0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
BBD can handle Shaq. Just force him to shoot from more than 5 feet from the basket.
I'm not worried about Shaq. I'm worried about Stoudamire. BBD can handle Shaq. Just force him to shoot from more than 5 feet from the basket.
Quote from: Brickowski on January 18, 2009, 03:44:40 PMI'm not worried about Shaq. I'm worried about Stoudamire. BBD can handle Shaq. Just force him to shoot from more than 5 feet from the basket.Ohh so that's how you do it, I guess teams haven't tried that over the past sixteen years on him.Shaq has been the best player on the Suns this season. I've been able to catch a bunch of their games and he's having a very, very good season.
Every shot that Shaq takes is one less shot for Amare.
I wouldnt worry. No one can guard Shaq anyway. Shaqs performance depends on how well Shaq is feeling that day and how much energy he has to out strengthen the opposing player.
In response to a couple things:1) True, big stiff have always occurred, even before Shaq. The difference is that there are now more of them. Furthermore, a lot of them were drafted with Shaq in mind. I can still remember on the night Diop was drafted we (and the media) were talking about how he had the size and strength to stay with Shaq. 2) As far s Scalabine being a tough guard for Shaq, that's absolutely true. And that's why big stiffs don't work against Shaq. All they do is give him a license to sit under the basket. This is exactly how the C's beat the Sixers in 2001 or 2002 with Rodney Rodgers at center. Mutombo either had to drift out to guard Rodney, opening up the middle or if he didn't, Rodney hit wide open threes.Thus, I see no reason why we can't use the same game plan we've been using (Scal) against Phoenix.
Also - good chance we don't see Shaq at all, its been mentioned above, but he played against TOR yesterday, and typically that means sit today.