Author Topic: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?  (Read 11184 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #30 on: June 04, 2009, 10:39:32 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52961
  • Tommy Points: 2570
Nope, no chance.

If the Celtics weren't willing to pay him this money last offseason, there's no chance they'll be willing to pay it to him now ... especially after Posey's best season under that contract has already passed us by. The deal is worse today than it was 12 months ago as a result.

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #31 on: June 04, 2009, 10:49:30 AM »

Offline waltzero

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 108
  • Tommy Points: 10
You don't think we beat the Cavs tim? We've had their number for a while now, and we beat them without KG in that last game, and they wanted it bad.

your entire post that you've decided to attack me not agreeing with you on

Get over it fella, the only personal attack in that post is line 1 and I ignored a lot more of the middle school disrespect from you before I went there.

so which is it? your argument, if it can be called that, is changing every post.

Ok three final points dude.

I'm fine with your lack of reading comprehension and the record speaking for itself. Some day hopefully you will learn to take it as well as you dish it. And finally, I'm not going to defend things I did not argue just because you think I argued them because you read too fast or something, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #32 on: June 04, 2009, 10:56:11 AM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
You don't think we beat the Cavs tim? We've had their number for a while now, and we beat them without KG in that last game, and they wanted it bad.

your entire post that you've decided to attack me not agreeing with you on

Get over it fella, the only personal attack in that post is line 1 and I ignored a lot more of the middle school disrespect from you before I went there.

so which is it? your argument, if it can be called that, is changing every post.

Ok three final points dude.

I'm fine with your lack of reading comprehension and the record speaking for itself. Some day hopefully you will learn to take it as well as you dish it. And finally, I'm not going to defend things I did not argue just because you think I argued them because you read too fast or something, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Whatever you need to tell yourself for justification my man, i could really care less, its not worth my time to "defend" a post that did nothing but attack what i consider a bad analogy.

I'm not going to engage you in discussion anymore, since you clearly can't handle some aspect of the discussion part of discussion boards if you cant separate disagreeing with an analogy you used from attacking you the poster.

I'll keep my "middle school opinions" as you called them to myself with regards to things you post, sorry for ruining your day by disagreeing with an unsupported theory. 

Welcome and enjoy your time on the boards, but this kind of anger is not the way to attempt to make your points....anyway, have fun!





 
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #33 on: June 04, 2009, 11:03:55 AM »

Offline waltzero

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 108
  • Tommy Points: 10
Wow talk about irony...

I do hate being misquoted though. You put quotes around "middle school opinions" and I never said that.
You attacked him as having a mental defect. There is a difference.

Oh for the love of...look at the replay ref.

I said he was 'being retarded on purpose' not that he was retarded. I was obviously getting trolled; Pose came down to a simple yes or no question and he was trolling by saying it was exactly equivalent to Bird Man + Dwanye Wade for Ray and Scal.

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #34 on: June 04, 2009, 11:08:22 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
You attacked him as having a mental defect. There is a difference.

Oh for the love of...look at the replay ref.

I said he was 'being retarded on purpose' not that he was retarded. I was obviously getting trolled; Pose came down to a simple yes or no question and he was trolling by saying it was exactly equivalent to Bird Man + Dwanye Wade for Ray and Scal.
You're arguing semantics when your intent to insult is clear, you won't win any points that way.

You could have said he was trolling, or that he was confusing the issue by bringing Wade into it. Instead you went with a word that is extremely insulting to refer to his intelligence. Unless you're refering to the retarding of a process or system if you using the word you mean it as an insult.

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #35 on: June 04, 2009, 11:11:01 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Wow talk about irony...

I do hate being misquoted though. You put quotes around "middle school opinions" and I never said that.
You attacked him as having a mental defect. There is a difference.

Oh for the love of...look at the replay ref.

I said he was 'being retarded on purpose' not that he was retarded. I was obviously getting trolled; Pose came down to a simple yes or no question and he was trolling by saying it was exactly equivalent to Bird Man + Dwanye Wade for Ray and Scal.

Enough.  The original post was edited, because it was inappropriate.  You can disagree with posters, but please do so in a respectful manner.  The other alternative, of course, is to ignore them if you feel they're baiting / trolling you.

Everyone should get back on track, now.  There's no need to go off-topic in a thread like this.


