0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
wow, artest with the lakers makes them a much better team than having ariza or odom, IMHO. think about how we've torched them with pierce in the past because they've had no solid defender at SF. if this happens, the subplot of Artest vs Pierce is much more interesting than it ever was when he was with the Pacers.
I think Broussard is sharing the worst kept secret in the league with us. It's a done deal IMO, moving on...Quote from: screwedupmaniac on July 02, 2009, 06:25:54 PMwow, artest with the lakers makes them a much better team than having ariza or odom, IMHO. think about how we've torched them with pierce in the past because they've had no solid defender at SF. if this happens, the subplot of Artest vs Pierce is much more interesting than it ever was when he was with the Pacers.I just can't imagine Artest on the Lakers.
Has Broussard been reliable recently? Because I know him only for claiming that Cavs are so much better with Shaq, that they are going to sign the whole free agency with the MLE, etc, etc.
Quote from: Drucci on July 02, 2009, 06:28:14 PMHas Broussard been reliable recently? Because I know him only for claiming that Cavs are so much better with Shaq, that they are going to sign the whole free agency with the MLE, etc, etc. When the Shaq trade was announced, Chris Broussard actually said that it gave Cleveland a Big Three: LeBron, Shaq, and Mo Williams. I stopped laughing only about five minutes ago.
His whole point was that all of the teams talking to Sheed can only offer him the MLE.So it isn't going to come down to money.
Artest to LA is the worst news i read in a month. He is a solid and young player, a very good defender, the good man for a championship franchise. We maybe got another 35 years old big man, injury prone... Ehi Danny, wake up!