I'm going to make my judgment based upon what happened, rather than what might have happened. Doc coached as well as anybody could have coached our team in the second half of Game 4. He deserves credit for that, and to diminish that by saying that he might not have gone small otherwise is silly. Plus, one thing Doc *loves* is going small; one of the consistent complaints that is made is that he doesn't go big enough. No, this one was all Doc, and he deserves credit for it working.
And what has Phil Jackson done that was so great? Take Derek Fisher out of the game, when he was the most effective Lakers point guard? Refuse to play Trevor Ariza? Sit Lamar Odom for long periods, when he was having his best game?
This series, more than anything else, had proved to me just how overrated Phil Jackson is. He made one good move: putting Kobe on Rondo. That disrupts the Boston offense. Doc, however, countered that with Eddie, and Phil had no answer to that.
I'm sure as many of you know, I am *far* from a Doc apologist. However, when he does well, give him credit. Doc has coached very well since the end of the Cleveland series. He's made his share of mistakes this post-season (benching Powe and Eddie, his crazy four-man bench units, going small to close out victories, etc.), but he's learning from those, and is very, very close to becoming a championship coach.