All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #36 on: June 04, 2009, 03:36:08 PM »

Offline paintitgreen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Tommy Points: 156
Let me try to get this back on track with an actual proposal for people's review. Warning - there is a lot of financial discussion, since that aspect is fascinating to me and really what makes trades work.

While it's impossible to say what would have happened with Posey here this year (and absolutely makes no difference anyway since he wasn't here, and our season is over), I personally think he can still give us one more good year as a top quality sixth man to help us win a title in 2010. His salary is the concern obviously, since we'll increase our luxury tax this year if we take on more salary, and we'll be paying him $6.45 million in 2010-11 and $6.9 million in 2011-12. That could easily be considered $12.9 and 13.8 million with the luxury tax considered.

I, however, prefer to look at the percentage of our salary by which we exceed the luxury level (x), and attribute that additional cost to each player so it's not that KG costs $18.8 million in 10-11 and Posey costs $12.9, but rather KG costs $18.8 million times (1+x) and Posey costs $6.45 million times (1+x), etc. But that's just personal choice and too complicated without all figures known. I will analyze this by adding a 25% figure with respect to new additions to our roster, which is higher than our actual likely excess over the luxury level. With a $70 million luxury level - $1.15 mil less than last year - our total salary would have to be $87.5 million to put us 25% over the luxury level. We're at $73,376,991 currently without counting Pruitt's team option (I think $82 is possible, even likely, but not $87) and at $44,726,729 in 10-11 counting only KG, Pierce and Perk.

So, I will assume Posey's contract actually costs us 25% more with luxury tax implications. That means Posey costs about $8.1 million in 2010-11 and $8.7 milion in 2011-12. (I'll get to 2009-10 below.) That's a huge burden, since I figure he'll actually only be worth about $4.5 million in 10-11 and maybe $3 million in 11-12 (about $9.3 million of overpaying). Maybe we can remedy some of that last figure with a buyout in the final season or by using the expiring $6.9 million as a trade chip. But for now, I'll say it's $9.3 million of overpaying.

That is why I think we need to get much more than just Posey. Taking on Posey (who has similar cost problems for New Orleans - $77,575,998 in salary next year, $64,696,130 in 10-11, $31,097,580 in 11-12 for just Posey, West and Paul) is a big burden, so we have to get additional assets. From my perspective, I want a first rounder (maybe this year - number 21 I think) or even two, and Julian Wright, a guy I'm big on and who I think can help us next year, and step into Posey's sixth man role in 10-11 and maybe more beyond (we'd have him through 10-11 at $2 mil next year, $2.85 in 10-11 (TO) and he'd be a RFA in 11-12 with a $4 mil qualifying offer).

Their combined salary for 09-10 is $8,031,840. Under the CBA rules, New Orleans can take back no more than $10,139,800. If we're getting that salary, we have to send out at least $6,345,472 under the CBA.

Let's say New Orleans is interested in Big Baby, an LSU guy who can give backup minutes at the 4 and even the 5. He agrees to a sign and trade with a long term deal that starts at around $4.9 million (10% raises would make it roughly 5 and $30 mil - if that's more than what's allowed, my numbers may be off, but I think with an early-Bird it's doable). So let's say, regardless of the length of the contract, it starts at that figure. It counts as $4,900,00 going into New Orleans and $2,450,000 going out for us (under the rules Roy has eloquently and kindly explained). To make it work out, we need to send out at least $3,895,472 more and New Orleans can take on no more than $5,239,800 more. Also consider, since this is very much about cost savings for New Orleans, they want to take on as little salary as possible, so they probably want to stick close to that $3,895,472 and they want the deals to be expiring.

Thing is, we actually have some mix and match options to make this work. We take the option on Pruitt and give them Scal and Pruitt - that's $4,239,290 which fits in the range. Tony Allen, Pruitt and Walker works too ($4,061,917). (I don't like dealing Walker, but the addition of Wright makes him a bit more dispensable.) Eddie House and JR Giddens could also be plugged in under various circumstances, but then we lose Eddie, who we know works with Posey. So for now, I'll choose the Davis-Scal-Pruitt option. Also keep in mind that with Davis being involved in a sign and trade, we'd have to get a 2010 first rounder, since we can't make this trade before July and the draft is this month. (Maybe we also get a conditional 2012 first rounder - top 20 protected for 2 years; otherwise it becomes a second).


Now for financial implications. I'll analyze it in two ways - one, assuming we would have resigned Davis at the price above and another assuming we would have just let him walk. In both cases I will assume we would resign Scalabrine in 2010-11 and 11-12 for $2 million a year. That's a big assumption but somewhat realistic considering that we like Scal, and for a veteran "clubhouse" guy who knows the system and can play the 5th big role, $2 million seems realistic.


Alternative A. Assuming we would otherwise resign Davis, we take no cap hit this year. Scal and Davis would cost a total of $8,313,793 next year (we don't have to take the option on Pruitt otherwise, so that's not really any savings); Posey and Wright cost about $280,000 less - $350,000 using my 25% tax bonus. However, since New Orleans' salary would go up by $1,107,450 (adding in Pruitt) they'd probably want money to offset the added costs. So let's say they want a payment of $1,250,000.  In that case, the deal costs us about $900,000 next year (since it's because of a cash payment, no further luxury tax adjustment is necessary).

In 2010-11, it changes. Using a 10% raise for Davis, he'd make $5,390,000 in 10-11. With Scal at $2, that's $7,390,000 in salary. Posey and Wright will earn $9,336,656 that year. That's a difference of $1,946,656. Let's say the draft pick is about number 20 and earns about $1.35 million in 2010-11. That brings the cost up to about $3.3 million, and with the luxury tax implications, about $4,125,000.

In 2011-12, we have to deal with Wright's free agency. I will assume (again a big one) we resign him for about what we'd be paying Davis had we kept Davis. So the difference comes down to $6,925,400 for Posey and $1.5 mil for the 2010 first v. $2 million for Scalabrine (keep in mind at that point they'll probably be filling the same 5th big role, I actually think Posey will do it better and can be a trade chip with his expiring contract). That's a difference of $6,425,400, or $8,031,750 using the 25% luxury tax charge. 


Alternative B. Assuming we'd let Davis walk, we take a pretty big financial hit next year since we're basically only clearing Scal from our books, so we tack on about $4.62 million in salary (about $5.77 million with the luxury tax) to replace Scalabrine with James Posey and Julian Wright. However, New Orleans still takes the cap hit because of Davis and Pruitt, so they still want the $1.25 mil, making it more like $7 million.

In 2010-11, that difference would grow to about $7,336,656 (assuming the $2 mil to Scal we'd spend otherwise), or $9,170,820 with the luxury tax. In 2011-12, assuming Wright is resigned to a contract starting at about $5.95 million (which was the number I had for Davis), and the 2010 first rounder makes about $1.5 million, our salary increases by $12,375,400, or about $15,469,250 with the tax.


So depending on what you would otherwise do with Davis this summer, the trade comes down to either (A) three years of Scalabrine and Davis locked up plus about $13 million for three years of Posey, Julian Wright locked up and a 2010 first rounder from New Orleans or (B) three years of Scalabrine and about $31.6 million for three years of Posey, Julian Wright locked up and a 2010 first rounder from New Orleans. (Keep in mind, if Wright doesn't pan out and we don't resign him, we get him for two years and it costs us about $7.5 million less in either scenario.) Those amounts include the salaries we would be paying these guys, cash payment of $1.25 mil to New Orleans, AND luxury tax implications.

Personally, I value the draft pick, which could be in the high teens or early twenties where Ainge has had great success, at at least $5 million (I think the salary is worth paying, and I'd pay more than $2 mil to get the pick). Without considering salary (and the above analysis negates salary differentials), if I could trade the next three years of Scalabrine for the next three years of Posey (and get a huge expiring contract trade chip for the future), I would pay at least $9 million to make that move because I consider it a huge upgrade for a team in position to win now.

So to me, the Celtics get about a million in value to swap Davis for Wright, and I would personally rather have Wright than Davis. (Under scenario B I'm paying about $9.5 million for the next two years of Julian Wright plus whatever I'd pay to lock him after that, which I would do since I think he's a very good player on both ends who fills many needs now and in the future). The way I see it we suddenly have two more guys who can throw minutes at Lebron and can defend Turkoglu and Lewis. Wright might be an elite wing defender in a couple years with the size to defend in the post too. And he has the skill to be a difference maker on offense. Being next to another great Jayhawk small forward will benefit him immensely. So yeah, I'd do the deal.

