i also don't want to continue the debate but why would the exception be the rule? even tony delk and dana barros had 50+ point games.
The things RL35 cited above aren't really an "exception". Vince has a higher scoring average than Pierce in his career, averages more assists, fewer turnovers, and shoots a higher percentage overall, as well as on three-pointers. Paul averages more rebounds and steals.
Vince Carter has a ton of talent. Not just athleticism; he puts that athleticism to good use by being an elite scorer and all-around player.
What Vince doesn't have, as cited above, is a lot of heart. Talent-wise, though, I'd rank him above Pierce.