Author Topic: Knicks (0-1) at Celtics (0-1) Game #2 10/23/26  (Read 2940 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Knicks (0-1) at Celtics (0-1) Game #2 10/23/26
« Reply #180 on: Yesterday at 10:34:49 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16088
  • Tommy Points: 1851
I still hate that we seem to struggle with holding leads and having rough 4ths, but it was nice to see Tatum come through in the clutch today. Best player on the floor tonight as well for both teams

We need more from PP. He?s supposed to lead the bench in scoring. Would he be better off starting?

Probably. I gotta be real, even though he can provide defense I think Walsh is mostly useless out there and should not be getting as much playing time or starting minutes as he does. I know the PP starting experiment didn't work last season, but they gotta try it again this year. Walsh offers zero threat offensively and other teams know that

This is why I thought Baylor would get the nod as the 5th starter over J Walsh / Hugo. I still think that is the way it end up if this J Walsh experiment continues to fail. This is just a detour to the same end point - Baylor as starter.

Baylors defense is not good. This is why Jordan is starting.

Yeah they are gonna need a few of these guys to figure it out. This is partially what hurt last year, a combination of guys having certain flaws, and also a question of what combinations or lineups/rotations would work with Hugo, Baylor, Walsh in particular. Frankly, I think Pritchard needs to take that leap into starter-territory. Doesn't mean he has to finish every game or play heavy minutes but they also gave him that contract for a reason, and they think he can take a leap close to Brunson based on the reports.

I?d also prefer Pritchard starting. I don?t like having two players who can?t generate offense in the starting lineup with Robinson and Walsh. Payton does a lot of things well and I feel like the other starters being elite defensively will help cover his limitations on that end.

I think they want a guy in the starting lineup who can pressure the best scorer on the other team. JB used to do that often and I don?t think they want PG, Tatum or White wearing down doing that. I still think it will end up being Baylor for stretches and Hugo for stretches and Hauser similar to last year. Hopefully one of them steps up and consistently proves they should be the 5th starter.

With no real other ball handler I think they want PP off the bench for that too. Although I think PP should be playing a lot of minutes and closing games.

Feel like Baylor and Hugo are both good ball handlers. Not at Pritchards level obviously, but not many are.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Knicks (0-1) at Celtics (0-1) Game #2 10/23/26
« Reply #181 on: Yesterday at 10:54:04 PM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 40354
  • Tommy Points: 3535
  • On To Banner 19!
I still hate that we seem to struggle with holding leads and having rough 4ths, but it was nice to see Tatum come through in the clutch today. Best player on the floor tonight as well for both teams

We need more from PP. He?s supposed to lead the bench in scoring. Would he be better off starting?

Probably. I gotta be real, even though he can provide defense I think Walsh is mostly useless out there and should not be getting as much playing time or starting minutes as he does. I know the PP starting experiment didn't work last season, but they gotta try it again this year. Walsh offers zero threat offensively and other teams know that

This is why I thought Baylor would get the nod as the 5th starter over J Walsh / Hugo. I still think that is the way it end up if this J Walsh experiment continues to fail. This is just a detour to the same end point - Baylor as starter.

Baylors defense is not good. This is why Jordan is starting.

Yeah they are gonna need a few of these guys to figure it out. This is partially what hurt last year, a combination of guys having certain flaws, and also a question of what combinations or lineups/rotations would work with Hugo, Baylor, Walsh in particular. Frankly, I think Pritchard needs to take that leap into starter-territory. Doesn't mean he has to finish every game or play heavy minutes but they also gave him that contract for a reason, and they think he can take a leap close to Brunson based on the reports.

I?d also prefer Pritchard starting. I don?t like having two players who can?t generate offense in the starting lineup with Robinson and Walsh. Payton does a lot of things well and I feel like the other starters being elite defensively will help cover his limitations on that end.

I think they want a guy in the starting lineup who can pressure the best scorer on the other team. JB used to do that often and I don?t think they want PG, Tatum or White wearing down doing that. I still think it will end up being Baylor for stretches and Hugo for stretches and Hauser similar to last year. Hopefully one of them steps up and consistently proves they should be the 5th starter.

