Author Topic: McDyess still a possibility?  (Read 4639 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

McDyess still a possibility?
« on: July 06, 2009, 08:33:59 AM »

Offline Drucci

  • Global Moderator
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7223
  • Tommy Points: 439
At first, in the early days of our offseason, I was thinking that signing McDyess would be a better move than signing Sheed. Now I've changed my mind and I'm excited to see Sheed play in green.

But our froncourt is still short, since we don't know if we will re-sign Big Baby. Basically, we have Perkins/Sheed at center and KG/Scalabrine at the 4 spot.

So, let's say we let Baby walk, do you think we could sign McDyess for the veteran minimum? He really wants a ring and maybe he would take his chance in Boston now that Sheed has signed with us, and since they've played together for years. I know that Dice is still considering Detroit, even after last year's debacle, and he could get big minutes there but if he wants a ring badly, he should consider Boston.

And, by the way, do you think that the management has talked to McDyess or consider signing him? I would be glad if we get him, although it just makes our team even older, our frontcourt would be just great.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2009, 08:35:16 AM »

Offline SSFan V

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 630
  • Tommy Points: 177
you are doing this to taunt me, aren't you! 
 :P
sometimes you have to bite your lip, exhale and move on.  So, I have.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2009, 09:37:17 AM »

Offline ssspence

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6375
  • Tommy Points: 403
At first, in the early days of our offseason, I was thinking that signing McDyess would be a better move than signing Sheed. Now I've changed my mind and I'm excited to see Sheed play in green.

But our froncourt is still short, since we don't know if we will re-sign Big Baby. Basically, we have Perkins/Sheed at center and KG/Scalabrine at the 4 spot.

So, let's say we let Baby walk, do you think we could sign McDyess for the veteran minimum? He really wants a ring and maybe he would take his chance in Boston now that Sheed has signed with us, and since they've played together for years. I know that Dice is still considering Detroit, even after last year's debacle, and he could get big minutes there but if he wants a ring badly, he should consider Boston.

And, by the way, do you think that the management has talked to McDyess or consider signing him? I would be glad if we get him, although it just makes our team even older, our frontcourt would be just great.

he'll get more than the min from a champ contender: san an, orlando, denver, cleveland.
Mike

(My name is not Mike)

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2009, 09:49:26 AM »

Offline the_Bird

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Tommy Points: 176
I bet San Antonio goes after him hard, now that they've lost out on 'Sheed.  I love 'Dice, and I'm pretty sure he was one of the guys that Danny's already inquired about, but hard to see him coming here to be the fourth big for little money.  Orlando might make a push, too; they've lost most of their big men behind Howard, Gortat's gone, Turk's gone, and Batman was traded. 
« Last Edit: July 06, 2009, 10:09:36 AM by the_Bird »

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2009, 09:53:25 AM »

Offline lostjumper

  • Lonnie Walker IV
  • Posts: 53
  • Tommy Points: 4
At first, in the early days of our offseason, I was thinking that signing McDyess would be a better move than signing Sheed. Now I've changed my mind and I'm excited to see Sheed play in green.

But our froncourt is still short, since we don't know if we will re-sign Big Baby. Basically, we have Perkins/Sheed at center and KG/Scalabrine at the 4 spot.

So, let's say we let Baby walk, do you think we could sign McDyess for the veteran minimum? He really wants a ring and maybe he would take his chance in Boston now that Sheed has signed with us, and since they've played together for years. I know that Dice is still considering Detroit, even after last year's debacle, and he could get big minutes there but if he wants a ring badly, he should consider Boston.

And, by the way, do you think that the management has talked to McDyess or consider signing him? I would be glad if we get him, although it just makes our team even older, our frontcourt would be just great.

he'll get more than the min from a champ contender: san an, orlando, denver, cleveland.

I'd have to imagine that one of the other contenders can pay Dice more than the vet minimum, which would be all we could pay him if its true we've given the bi-annual exception to Grant Hill. Cav's and SA need help at the 4/5, and with SA he could even be in the mix to start at the 5 next to Duncan. And while the C's have an excellent shot at a title, so do other teams who can pay more money.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2009, 09:57:22 AM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
At first, in the early days of our offseason, I was thinking that signing McDyess would be a better move than signing Sheed. Now I've changed my mind and I'm excited to see Sheed play in green.

But our froncourt is still short, since we don't know if we will re-sign Big Baby. Basically, we have Perkins/Sheed at center and KG/Scalabrine at the 4 spot.

