this is disgusting. we've killed with injuries and still win 60, and our players are scheduled to come back for the beginning of the playoffs... yet when we lose a meaningless game with Cleveland (a team we beat without KG) we're hopeless against them. What would have been the difference today if we had a 50% KG? i think it would have been closer, otherwise your saying BBD is more than half the man Kevin is (which he isn't) or maybe your saying that Mikki Moore is our glaring weakness? well how about when we have Leon and Baby to battle Joe Smith in the second unit matchup?
A FIRED UP 85% HEALTH CELTIC TEAM CAN BEAT THESE GUYS.
I believe that the CAVS are eerily similar to us last year. Remember that they didn't have a completely healthy Z last year and he is a very under rated player. Mo Williams was a big pickup. Most importantly though they play the hungry ferocious defense that we did last year. When was the last time you saw us come out with the defensive intensity in the first and third quarters like we used to? We used to win games in the first and third. Now we almost always are playing from behind because we can't come out focused. Even against bad teams. Say what you will, but there is no question they don't have the same level of hunger as they did last year. If you think they can just flip a switch in the EC finals you are sadly mistaken. You can't flip switches against teams that are as good or better than you are.
Edited for same reasons you point.
keep the conversation clean both and not continue on that fan status thing
Edgar
And in personal thinking
Isnt that what Atlanta does against us last year and almost beat us
ANY team can have 4 games of glory
Ask Golden State
Come on! You don't really expect us to believe that you think the CAVS are even remotely in the same league as Atlanta or Golden State?! If you are referring to us, then I am even more depressed...
This days with the simptoms of jumping off the ship we have around
yes I am refering to us
We are as good as any team in this league
If we are 100% healthy then I'd agree that we are right there. We aren't as good as last year though. I sure haven't been jumping on and off the bandwagon though because I was am the OP from 4 months ago and have been concerned about our depth. Look at these positions as objectively as you can and tell me we are the best:
Boston CAVS Lakers
PG - Rondo Williams Fisher - us and the Cavs are slightly ahead of LA
SG - Allen West Kobe - LA in a landslide
SF - Pierce Lebron ? - Cavs by a pretty good margin
PF - KG Varaejo Gasol - Gasols has stats and health. KG is better though
C - Perk Big Z Bynum - Probably a wash
Key Backups: Bos - BBD, POWE, House, Marbury
Cle - Gibson, Wally, Wallace, Joe Smith
LA - Ariza, Walton, Farmar, Powell
If you are talking starters, then the only one that we are arguably better at is at PF. With him not being 100% then that gives the edge IMO to LA and Gasol. The 2 best players on that list are not Celtics. As far as benches go we are talented, but small. The size is what hurts us otherwise I would say we are the best of the group, however Cleveland does have 3 former all-stars and one heck of a shooter in Gibson.
This is my rationale behind my worry. I am not going to put on blinders and pretend we are better than we are.