Could the Celtics have been a "deeper" team last year?
It would have been nice to be deeper.
But once we designed the team around the Big 3 our options were limited.
Remember all the talk after the KG trade about the Bench?
We had no cap space. [In 2009 the big 3 cost us 60 million against a 58 million cap.]
We forgot about the cap space issue because the Celtics got all of the best veteran players who wanted to play "cheap" for a winner - Posey, House and Brown.
For whatever reason, that didn't happen in 2009.
McDyss preferred Detroit.
Smith preferred the Cav's, etc.
The best cheap veterans didn't want the Celtics in 2009.
It shouldn't have been that way.
The Celtics won 2008.
That should have attracted more veterans who wanted to win.
But it didn't! Something about the Celtics culture turned off guys like McDyss, Smith, etc.
Anyone have any ideas for why the best veteran free agents didn't want to play here?
I lean towards "the poor sportmanship rap". Trashing talking, cheap shots etc.
Don't know what else it could be. Again, suggestions?
In 2009, the big 3 cost us 60.25 million against a 58 million cap.
In 2010, the big 3 will cost us 55.0 million against a 57 million cap.
But in 2010 we need to pay Davis more, at least $5 million [vs less than a million last year.] and Rondo will be getting a huge pay increase probably more than $11 to $13 million to pay him like a top 5 point guard. [if we don't give him a big pay increase we probably lose him as a restricted free agent after next season.]
So, bottom line, no real improvement in the roster unless one or more of the Big 3 is traded.
The question becomes: can we win a championship with our current roster?
If we can't win with this roster or something very close to it, do we break up the team, trade one or more of the Big 3?