09-10 lineup
Rondo    ______
R Allen  House    T Allen    Giddens
Pierce   Posey    J Wright   Walker
Garnett  ______   _______
Perkins  ______

Obviously, we'd still have to fill our frontcourt (Powe is a good, likely cheap option as the 5th) and backup point spots, but we haven't used any MLE or LLE money, and we still have the expiring contracts of TA and House, plus Giddens and Walker, and our wings are absolutely set and highly flexible giving us the option to go big or small. I'd sign Marbury to short money, Powe to a cheap deal, and use the MLE to address the frontcourt (Posey and Wright can probably fill about 15-20 minutes at the 4 anyway).

But I'll put it to you guys. Do you make that trade?
Go Celtics.

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #37 on: June 04, 2009, 07:58:23 PM »

Offline wiley

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4855
  • Tommy Points: 386
Let me try to get this back on track with an actual proposal for people's review. Warning - there is a lot of financial discussion, since that aspect is fascinating to me and really what makes trades work.

While it's impossible to say what would have happened with Posey here this year (and absolutely makes no difference anyway since he wasn't here, and our season is over), I personally think he can still give us one more good year as a top quality sixth man to help us win a title in 2010. His salary is the concern obviously, since we'll increase our luxury tax this year if we take on more salary, and we'll be paying him $6.45 million in 2010-11 and $6.9 million in 2011-12. That could easily be considered $12.9 and 13.8 million with the luxury tax considered.

I, however, prefer to look at the percentage of our salary by which we exceed the luxury level (x), and attribute that additional cost to each player so it's not that KG costs $18.8 million in 10-11 and Posey costs $12.9, but rather KG costs $18.8 million times (1+x) and Posey costs $6.45 million times (1+x), etc. But that's just personal choice and too complicated without all figures known. I will analyze this by adding a 25% figure with respect to new additions to our roster, which is higher than our actual likely excess over the luxury level. With a $70 million luxury level - $1.15 mil less than last year - our total salary would have to be $87.5 million to put us 25% over the luxury level. We're at $73,376,991 currently without counting Pruitt's team option (I think $82 is possible, even likely, but not $87) and at $44,726,729 in 10-11 counting only KG, Pierce and Perk.

So, I will assume Posey's contract actually costs us 25% more with luxury tax implications. That means Posey costs about $8.1 million in 2010-11 and $8.7 milion in 2011-12. (I'll get to 2009-10 below.) That's a huge burden, since I figure he'll actually only be worth about $4.5 million in 10-11 and maybe $3 million in 11-12 (about $9.3 million of overpaying). Maybe we can remedy some of that last figure with a buyout in the final season or by using the expiring $6.9 million as a trade chip. But for now, I'll say it's $9.3 million of overpaying.

That is why I think we need to get much more than just Posey. Taking on Posey (who has similar cost problems for New Orleans - $77,575,998 in salary next year, $64,696,130 in 10-11, $31,097,580 in 11-12 for just Posey, West and Paul) is a big burden, so we have to get additional assets. From my perspective, I want a first rounder (maybe this year - number 21 I think) or even two, and Julian Wright, a guy I'm big on and who I think can help us next year, and step into Posey's sixth man role in 10-11 and maybe more beyond (we'd have him through 10-11 at $2 mil next year, $2.85 in 10-11 (TO) and he'd be a RFA in 11-12 with a $4 mil qualifying offer).

Their combined salary for 09-10 is $8,031,840. Under the CBA rules, New Orleans can take back no more than $10,139,800. If we're getting that salary, we have to send out at least $6,345,472 under the CBA.

Let's say New Orleans is interested in Big Baby, an LSU guy who can give backup minutes at the 4 and even the 5. He agrees to a sign and trade with a long term deal that starts at around $4.9 million (10% raises would make it roughly 5 and $30 mil - if that's more than what's allowed, my numbers may be off, but I think with an early-Bird it's doable). So let's say, regardless of the length of the contract, it starts at that figure. It counts as $4,900,00 going into New Orleans and $2,450,000 going out for us (under the rules Roy has eloquently and kindly explained). To make it work out, we need to send out at least $3,895,472 more and New Orleans can take on no more than $5,239,800 more. Also consider, since this is very much about cost savings for New Orleans, they want to take on as little salary as possible, so they probably want to stick close to that $3,895,472 and they want the deals to be expiring.

