Big win for MIA with Giannis and Adebayo both scoring 37 pts (74 pts combined). The conventional wisdom, including my own, has been that these two are a bad fit. I have thought that they will figure it out to some extent and play better than it has looked to start. I was curious so did some stat diving:
Last Season
Giannis without Adebayo -11 -66
Adebayo without Giannis +10 -90
Giannis with Adebayo +13 +2
Last game, they did well with them both on the floor and on the season, I was surprised by how well they do together relative to how they do when it is only one one of them on the floor. This data does not support the "they are not a good fit together" theory. I am not sure how to explain it. Portis seems like the main 3rd big:
Season
Portis + Adebayo +14
Portis + Giannis +3
Giannis wo Adebayo or Portis -69
Adebayo wo Giannis or Portis -102
Portis wo Giannis or Adebayo +55
The second set of data shows that Adebayo and Giannis are fine with Portis, but not so much when it is just Giannis or just Adebayo. They are also fine when Portis is playing without Giannis or Adebayo.
Meh just some meh Cavs team. Guess we can tip our hats to them for one good game
See I think Portis would have been a good addition off the bench had Brad pulled that trigger over the summer. Provides that extra spark. Just don't know what's special about Hugo and Baylor; they both been garbage.
Maybe you are getting a little carried away...
Ok, granted Hugo has not lived up to the hype we heard over the summer, although he is still only 20 years old.
However, I think Baylor is having a pretty decent year and getting better, especially with his extra minutes and finishing games...20min, 6.1pts,4.0reb,1.4asts,.8stls and shooting 47.2% from 3 and 100% FT%, not all-star but not garbage. Also, his shooting efficiency is better than PG,DWhite,PP, and JT...not too shabby.