So, let's say we let Baby walk, do you think we could sign McDyess for the veteran minimum? He really wants a ring and maybe he would take his chance in Boston now that Sheed has signed with us, and since they've played together for years. I know that Dice is still considering Detroit, even after last year's debacle, and he could get big minutes there but if he wants a ring badly, he should consider Boston.

And, by the way, do you think that the management has talked to McDyess or consider signing him? I would be glad if we get him, although it just makes our team even older, our frontcourt would be just great.

he'll get more than the min from a champ contender: san an, orlando, denver, cleveland.

I'd have to imagine that one of the other contenders can pay Dice more than the vet minimum, which would be all we could pay him if its true we've given the bi-annual exception to Grant Hill. Cav's and SA need help at the 4/5, and with SA he could even be in the mix to start at the 5 next to Duncan. And while the C's have an excellent shot at a title, so do other teams who can pay more money.
Well if SA signs Baby to the full MLE like Tanguay was saying then they will only be able to offer the LLE, which is around what we could offer him. I think Orlando or Cleveland are the best bets.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2009, 10:38:35 AM »

Offline Marqui

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 127
  • Tommy Points: 6
To be honest, Id rather start focusing on younger players at this point.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2009, 10:49:10 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
At first, in the early days of our offseason, I was thinking that signing McDyess would be a better move than signing Sheed. Now I've changed my mind and I'm excited to see Sheed play in green.

But our froncourt is still short, since we don't know if we will re-sign Big Baby. Basically, we have Perkins/Sheed at center and KG/Scalabrine at the 4 spot.

So, let's say we let Baby walk, do you think we could sign McDyess for the veteran minimum? He really wants a ring and maybe he would take his chance in Boston now that Sheed has signed with us, and since they've played together for years. I know that Dice is still considering Detroit, even after last year's debacle, and he could get big minutes there but if he wants a ring badly, he should consider Boston.

And, by the way, do you think that the management has talked to McDyess or consider signing him? I would be glad if we get him, although it just makes our team even older, our frontcourt would be just great.

he'll get more than the min from a champ contender: san an, orlando, denver, cleveland.

I'd have to imagine that one of the other contenders can pay Dice more than the vet minimum, which would be all we could pay him if its true we've given the bi-annual exception to Grant Hill. Cav's and SA need help at the 4/5, and with SA he could even be in the mix to start at the 5 next to Duncan. And while the C's have an excellent shot at a title, so do other teams who can pay more money.
Well if SA signs Baby to the full MLE like Tanguay was saying then they will only be able to offer the LLE, which is around what we could offer him. I think Orlando or Cleveland are the best bets.
I don't think San Antonio is going to overpay for BBD. Spurs might make an offer, but it won't be the full MLE. Gary doesn't really know how things work in the NBA with regards to salary.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2009, 11:28:43 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
To be honest, Id rather start focusing on younger players at this point.


What young player out there is going to sign for the vet minimal?  I mean one that will matter long term.


Right now, the Celtics have the right focus, title contending bench. 


Worry about youth and the next Celtics rebuilding project when they get there.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2009, 11:44:51 AM »

Offline timepiece33

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1747
  • Tommy Points: 78
Unlikely.  I just don't believe that a minimum or LLE contract for us will be his best option.   

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2009, 12:42:21 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53038
  • Tommy Points: 2574
I think McDyess is heading to San Antonio

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2009, 12:48:44 PM »

Offline CelticWes34

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 121
  • Tommy Points: 20
Not sure where McDyess winds up but I am sure it will not be in Boston. Like others have stated, he can easily command more than the minimum from other teams. I look for him to either re-sign in Detroit or sign with the Spurs, Cavs or Magic.
Carl: And, technically, he's supposed to be spayed, and uh, he ain't that. I know that first hand. Go ahead, ask me how I know. Go ahead. Ask me. Ask me how I know.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2009, 12:49:57 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Unlikely.  I just don't believe that a minimum or LLE contract for us will be his best option.   
Add to that his becoming the 4th big, and it is really unappealing for him.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2009, 01:15:18 PM »

Offline QuinielaBox

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Tommy Points: 139
What about a sign and trade with Detroit - Tony Allen, Brian Scalabrine, a draft pick and JR Giddens?

That would be more than the Vet Min.
Wins are few, times are hard. Here is your bleeping St Patricks Day Card.

Re: McDyess still a possibility?
« Reply #14 on: July 06, 2009, 01:16:43 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
What about a sign and trade with Detroit - Tony Allen, Brian Scalabrine, a draft pick and JR Giddens?

That would be more than the Vet Min.

Detroit doesn't have McDyess' Bird Rights, and I don't think they have the cap space to pull this off.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions