I think Memphis did OK I guess, but I'm not too optimistic about Thabeet. At best he'll probably be a poor-man's Dikembe with very little offense. But he'll give them a decent backup C for Gasol at least.
I like OKC next year with Westbrook, Harden, Durant, Green and whatever-center-they-can-get. Still, I think they ought to have taken Rubio. Teams are really going to regret letting him slip to #5 in my opinion. OKC really could have been something special with Rubio feeding passes to Durant all day long.
I want to say the T-Wolves but Flynn / Rubio just doesn't make sense to me. Maybe if I see it in action I'll warm up to it. Wayne Ellington was a good value at 29. Still, with the 5 and 6 I feel like their back court isn't as good as it could have been (imagine if they had ended up with Curry and Harden for example). I really don't understand why they didn't take Curry - they had one of the worst shooting teams in the league last year, so getting the best shooter in the draft would've been great for that I would have thought. Getting the future first was a nice move, though, considering that next year's draft will likely be much better than this one.
The Warriors did well to take Curry instead of Jordan Hill. Curry will have a great time in Don Nelson's fast paced, small ball, shoot-first-and-play-defense-later system. Maybe not as much fun as with D'Antoni, but close. Especially if the Warriors can get Amare. The Wolves are going to regret not taking Curry.
The Spurs did well taking DeJuan Blair who somehow plummeted like a rock in the draft because of worries about his knees. They need energy and youth up front and Blair could very well give them that.
It's hard to say who else did well besides that, because outside of the top 9 or 10 it's a stretch to say that any of those guys will be better than backups.