Say what you will about this years Celtics but they are certainly unique. This phenomenon of "choke wins" is just bizarre. After a great win like last night there is still apprehension from blowing all but a point of a big lead and having to hold on for dear life for the win. It's a fantastic win in a clutch game situation, but you would have to blind to not see the Celtics freezing up and letting the Pistons back in the game. Once put to the ultimate test though, the Celts seem to do what it takes to win (free throws, clutch shot from Ray, defensive stops etc...).
This has held true whether within an individual game or a series as a whole. When the Celtics have lost their "pad" they have responded every time. What happens when they play from behind late in a game has not been so great, and we have yet to see what happens when they have to play from behind in a series, but that's for another discussion (one we hopefully ever have to tackle).
We've seen the "choke win" happen throughout much of the playoffs, and to a higher degree, this series. I'm a big "bottom line" kind of guy, and you can not argue with the overall results - the Celts are a game away from reaching the Finals, but you have to wonder if it is truly possible for a team to be a living, breathing oxymoron: Champs & Chokers.
So I beg the question; can we define the Celtics moments of "choking" within a game truly as "choking" if they win the game in the end? It's one of the strangest things I've ever experienced as a fan.
The Big Picture remains great and I stay focused on that. I swear they're gonna make me nuts though (or more nuts than I already am

)