Author Topic: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics  (Read 24621 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #45 on: July 07, 2009, 04:51:26 AM »

Offline Prof. Clutch

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2199
  • Tommy Points: 237
  • Mind Games
Celtics. 

add: KG, Wallace
loss: Davis, Powe, Marbury, Moore

Lakers

add: Artest
loss: Ariza, Odom




I still like the Celtics better.

That's exactly the way I look at it.  But did the Lakers indeed lose Odom, or is that still up in the air?

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #46 on: July 07, 2009, 06:45:36 AM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34707
  • Tommy Points: 1603
Celtics. 

add: KG, Wallace
loss: Davis, Powe, Marbury, Moore

Lakers

add: Artest
loss: Ariza, Odom




I still like the Celtics better.

That's exactly the way I look at it.  But did the Lakers indeed lose Odom, or is that still up in the air?
um, the C's had KG when the Lakers beat the Celtics both times last year.
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #47 on: July 07, 2009, 08:40:25 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Celtics. 

add: KG, Wallace
loss: Davis, Powe, Marbury, Moore

Lakers

add: Artest
loss: Ariza, Odom




I still like the Celtics better.

That's exactly the way I look at it.  But did the Lakers indeed lose Odom, or is that still up in the air?
um, the C's had KG when the Lakers beat the Celtics both times last year.

Regular season does not equal playoff series.


Just ask Cleveland the year they went to the finals against a team they had swept in the regular season.

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #48 on: July 07, 2009, 08:42:37 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Celtics. 

add: KG, Wallace
loss: Davis, Powe, Marbury, Moore

Lakers

add: Artest
loss: Ariza, Odom




I still like the Celtics better.

That's exactly the way I look at it.  But did the Lakers indeed lose Odom, or is that still up in the air?
um, the C's had KG when the Lakers beat the Celtics both times last year.

Does that include the game where they took KG out of the game with a ton of BS foul calls?

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #49 on: July 07, 2009, 08:44:52 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Anyways, the choice is clearly the C's. The only real advantage the Lakers had on the Celtics was their length in the front court. Now we have the big man advantage quite easily. The wing situation is pretty much the same for both teams, our PG situation is better. Celtics, easily.

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #50 on: July 09, 2009, 12:46:49 AM »

Offline iWantKGsBabies

  • Maine Celtic
  • Posts: 1
  • Tommy Points: 0
They were discussing this on WEEI when I was out on my lunch break.  The hosts were saying with the addition or Artest, the lakers are better than the Celts.  I personally think that losing Ariza and Odom is a far bigger loss than just Artest can pick up.  Odom especially because of his size and versatility. 

What do you all think?
Artest >> Ariza, and maybe its just me, but I don't remember seeing anything about Odom signing with another team.

I think the C's are better right now. Ariza was the Lakers best defender not named Kobe, and often played in crunchtime for them. He was their version of posey last year. And Odom was their starting 4. I think they will resign him which will bring the teams back even, but right now its the C's.
Ariza is considered the best defender other than Kobe because of those 2 steals in the playoffs.  Anyone who actually watches the game rather than SportsCenter knows Ariza isn't their defensive savior.

Plus, Artest is about 5 times the defender Ariza ever will be.  Once the Lakers re-sign Odom, I'd say the Lakers take it since their bench can outrun the C's like no other.

We were better than them last year. Winning the title means nothing, we have a better starting line up and we are very close to having a great bench. If we meet in the finals(I hope to God we do) it will be a slaughter of epic proportions. Also dont forget that kobe hasnt had much time off due to two late postseasons and the Olympics. I think you will see him slowing down this year a little.
Then what does?  Having the most wins during regular season?  because the Lakers defeated the Boston in that race too.  Let's not forget the Lakers were 2-0 against the Celtics despite the C's have KG and the Lakers not having Bynum.  Wait, does this mean that the regular season doesn't matter either?  What does then?  Preseason?  Summer league?

Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the C's main excuse for losing "oh regular season doesn't matter.  We're still the champions till someone else wins so the Lakers are still much worse than the C's!!!  YEAH THE CELTICS ARE THE CHAMPIONS!!!"?

Hypocrites.

I still think Rondo/Ray/Pierce/KG/Perkins is the best starting 5 in basketball at both ends of the court, and a bench that features Sheed and House is extremely promising.  Best defensive team in the league, with enough offense to overcome anyone.  Including the Lakers.
Gasol = Garnett   (KG's more effective, but he's coming off a huge injury)
Kobe > Allen   (no explanation needed)
Bynum > Perkins   (even, but bynum's height gives him an advantage)
Odom > Wallace   (Odom's much quicker and versatile)
Artest = Pierce  (Pierce's offense is neutralized by Artest's defense)
Fisher < Rondo  (Rondo's way too fast for Fisher)

Jackson > Rivers  (10 > 1)
Kupchak > Ainge   (4 > 1)

Overall, as of now, I'd say the Lakers take it.  All depends on how injuries and chemistry plays out for both teams though.

