guard (and have Jax play 3) or a small forward which would've given you more of an identity. And this can't even be accomplished, as your best bench swing is a very unproven Julian Wright who was a tremendous let down for New Orleans this year.
Again, this is not anything personal, just my honest thoughts on your team.