If we want to rest the starters more doesn't it make more sense just to concentrate on getting the starters to play better so that they can give large leads to the bench and perhaps not have to play a lot of minutes, if any, in the fourth quarter? Isn't it a more realistic goal and reachable to get the starters to play so well that they don't have to play in the 4th than it is to get three players who are not yet ready to play big time, meaningful, and important NBA minutes and produce?
When people talk about wanting to rest the starters as an objective and then instantly bring up playing the very far end of the bench, it makes me question what their original objectivereallt is, resting the starters or getting to see what unproven, unseen players really have to bring to the table.
You want to rest the starters, get them playing better quality basketball, get them handing over large leads to the bench and play the proven, NBA quality backups that are currently on the team more minutes. Just giving starters minutes to scrubs is, in the end after any blown leads, only going to result in the starters playing more minutes long term.