Author Topic: My Next Question About Daniels  (Read 4358 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

My Next Question About Daniels
« on: July 19, 2009, 07:54:37 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31864
  • Tommy Points: 3850
  • Yup
I've been pretty well locked up all weekend for school, and was busy as hell getting ready for school the couple of days prior.  I'm reading a lot of stuff on here about "what if we do trade 3 players for Daniels" and "what if this that the other for Daniels,."

What's the deal?  Has a trade been done?  Is it simply a free agent signing?  Is it official?

I'm confused
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 12:16:10 AM by Redz »
Yup

Re: Do we have Daniels?
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2009, 07:56:41 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
he has agreed to come to boston. his agent said both teams prefer and sign and trade and are working the players out.

Re: Do we have Daniels?
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2009, 08:01:03 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31864
  • Tommy Points: 3850
  • Yup
he has agreed to come to boston. his agent said both teams prefer and sign and trade and are working the players out.

thanks...was to lazy and tired to figure it out myself
Yup

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2009, 12:19:23 AM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31864
  • Tommy Points: 3850
  • Yup
Any concern over his career Games Missed record?

03-04 missed 26 games
04-05 missed 22 games
05-06 missed 20 games
06-07 missed 37 games
07-08 missed  8 games
08=09 missed 28 games

I know he's only coming here to be a backup, but that's a pretty lousy track record
Yup

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2009, 12:22:53 AM »

Offline vagrantwade

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 560
  • Tommy Points: 42
Any concern over his career Games Missed record?

03-04 missed 26 games
04-05 missed 22 games
05-06 missed 20 games
06-07 missed 37 games
07-08 missed  8 games
08=09 missed 28 games

I know he's only coming here to be a backup, but that's a pretty lousy track record


Compared to anyone else in free agency, not really.

Pretty typical for a career bench player.

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2009, 10:33:33 AM »

Offline tb727

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1552
  • Tommy Points: 129
Is this official yet?  When is the press conference?  Who did we trade for him?  Or did we sign him?  Did I miss something in the past few days? 

I'm confused, and obviously inquisitive.
Jay Wingspan Bilas

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2009, 10:45:24 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53415
  • Tommy Points: 2578
Any concern over his career Games Missed record?

03-04 missed 26 games
04-05 missed 22 games
05-06 missed 20 games
06-07 missed 37 games
07-08 missed  8 games
08=09 missed 28 games

I know he's only coming here to be a backup, but that's a pretty lousy track record
Absolutely ... but the market lacked better options. Just have to take the risk, and hope he's healthy when it counts.

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2009, 11:15:29 AM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
Any concern over his career Games Missed record?

03-04 missed 26 games
04-05 missed 22 games
05-06 missed 20 games
06-07 missed 37 games
07-08 missed  8 games
08=09 missed 28 games

I know he's only coming here to be a backup, but that's a pretty lousy track record
Absolutely ... but the market lacked better options. Just have to take the risk, and hope he's healthy when it counts.

Yeah.  I think the C's should err with him and the entire team on the side of caution and do what the Sox are doing with Wakefield now.  Could Wake probably pitch his next start?  Sure.  But why risk it?  It's even more true for the C's, who even with Bill Walker as the primary backup at the 2/3 would still probably win 65+ games.  So if Daniels even has the slightest tweak, the C's should just rest him for a week or two.  All that matters is that he's 100% for the playoffs.  This team could play the starters 20 mpg and still be a top 4 seed in the East. 

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2009, 09:09:53 AM »

Offline Michael Anthony

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 874
  • Tommy Points: 117
I wonder if McRoberts was the holdup, didn't he just re-up?
"All I have to know is, he's my coach, and I follow his lead. He didn't have to say anything in here this week. We all knew what we had to do. He's a big part of our family, and we're like his extended family. And we did what good families do when one of their own is affected." - Teddy Bruschi

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2009, 09:59:04 AM »

Offline the_Bird

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Tommy Points: 176
Any concern over his career Games Missed record?

03-04 missed 26 games
04-05 missed 22 games
05-06 missed 20 games
06-07 missed 37 games
07-08 missed  8 games
08=09 missed 28 games

I know he's only coming here to be a backup, but that's a pretty lousy track record
Absolutely ... but the market lacked better options. Just have to take the risk, and hope he's healthy when it counts.

Had he not missed so many games, Larry *might* have picked up his option (probably not, but Larry's done some weird things before).  At the very least, he wouldn't likely be a LLE-level free agent if he had been more durable. 

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2009, 10:00:33 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34125
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Any concern over his career Games Missed record?

03-04 missed 26 games
04-05 missed 22 games
05-06 missed 20 games
06-07 missed 37 games
07-08 missed  8 games
08=09 missed 28 games

I know he's only coming here to be a backup, but that's a pretty lousy track record
Absolutely ... but the market lacked better options. Just have to take the risk, and hope he's healthy when it counts.

