Lets go back to the Red Lobster analogy. I know all of you love it.
Aren't Red Lobster the haters? I went in and did what I was supposed to do, paid for a meal, they want customers right? And instead of them serving me my meal they stole my money. I didn't do anything wrong, they did and they did it first. Aren't they hating by not serving me my meal? Had they served me my coconut shrimp which was what they were supposed to do since I paid not only would I not be called a hater, I would get to enjoy my meal.
Now. Howard blocks Lebron. Its a block. Aren't the refs, the media and Lebron the haters? Howard did what he was supposed to do, Lebron and the Cavs want competition right? Someone to challenge them and be in their poster shot like Atlanta & Detroit. However Howard gets disqualified with 6 fouls. Had they made the correct call would Howard be called a complainer? Would Howard be called a hater. I don't think so. Enjoy that coconut shrimp.
So LeBron is like Red Lobster not serving a meal or giving me my money back because he took a shot and it was blocked by another player and someone who LeBron has no control over called it a foul instead of a block??
And all this is related to hating because......okay, I'll have to get back to this one because it still hasn't sunk in.
So if LeBron is Red Lobster...
that makes Howard the......meal? No, the money! No? ummm
Okay Howard is the customer getting screwed by ....the Red Lobster ...no, by LeBron...but LeBron's the Red Lobster.....who hates him because...?? Okay, I'm still not getting the hate part.
So where do the refs and the analysts fit in?
Are the refs the meal??...the money??...the waiter??... the menu??
And where does the [dang] hating fit into this sh.........stuff!!
[dang]...I'm confused.