I'm really surprised Odom hasn't been locked up by the Lakers! I thought that was a no brainer. Yeah, without Odom the C's are better... If/When Odom signs, the Lakers will be more loaded again.

Now if Grant Hill or some other stud on the wing is signed, we've got a really goood topic to debate.

If Hill AND Davis are signed, the Celtics will have the best team on paper for sure.

I give you props for actually using your brain.

Odom will stay there.  He likes it there, and they are going to give him decent bucks to stay.

Artest really makes them a more physical, tougher team. Our edge over them in 08 was that we were tougher, mentally and physically. The Lakers showed alot of mental toughness in winning the championship this season. I for one cannot say that we would have beaten them with a healthy KG.  We had a healthy KG during the first regular season game and they beat us pretty easily. Can't remember whether he was healthy or not the second game.

In any case, it will be a great series if we meet each other in the finals.  I think the 09/10 NBA seasaon is going to be phenomenal.  I am definitely signing up for my League Pass, even if I have to get another job to pay for it!!

I agree.... If healthy we would have had a [dang] good series... with the advantage going to the Lakers.

No matter what we needed more health and a better bench, a much better bench. We had no 6th or 7th man all year.  :(

Now we have our 6th man!!  ;D

Time to find Mr. 7

You as well sir.  Congratulations.  I was just beginning to lose all hope for the residents of Boston when you two came in the clutch and showed that there is indeed intelligent life there.

I know the regular season is not the post season, but the Lakers did beat a fully healthy Celtics squad twice this past season.  And hell the game in Boston, Bynum didn't even play and Luke Walton started both games and played 28 and 33 minutes respectively.  Luke Walton should never be playing that many minutes.  EVER.

Artest is significantly better than Ariza.  Obviously if Odom doesn't return that would hurt the Lakers, but assuming he returns, the Lakers are the better team (though I think the C's could easily win a playoff series).

Thank you.



In conclusion, it's fairly obvious it's an even match up with an advantage going to the Lakers.  Additionally, since they just won the championship, the Celtics will remain worse than them till they outperform them in the playoffs.

Also, I've noticed that all the retarded posts are coming from the people who've accumulated a significantly higher number of posts compared to the people who looked at the facts realistically.  I once again congratulate all 3 of you for using your heads, and as for the others, I'd like to recommend some time away from the forums to allow your brain to recover from the damage it suffered through by spending so much time on this site.


Good night, and we look forward to meeting you in the fall.


Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #51 on: July 09, 2009, 01:07:47 AM »

Offline blueygreen

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 349
  • Tommy Points: 49
Sorry Babies, but I can't agree with your assessment of the "starting 6" you have there. I'm pretty sure if Danny called up LA and offered Perk for Bynum straight up they'd do it in a heartbeat, but I can accept that each team loves their own players more so I'll call it a wash. The other big one for me is saying that KG = Gasol. Yes, he is coming off an injury but we don't know how that will affect him. We can't predict the future, and the past says that KG will perform better than Pau. As for Artest being able to contain Pierce...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FD796H08J7w

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #52 on: July 09, 2009, 01:12:21 AM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
LA won't even make it to the West finals so I'm more concerned with SA or Denver.

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #53 on: July 09, 2009, 02:09:44 AM »

Offline timepiece33

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1747
  • Tommy Points: 78
If KG were healthy, I suspect we would have done what we did to the Lakers in the last final.  Point blank ... when push comes to shove, we are the tougher, more experienced team.   

Unfortunately, KG wasn't healthy and we lost so Lakers fans can come in and taunt even though when we played them with top players in play, they weren't close. 

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #54 on: July 09, 2009, 02:30:38 AM »

Offline illestmcsgt

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 314
  • Tommy Points: 26
Gasol = Garnett   (KG's more effective, but he's coming off a huge injury)
Kobe > Allen   (no explanation needed)
Bynum > Perkins   (even, but bynum's height gives him an advantage)
Odom > Wallace   (Odom's much quicker and versatile)
Artest = Pierce  (Pierce's offense is neutralized by Artest's defense)
Fisher < Rondo  (Rondo's way too fast for Fisher)

Jackson > Rivers  (10 > 1)
Kupchak > Ainge   (4 > 1)

Overall, as of now, I'd say the Lakers take it.  All depends on how injuries and chemistry plays out for both teams though.

