I remember when this book came out, I looked at it at the bookstore and thought it was crap. I never read it, so I can't give an opinion an the actual book, but here's my perceived problems with it:
It's about allegations, not facts. 40% of the NBA players have been arrested? That automatically portrays a negative image, but doesn't paint an accurate picture. Last I checked, people were innocent until proven guilty in the US, but books like this take the opposite approach. They try to make it seem like if someone is accused, he's guilty. It seemed he was using anecdotal evidence to draw broad conclusions. Just my opinion here, but I bet high paid entertainers are falsely accused way more than average people just because of the financial benefit of the accuser. Even if the accusation is completely bogus, a multi-million dollar entertainer is probably more likely to cut a check and settle out of court just to make sure it never sees the light of day. Kobe Bryant has never been convicted of rape, but now he'll probably always be thought of as a rapist. Even if that case went to trial, and Kobe was found not guilty, he would still be considered a rapist by most (like he is today), so it makes a whole lot of sense for a player to just cut a check. I've known some people that came into a little money, and then accusations started coming in so others could cash in too. Funny how those accusations never came about when the people I knew had nothing. You either cut a check or get you name forever linked with an offense you never even committed.
It seemed to be a way to capitalize on the Kobe Bryant rape case. It definitely came off like a hidden agenda, like he was trying to bring to light how corrupt the NBA is, when really he was just trying to get paid himself. Pretending to have righteous intents when you're only motive is money for yourself doesn't sit well with me.
It seemed he was saying today's NBA is terrible and absolutely corrupt, but the NBA of years past were a bunch of perfect role models. Personally, I always viewed this point of view as somewhat racist, now that the NBA is so much more hip hop centric, crime has now become rampant throughout because of it. How about all the cocaine use by players in the 80's and before, or how about guys like Karl Malone essentially statutorily raping a girl 20+ years ago? How about all the fights that used to happen on the NBA hardwood? He doesn't attack these things because then it wouldn't make it seem like hip hop and the urban vibe has corrupted the NBA as much as some would like us to believe.
What percentage of Senators and such have been arrested over this same time frame? It seems like I see Senators being accused more often in the news than pro athletes (just my opinion, I have no backing evidence for this). If you think athletes get things covered up and never see the light of day, what about these guys? Again I think it's just an attack on hip hop and the "blackness" of today's NBA, and an excuse to cash in on the Kobe case.
Again, I've never read the book, I picked it up at the bookstore, looked through it, and refused to support it. Of course maybe I'll try and pick it up at the library now. In no way am I saying the NBA is perfect, I know there are criminals in professional sports, but there's criminals in the Senate too, there's criminals everywhere. Go google "teacher arrested" and see how many news links come up. Don't try to make the NBA seem worse than it is and painting a negative image by focusing on accusations.