Author Topic: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....  (Read 20609 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« on: July 08, 2008, 07:38:45 AM »

Offline KungPoweChicken

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2102
  • Tommy Points: 228
If there was a way to get T. Allen and Pietrus for the full MLE, would you guys prefer that over Posey? I know I would, Tony Allen and Pietrus at the SG and SF positions would be tough as nails. We would easily the best bench wing defenders in the league. They are both young players as well. Both of these guys are athletic and can attack the glass. I invision Rondo playing 40+ a night, so essentially a second unit of Rondo, T Allen, Pietrus, Davis/Powe/ and FA big (Birdman?) would be athletic and scary. With this idea we will still need a back up PG, we will likely go into luxury tax signing a servicible big and PG. But to conclude this thought I would prefer to have two guys who can run, defend, and slash rather than one (Posey)

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2008, 07:55:23 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
I don't think DA brings back Tony Allen, esp if he gets Pietrus. Pietrus is a 3/2, that is to say his secondary position is the 2 guard spot. Posey's is the 4 spot. Tony Allen would be one step further away from the court, and his roster spot would be unwarranted.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2008, 07:57:26 AM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
If there was a way to get T. Allen and Pietrus for the full MLE, would you guys prefer that over Posey? I know I would, Tony Allen and Pietrus at the SG and SF positions would be tough as nails. We would easily the best bench wing defenders in the league. They are both young players as well. Both of these guys are athletic and can attack the glass. I invision Rondo playing 40+ a night, so essentially a second unit of Rondo, T Allen, Pietrus, Davis/Powe/ and FA big (Birdman?) would be athletic and scary. With this idea we will still need a back up PG, we will likely go into luxury tax signing a servicible big and PG. But to conclude this thought I would prefer to have two guys who can run, defend, and slash rather than one (Posey)

Let me mull that over. An unintelligent basketball player and a soft player instead of Posey? Pietrus' toughness is a myth.

No.

Next question.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2008, 08:02:30 AM by CoachBo »
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2008, 07:59:44 AM »

Offline KungPoweChicken

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2102
  • Tommy Points: 228
I don't think DA brings back Tony Allen, esp if he gets Pietrus. Pietrus is a 3/2, that is to say his secondary position is the 2 guard spot. Posey's is the 4 spot. Tony Allen would be one step further away from the court, and his roster spot would be unwarranted.


I unserstand this thinking, but without bringing back TA wouldn't that mean Giddens would be forced to play in the second unit? I really do not like the idea of rookie # 30 getting minutes? Giddens can certainly play, but he will still be a liability.

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2008, 08:03:16 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
My preference lies with signing Posey to a contract of reasonable length(3 years), and then signing a backup big and backup PG. My dream is the Celtics do Posey for a 3 year full MLE, give Kurt Thomas a 2 year LLE, and find a way to get Roger Mason as the backup point done.

Eddie House and Tony Allen would be unfortunate subtractions. If Bill Walker goes to Europe without signing a contract then I say land Eddie if possible.

Tony is history in my crystal ball.

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2008, 08:12:21 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
I don't think DA brings back Tony Allen, esp if he gets Pietrus. Pietrus is a 3/2, that is to say his secondary position is the 2 guard spot. Posey's is the 4 spot. Tony Allen would be one step further away from the court, and his roster spot would be unwarranted.


I unserstand this thinking, but without bringing back TA wouldn't that mean Giddens would be forced to play in the second unit? I really do not like the idea of rookie # 30 getting minutes? Giddens can certainly play, but he will still be a liability.

I agree.  No way is Danny going to count on a rookie.  I'd rather have Posey and Tony.  Tony will come cheap and I'm willing to bet he'd be much better next season.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2008, 08:14:04 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
I don't think DA brings back Tony Allen, esp if he gets Pietrus. Pietrus is a 3/2, that is to say his secondary position is the 2 guard spot. Posey's is the 4 spot. Tony Allen would be one step further away from the court, and his roster spot would be unwarranted.


I unserstand this thinking, but without bringing back TA wouldn't that mean Giddens would be forced to play in the second unit? I really do not like the idea of rookie # 30 getting minutes? Giddens can certainly play, but he will still be a liability.
They'll be paying him first round money. Look at a guy like Rodney Stuckey..Giddens could be like that...He's a 4 year college guy, 23, no injury history (unlike Tony) and isn't known for boneheaded defensive plays, on top of having 3 pt range. Giddens is a more versatile player than tony baloney. I have no problem with him getting 15 minutes a night.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2008, 08:23:14 AM »

Offline bucknersrevenge

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1967
  • Tommy Points: 170
I don't think DA brings back Tony Allen, esp if he gets Pietrus. Pietrus is a 3/2, that is to say his secondary position is the 2 guard spot. Posey's is the 4 spot. Tony Allen would be one step further away from the court, and his roster spot would be unwarranted.