Artest = Pierce and Gasol = Garnett no wonder your a Laker fan. That's like us saying Ray is better then Kobe that's just ludicrous. Everything else is about right but I think Wallace and Odom are both old so they would be equal. Also Bynum and Perkins almost equal with advantage to Perkins because he is more experienced. Rest of the bench is equal too but could change if we sign other players to complete it. Because we got House, Scal, maybe Hill and Big Baby with whoever else we sign. Then Lakers bench is Walton, Farmar, Sasha, and I don't know the rest so it's about the same right now until we sign another player or two like BBD and Hill.

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #55 on: July 09, 2009, 02:50:18 AM »

Offline star18

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 741
  • Tommy Points: 72
Gasol = Garnett   (KG's more effective, but he's coming off a huge injury)
Kobe > Allen   (no explanation needed)
Bynum > Perkins   (even, but bynum's height gives him an advantage)
Odom > Wallace   (Odom's much quicker and versatile)
Artest = Pierce  (Pierce's offense is neutralized by Artest's defense)
Fisher < Rondo  (Rondo's way too fast for Fisher)

This makes no sense.  When has Gasol ever equaled Garnett.  Never.   What has Bynum done to make him better than Perkins.  Nothing. Odom can be a bit better than Sheed but not by much.  If you put Odom over Sheed you have to put Pierce over Artest.   And when we get Grant,BBD, & Star back plus House and possibly Powe & TA who do the Lakers have to match up with that. Luke? Sascha? Shannon? Not really that much there.    Getcha gatorade ready.    18,19,20 etc. 

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #56 on: July 09, 2009, 04:44:54 PM »

Offline kfdodgerfan

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 31
  • Tommy Points: 6
I come in peace. I really do. To say the least, it is interesting to read the posts on this forum this past year.

It is the offseason, so I posted a link to this thread in a Laker forum to get reactions to your thoughts.

It is at:

http://forums.lakersground.net/viewtopic.php?t=93793&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

Feel free to jump on over, but here are some responses from Laker fans in that thread.

----

"The Celtic fans are deluded. The 08 Celtics MIGHT have beaten the 09 Lakers, the 09 Cs would have had no chance. Do they forget that their 3rd and 4th best defenders who also scored well for them left, and on the other side the Lakers got Ariza and Bynum?"

----

"2 celtics homers claim the lakers only won both games this year because of length. uh, last i checked, the lakers won in boston without bynum while the celtics were healthy. boston got exposed.

now the celtics add an old fart who was only able to shoot 7% of his shots in the paint, and that lack of speed and mobility is supposed to scare someone?   they can defend rasheed at the 3 pt line with a pg! "

----

"Are you kidding, we're better. We sweeped them last season with the lineup we had and now with the addition of Artest and hopefully keeping Lamar, and with the experience we gained from back to back Finals, last one ending up with us holding up the trophy, we're going to eat leprechauns for breakfast, lunch, and dinner."

----

"What a joke. Celts would have won if KG wasn't injured? Well what short memories, guess what happen before that? Bynum and Ariza was injured."

----

Well, you get the picture....

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #57 on: July 31, 2009, 08:46:46 PM »

Offline kfdodgerfan

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 31
  • Tommy Points: 6
Revisiting because Odom signed.

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #58 on: July 31, 2009, 09:11:42 PM »

Offline Rondo_is_better

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2821
  • Tommy Points: 495
  • R.I.P. Nate Dogg
09 Celtics were the best team in the league until KG went down. Everyone seems to forget how much we we're killing teams at the start of the year. Best start in NBA history, in case you forgot. With the loss of KG we turned into a much worse team, and STILL nearly made the ECFs. We were unlucky last year, and much, much better last year. Laker fans are retarded homers.

Perkins = Bynum HA. That's actually one of the most laughable things I've ever heard. It ranks only slightly behind...

KG = Gasol AHAHAHA. That is truly ridiculous.

Artest neutralizing Pierce? Why don't you check out some youtube clips and get back to me, chief.

Rondo f-ing destroys anything you guys have at PG. Its actually a slaughter, to the point where its not even fun to watch. Maybe you can switch Kobe onto him and have him disrespect his improving jump shot.

As for Odom and Rasheed.... we will see. We will see.

P.S. you're bench is a joke.
Grab a few boards, keep the TO's under 14, close out on shooters and we'll win.

Re: As it stands today, who is better, the lakers or the celtics
« Reply #59 on: July 31, 2009, 09:37:36 PM »

Offline Celticsman

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 19
  • Tommy Points: 1
  • Celtics Pride
09 Celtics were the best team in the league until KG went down. Everyone seems to forget how much we we're killing teams at the start of the year. Best start in NBA history, in case you forgot.

Q.
Celtics Pride from Rome, Italy