I think BBD rebounding will increase with conditioning.
It might, if his conditioning were to improve. We've seen little sign of this.
Once he played big minutes his conditioning clearly improved. He needs to maintain that as a bench player though.
I still think BBD is a backup on an average team, a fourth big on a good team, and starter on a lottery team. That's why no one is making him an offer. They'd like to sign him, but only a price the C's would match.
Yeah, he's not getting the MLE unless a team is really stupid. I got maybe see a team looking to be FA players next summer giving him close to the MLE for one year, but he certainly won't get what Rasheed got, and I don't even see him getting the one year MLE. As Fafnir said, he's just not starter quality on a contender, and arguably not even the first big man off the bench. Why would you give big bucks to a guy like that?
I think there's a good chance he comes back. But honestly, if he doesn't, I wouldn't be that much more disappointed with Powe. As long as he's healthy by the playoffs, there's little downgrade between him and Baby.
I want Baby back, I don't want to be counting on a player coming back from a third ACL tear unless we don't have another option.
I generally agree about the "counting" part; however, I question how much we're going to have to "count" on Baby or Powe particularly in the playoffs, but even in the regular season. Even if we only played KG, Perk, and Wallace 30 mpg each (a very low number for players of their caliber), that leaves a whopping 6 mpg for Powe or Davis. And there's no way their numbers stay that low in the playoffs, pretty much entirely knocking any 4th big man out of the rotation.
Again, I'd prefer Davis for insurance reasons, but if we're only talking 5-10 mpg for the 4th big man (and likely close to zero minutes come playoff time), I think we'd likely be fine using Scalabrine in the short term and rolling the dice on Powe for the long term.