I unserstand this thinking, but without bringing back TA wouldn't that mean Giddens would be forced to play in the second unit? I really do not like the idea of rookie # 30 getting minutes? Giddens can certainly play, but he will still be a liability.
They'll be paying him first round money. Look at a guy like Rodney Stuckey..Giddens could be like that...He's a 4 year college guy, 23, no injury history (unlike Tony) and isn't known for boneheaded defensive plays, on top of having 3 pt range. Giddens is a more versatile player than tony baloney. I have no problem with him getting 15 minutes a night.

i agree. if were talking 10-15min a night and the choice is going with giddens vs resigning tony to do that its a no-brainer to go with the kid. hes old enough, hes gonna be a good defender and even as a rookie id trust him as much as i would tony. at least when/if giddens makes a mistake on defense he has the "rookie" excuse. tony is a dumb basketball player. ill take my chances with jr if were talking 10-15mpg
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity...

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2008, 08:23:27 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
I don't think DA brings back Tony Allen, esp if he gets Pietrus. Pietrus is a 3/2, that is to say his secondary position is the 2 guard spot. Posey's is the 4 spot. Tony Allen would be one step further away from the court, and his roster spot would be unwarranted.


I unserstand this thinking, but without bringing back TA wouldn't that mean Giddens would be forced to play in the second unit? I really do not like the idea of rookie # 30 getting minutes? Giddens can certainly play, but he will still be a liability.
They'll be paying him first round money. Look at a guy like Rodney Stuckey..Giddens could be like that...He's a 4 year college guy, 23, no injury history (unlike Tony) and isn't known for boneheaded defensive plays, on top of having 3 pt range. Giddens is a more versatile player than tony baloney. I have no problem with him getting 15 minutes a night.

"Could be like that".  But I would hope that Danny would keep Tony around if he comes cheap, because I would hope that Danny wouldn't count on a rookie to produce.  I say keep Tony around for one more season.  If Giddens works out, Tony is not re-signed the following season.  But right now, I can't see Danny counting on a rookie, not when they are trying to win another ring.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2008, 08:30:51 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Tony Allen won't take part of the MLE. Pietrus, shouldn't take the full MLE. If he did take it, I would be quite skeptical to the signing.

Who do we get in addition to Pietrus with the MLE should be the important part.

There's no reason why we can't have Tony and Posey.

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2008, 09:34:46 AM »

Offline cordobes

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3556
  • Tommy Points: 576
  • Basketball is like chess, only without the dice
Pietrus is Tonny Allen on steroids. Bigger, a little better, more explosive, equally dumb, but they duplicate skills and what they offer. IMO, this wouldn't make any sense at all.

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2008, 09:45:43 AM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
First, Posey is still the better deal. 

Secondly, why would you even want Pietrus and Allen?  While Allen still might get some run in the regular season in that circumstance, come playoff time, like this year, Pietrus would take all of the backup 2/3 minutes.  Keep in mind people, that on a team with stars at the 2 and 3, we really only need one quality backup at the 2/3 unless someone gets hurt. 

I think as long as the C's get Posey or Pietrus, Giddens should be just fine in filling in the "Tony Allen" role of 10 mpg during the regular season with about 0 mpg in the playoffs. 

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2008, 09:52:19 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Keep in mind people, that on a team with stars at the 2 and 3, we really only need one quality backup at the 2/3 unless someone gets hurt.

Ah, the important exception... unless someone gets hurt. As I've said countless times, we were quite lucky that our team was healthy through most of the year and playoffs. Depth is overrated, until you suddenly need it.

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2008, 09:59:22 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
My order of desire

1) Posey for three years.
2) Maggette for the MLE
3) Pietrus

Re: Would you prefer Allen and Pietrus....
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2008, 10:09:12 AM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
Keep in mind people, that on a team with stars at the 2 and 3, we really only need one quality backup at the 2/3 unless someone gets hurt.

Ah, the important exception... unless someone gets hurt. As I've said countless times, we were quite lucky that our team was healthy through most of the year and playoffs. Depth is overrated, until you suddenly need it.

True.  But if one if Pierce, Allen, or Posey/replacement go down for any extended period of time, Tony Allen's "depth" isn't going to make a difference.