Thing is, we actually have some mix and match options to make this work. We take the option on Pruitt and give them Scal and Pruitt - that's $4,239,290 which fits in the range. Tony Allen, Pruitt and Walker works too ($4,061,917). (I don't like dealing Walker, but the addition of Wright makes him a bit more dispensable.) Eddie House and JR Giddens could also be plugged in under various circumstances, but then we lose Eddie, who we know works with Posey. So for now, I'll choose the Davis-Scal-Pruitt option. Also keep in mind that with Davis being involved in a sign and trade, we'd have to get a 2010 first rounder, since we can't make this trade before July and the draft is this month. (Maybe we also get a conditional 2012 first rounder - top 20 protected for 2 years; otherwise it becomes a second).


Now for financial implications. I'll analyze it in two ways - one, assuming we would have resigned Davis at the price above and another assuming we would have just let him walk. In both cases I will assume we would resign Scalabrine in 2010-11 and 11-12 for $2 million a year. That's a big assumption but somewhat realistic considering that we like Scal, and for a veteran "clubhouse" guy who knows the system and can play the 5th big role, $2 million seems realistic.


Alternative A. Assuming we would otherwise resign Davis, we take no cap hit this year. Scal and Davis would cost a total of $8,313,793 next year (we don't have to take the option on Pruitt otherwise, so that's not really any savings); Posey and Wright cost about $280,000 less - $350,000 using my 25% tax bonus. However, since New Orleans' salary would go up by $1,107,450 (adding in Pruitt) they'd probably want money to offset the added costs. So let's say they want a payment of $1,250,000.  In that case, the deal costs us about $900,000 next year (since it's because of a cash payment, no further luxury tax adjustment is necessary).

In 2010-11, it changes. Using a 10% raise for Davis, he'd make $5,390,000 in 10-11. With Scal at $2, that's $7,390,000 in salary. Posey and Wright will earn $9,336,656 that year. That's a difference of $1,946,656. Let's say the draft pick is about number 20 and earns about $1.35 million in 2010-11. That brings the cost up to about $3.3 million, and with the luxury tax implications, about $4,125,000.

In 2011-12, we have to deal with Wright's free agency. I will assume (again a big one) we resign him for about what we'd be paying Davis had we kept Davis. So the difference comes down to $6,925,400 for Posey and $1.5 mil for the 2010 first v. $2 million for Scalabrine (keep in mind at that point they'll probably be filling the same 5th big role, I actually think Posey will do it better and can be a trade chip with his expiring contract). That's a difference of $6,425,400, or $8,031,750 using the 25% luxury tax charge. 


Alternative B. Assuming we'd let Davis walk, we take a pretty big financial hit next year since we're basically only clearing Scal from our books, so we tack on about $4.62 million in salary (about $5.77 million with the luxury tax) to replace Scalabrine with James Posey and Julian Wright. However, New Orleans still takes the cap hit because of Davis and Pruitt, so they still want the $1.25 mil, making it more like $7 million.

In 2010-11, that difference would grow to about $7,336,656 (assuming the $2 mil to Scal we'd spend otherwise), or $9,170,820 with the luxury tax. In 2011-12, assuming Wright is resigned to a contract starting at about $5.95 million (which was the number I had for Davis), and the 2010 first rounder makes about $1.5 million, our salary increases by $12,375,400, or about $15,469,250 with the tax.


So depending on what you would otherwise do with Davis this summer, the trade comes down to either (A) three years of Scalabrine and Davis locked up plus about $13 million for three years of Posey, Julian Wright locked up and a 2010 first rounder from New Orleans or (B) three years of Scalabrine and about $31.6 million for three years of Posey, Julian Wright locked up and a 2010 first rounder from New Orleans. (Keep in mind, if Wright doesn't pan out and we don't resign him, we get him for two years and it costs us about $7.5 million less in either scenario.) Those amounts include the salaries we would be paying these guys, cash payment of $1.25 mil to New Orleans, AND luxury tax implications.

Personally, I value the draft pick, which could be in the high teens or early twenties where Ainge has had great success, at at least $5 million (I think the salary is worth paying, and I'd pay more than $2 mil to get the pick). Without considering salary (and the above analysis negates salary differentials), if I could trade the next three years of Scalabrine for the next three years of Posey (and get a huge expiring contract trade chip for the future), I would pay at least $9 million to make that move because I consider it a huge upgrade for a team in position to win now.

