I respect what Sloan has accomplished as a coach and realize that what he's done hasn't been easy, and I know all about his coaching style and the type of attitude his teams possess. That being said, is it fair to call a coach who has coached in the NBA close to 23 seasons, and has yet to win an NBA championship, the best coach in the league? At the end of the day, it's about winning, isn't it? And by winning, I mean winning rings. It may be true that over the last 20 years the Jazz have been the mark of stability and consistency, while the Celtics franchise has languished under the direction of coaches whose names don't belong in the same sentence as Sloan's. But in those 20 years, the Celtics have won a championship, and the Jazz have not.