With no real other ball handler I think they want PP off the bench for that too. Although I think PP should be playing a lot of minutes and closing games.

An issue they ran into last season in the playoffs, especially going into Game 7 was what combination could work in the lineup. Yes Tatum was out, but Joe decided to start Garza, Harper and Baylor along with JB/White. Was it a terrible idea? Yeah. But was there any consistent options he could go to from the youth (Walsh, Hugo, Baylor)? Even Queta was struggling and typically got in foul trouble early.

Yeah, it'd be nice if someone emerged from the group as a consistent starter. I feel like Baylor should be that guy if he can improve the defense, but Hugo could be in the running probably next year. Idk if he can make that huge leap this year but Hugo gives me Josh Hart-vibes if he can score a bit more and polishes his game.
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: Knicks (0-1) at Celtics (0-1) Game #2 10/23/26
« Reply #182 on: Yesterday at 10:58:21 PM »

Online LilRip

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7062
  • Tommy Points: 416
Terrific game from so many players! Tatum, obviously, player of the game. But I thought all the bigs did real well (M-Rob, Queta, Garza), as did PG and Walsh and White. Only Pritchard didn?t have a good game. He looked overwhelmed at times from the physical and pesky defense.
- LilRip

Re: Knicks (0-1) at Celtics (0-1) Game #2 10/23/26
« Reply #183 on: Yesterday at 10:58:54 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 55889
  • Tommy Points: 2631
Yeah, it'd be nice if someone emerged from the group as a consistent starter. I feel like Baylor should be that guy if he can improve the defense, but Hugo could be in the running probably next year. Idk if he can make that huge leap this year but Hugo gives me Josh Hart-vibes if he can score a bit more and polishes his game.

It is a bit disappointing how little Hugo has played these first 2 games. Only 4 minutes tonight. Only 10 minutes in game 1.

Hugo must not have shown the coaching staff much in training camp. He was so good at the little things last year that you felt any type of jump in his shot-making / outside shooting would make him a consistent 20-25mpg guy this year. He must not have shown that in camp.

It is only the start of the season but it is a bad start for Hugo.

Re: Knicks (0-1) at Celtics (0-1) Game #2 10/23/26
« Reply #184 on: Yesterday at 11:43:16 PM »

Offline radiohead

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8534
  • Tommy Points: 1457
Yeah, it'd be nice if someone emerged from the group as a consistent starter. I feel like Baylor should be that guy if he can improve the defense, but Hugo could be in the running probably next year. Idk if he can make that huge leap this year but Hugo gives me Josh Hart-vibes if he can score a bit more and polishes his game.

It is a bit disappointing how little Hugo has played these first 2 games. Only 4 minutes tonight. Only 10 minutes in game 1.

Hugo must not have shown the coaching staff much in training camp. He was so good at the little things last year that you felt any type of jump in his shot-making / outside shooting would make him a consistent 20-25mpg guy this year. He must not have shown that in camp.

It is only the start of the season but it is a bad start for Hugo.

Hugo/Baylor/Walsh will likely get their moments. They?ll be like Robinson/Queta/Garza.

Re: Knicks (0-1) at Celtics (0-1) Game #2 10/23/26
« Reply #185 on: Today at 12:26:55 AM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52608
  • Tommy Points: 3231
Curious to see how we handle the upcoming B2B, especially against two bottom feeders.
Recovering Joe Skeptic, but inching towards a relapse.

EDIT: Nevermind - back on the Fire Joe Train!

Re: Knicks (0-1) at Celtics (0-1) Game #2 10/23/26
« Reply #186 on: Today at 01:01:46 AM »

Online tenn_smoothie

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7426
  • Tommy Points: 865
Brunson is a clutch player. Tatum needs to be that guy too especially with Jaylen gone now

JT with some big buckets late, love to see that

Yes, he hit the big shots at the end of a great rebound game for him.

My problem with those shots was that Mazzula is still just having Tatum go iso to get a very difficult, contested shot up that was probably going to determine the game for us.
We certainly had plenty of time to run a play and get some ball movement for an easier shot.
The Celtic Generals:
Russell - Cowens - Bird - Garnett - Tatum

The Celtic Lieutenants:
Cousy - Havlicek - McHale - Pierce - Brown