Author Topic: Whos to Blame?  (Read 8153 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Whos to Blame?
« Reply #30 on: May 18, 2009, 10:15:37 PM »

Offline the_Bird

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Tommy Points: 176
He had nearly five million dollars locked up on players that did not contribute: Marbury, Moore, Walker, Pruitt, Giddens, Allen, and O'Bryant. It would have made more sense to spend that five million on one player who could get it done. Instead, we saw a multitude of scrubs.  

We couldn't just spend the combined salaries of those players.  Of the above listed players, only Marbury and Walker were signed using the MLE.  The rest were signed using exceptions:  Moore - minimum salary; Pruitt - already under contract; Giddens - rookie scale; Allen - Bird rights; O'Bryant - minimum salary (despite erroneous reports to the contrary).

Overall, though, I agree that the team wasted a lot of money last season on players that didn't produce.  The Tony Allen example, of course, is the best one; we could have had a player who is just as good (Quinton Ross) for the minimum.

I never understood the Tony Allen signing - Tony's complete failure this season makes me feel a helluva lot better about my own intelligence, because it was COMPLETELY expected!  He's a bad player with ongoing offcourt issues who still plays like a rookie in his first Summer League game. 

Ross is one that might have been a better fit; I was floored when Phoenix snagged Matt Barnes at the vet min.  Not a great player, but tough, energetic, good defender, not a bad 3-pt shooter, and cheaper!  Wouldn't have ultimately made any difference, though.

Probably wouldn't have been able to sign Joe Smith anyway, but I guess there was no need to rush the Mikki Moore signing...

Overall, it was just kind of a chintzy offseason.  If we had Pose and PJ Brown, I think we probably could have gotten by Orlando - but I can't see how we would have gotten past Cleveland.  It would have been five or six tough-fought games, but it would have been five or six tough games with us disappointed after four of them.  Given how much better Cleveland looks this year, I'm not sure how the '07 - '08 Celtics, fully healthy, would have fared versus the '08 - '09 Cavs. 

Re: Whos to Blame?
« Reply #31 on: May 18, 2009, 10:24:52 PM »

Offline TerreHaute

  • Anfernee Simons
  • Posts: 311
  • Tommy Points: 38
I don't think you can blame anyone for what happened. With a healthy roster as it was constructed, we would have a very legitimate chance at repeating.

With that said, this team was not as good as last year's team. The "bench story" was beaten to death all last summer and this season, starting when Posey was allowed to leave. I was one of those doing the beating.

We may not have won the title with a healthy KG because the bench was clearly not as strong. We will never know, for sure, because we didn't have our best player healthy. Let's just hope we get him healthy, and can change the bench players for next year so we get the chance to lift another banner.

Re: Whos to Blame?
« Reply #32 on: May 18, 2009, 10:33:51 PM »

Offline ChiCeltic

  • Amari Williams
  • Posts: 3
  • Tommy Points: 0
The Defense is to blame and that is where we missed our big guy. I'm glad this year is over, 14 playoff games of teams scoring their tails off was getting very old. Every game was tough to watch because we couldn't get stops.

Re: Whos to Blame?
« Reply #33 on: May 18, 2009, 11:25:55 PM »

Offline The Walker Wiggle

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4568
  • Tommy Points: 758
  • Pretend Hinkie
I blame the players out on the floor for Game 7, but that's me.