Had he not missed so many games, Larry *might* have picked up his option (probably not, but Larry's done some weird things before).  At the very least, he wouldn't likely be a LLE-level free agent if he had been more durable. 

His 'duribility' is the reason the Celtics should look into another SF.

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2009, 10:09:27 AM »

Offline the_Bird

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Tommy Points: 176
Can't argue with that, unless they're convinced that either Giddens or Walker will step up (and I don't think they are).  I'm more concerned about them adding another body up front, though.  Scal's still around, too, I'd rather he get his minutes at the 4 but he can spell Pierce a bit, too.  If they bring back Starbury or sign Ty Lue, you still have Eddie House backing up Jesus at the 2 and Scal at the 3 for those nights when Daniels is out.

So, yeah, sign another wing if you can at the minimum - but I think the first priority is sorting out the 4th-big man and the second priority is figuring out who's playing behind Rondo. 

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2009, 10:14:58 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34125
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Can't argue with that, unless they're convinced that either Giddens or Walker will step up (and I don't think they are).  I'm more concerned about them adding another body up front, though.  Scal's still around, too, I'd rather he get his minutes at the 4 but he can spell Pierce a bit, too.  If they bring back Starbury or sign Ty Lue, you still have Eddie House backing up Jesus at the 2 and Scal at the 3 for those nights when Daniels is out.

So, yeah, sign another wing if you can at the minimum - but I think the first priority is sorting out the 4th-big man and the second priority is figuring out who's playing behind Rondo. 

I think a 4th big (Davis or Diogu) and a backup PG (they have never seemed to like House as the main one) are on their lists.


I am not sure if another SF/SG is.

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2009, 10:24:57 AM »

Offline P2

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2088
  • Tommy Points: 163
  • Green 18!
Can't argue with that, unless they're convinced that either Giddens or Walker will step up (and I don't think they are).  I'm more concerned about them adding another body up front, though.  Scal's still around, too, I'd rather he get his minutes at the 4 but he can spell Pierce a bit, too.  If they bring back Starbury or sign Ty Lue, you still have Eddie House backing up Jesus at the 2 and Scal at the 3 for those nights when Daniels is out.

So, yeah, sign another wing if you can at the minimum - but I think the first priority is sorting out the 4th-big man and the second priority is figuring out who's playing behind Rondo. 

I think a 4th big (Davis or Diogu) and a backup PG (they have never seemed to like House as the main one) are on their lists.


I am not sure if another SF/SG is.

Milwaukee will not pick up Bowen's option, which expires August 1, and right now they're still trying to trade him. So I think he could be a cheap, but very effective help in the 10-15 minutes he would get. I'm pretty sure Danny is targeting him. I also think we wouldn't need a backup PG in this case, and could use House/Hudson/Daniels. I'm talking about:

SF PP/Bowen
SG Ray/Daniels/Giddens
PG Rondo/House/Hudson

If Bowen is out, use Daniels at 2/3 and House at 1/2.

If Daniels is out, use Bowen at 2/3 and House at 1/2.

If House is out, use Daniels at 1/2 and Bowen at 2/3.

Re: My Next Question About Daniels
« Reply #14 on: July 23, 2009, 10:36:35 AM »

Offline the_Bird

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Tommy Points: 176
Can't argue with that, unless they're convinced that either Giddens or Walker will step up (and I don't think they are).  I'm more concerned about them adding another body up front, though.  Scal's still around, too, I'd rather he get his minutes at the 4 but he can spell Pierce a bit, too.  If they bring back Starbury or sign Ty Lue, you still have Eddie House backing up Jesus at the 2 and Scal at the 3 for those nights when Daniels is out.

So, yeah, sign another wing if you can at the minimum - but I think the first priority is sorting out the 4th-big man and the second priority is figuring out who's playing behind Rondo. 

I think a 4th big (Davis or Diogu) and a backup PG (they have never seemed to like House as the main one) are on their lists.


I am not sure if another SF/SG is.

If they trade Giddens or Walker, I could see them going for someone like Bowen (who looks completely done to me, seems to be a waste of a roster space).  If both guys make it through the summer, I don't think they make a move, I think they hope and pray one of them proves able to play a few meaningful minutes and grows into that backup role.  There always seem to be a few fringe-rotation guys scuffling around after camp starts, and maybe they'll get lucky with someone who didn't get any good offers and starts getting desperate for a job once camps start.

As long as Giddens and Walker both wear the green, adding someone else (even at short money) seems unlikely with other positions of need.  And yeah, they haven't wanted Eddie running the point since he got here, I don't see him as being more of a liability out there than having someone like Ty Lue get minutes, but they're the ones making the decisions.

You have a free-agent target in mind?