So to me, the Celtics get about a million in value to swap Davis for Wright, and I would personally rather have Wright than Davis. (Under scenario B I'm paying about $9.5 million for the next two years of Julian Wright plus whatever I'd pay to lock him after that, which I would do since I think he's a very good player on both ends who fills many needs now and in the future). The way I see it we suddenly have two more guys who can throw minutes at Lebron and can defend Turkoglu and Lewis. Wright might be an elite wing defender in a couple years with the size to defend in the post too. And he has the skill to be a difference maker on offense. Being next to another great Jayhawk small forward will benefit him immensely. So yeah, I'd do the deal.

09-10 lineup
Rondo    ______
R Allen  House    T Allen    Giddens
Pierce   Posey    J Wright   Walker
Garnett  ______   _______
Perkins  ______

Obviously, we'd still have to fill our frontcourt (Powe is a good, likely cheap option as the 5th) and backup point spots, but we haven't used any MLE or LLE money, and we still have the expiring contracts of TA and House, plus Giddens and Walker, and our wings are absolutely set and highly flexible giving us the option to go big or small. I'd sign Marbury to short money, Powe to a cheap deal, and use the MLE to address the frontcourt (Posey and Wright can probably fill about 15-20 minutes at the 4 anyway).

But I'll put it to you guys. Do you make that trade?

If J. Wright is good like you say then yes, please do it.  I'm in favor of TWO Posey types as well, and replacing Baby with a near 7 footer or two, or McDyess.

One danger to winning championship again is Pierce fatigue, and a single Posey type might not get him the rest he needs during the year, and what if his replacement gets hurt?  I'd love to have Posey and Wright, or Posey and Nocioni, or Nocioni and Wright, or Posey and Kleiza, etc....

TP for your post.

Re: Any chance the C's try to regain Posey?
« Reply #38 on: June 04, 2009, 09:30:51 PM »

Offline paintitgreen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Tommy Points: 156
Other people might not like Wright as much as I do, but I'm a big fan. He's young (just turned 22), has good size for a wing (6'8", 225), and plays good defense. His outside game is not there (only 12 for 45, .267, in his 111 career games), but he has solid finish around the basket and is very athletic. Due to his shooting problems last year, his PER dropped from 15.48 as a rookie to 12.66 last year, but he really shined the only times he was really given extended minutes (in March 09, he averaged 8 points, 4.6 boards, an assist, a steal, a turnover and .7 blocks in 23.6 minutes a game, shooting .500 from the field - still couldn't hit 3s though; in March 08 he averaged 7.3 points, 3.2 boards, an assist, a steal, a turnover in 19 minutes a game, shooting .533 from the field). I don't think he's ready right now for much other than defense, but he'd be available as a body you could play and he has bright hopes for the future. Leaving Kansas after his freshman year, he was Third Team All American, could score, rebound and was a good passer, and often handled for the Jayhawks.

Hollinger's report:

Quote
2007-08 season: Unearthed from the bench late in the season, Wright was incredibly productive in his limited minutes and in retrospect should have played much more than he did. Wright shot 53.3 percent from the floor and ranked in the top 10 among small forwards in true shooting percentage, rebound rate and steals per minute.

Limiting him from playing more was an inability shoot from outside. Though he hit a decent percentage, he rarely shot from deep and was heartily encouraged to fire away by opponents. Additionally, he had a very high turnover ratio -- a good omen for future development, actually, since high-turnover rookies tend to have better careers, but a bad thing in 2007-08.

Scouting report: A long, active defender who looks like future stopper material, Wright is big for a wing at 6-8 but has the quickness and leaping ability to pester much smaller players. He also rebounds like a power forward and might be able to play there eventually once he adds some more bulk.

Offensively, Wright is a deadly finisher in transition but strictly a slasher in the half court. While he can handle the ball and sees the floor reasonably well, his erratic jumper forces him to drive into congested areas, so turnovers are a problem. Additionally, he only shot 63.5 percent from the line -- that has to improve.

2008-09 outlook: Wright has earned a more substantial role based on his strong rookie play, but he may have trouble getting more than scraps of minutes. The additions of James Posey and Devin Brown could crowd him out of minutes on the wings, especially since the Hornets seem determined to space the floor with shooters around Chris Paul -- an area that is Wright's greatest weakness.

It's possible Wright plays so well that they just can't keep him off the court -- his limited rookie stint was that impressive -- but as a natural small forward whose primary position is manned by Posey and Peja Stojakovic, it's going to be an uphill battle.
Go Celtics.