I?m going to say something that might make it seem like I don?t appreciate JB, because I do, and extremely thankful for his 10 years in Boston and being a part of the 2024 championship team.
Brown was just the best player on a 56 win team with a 35.1 usage rate, the 3rd highest in the NBA, though not a championship caliber team. He has called it his favorite year on more than more occasion, and he loved having the ball in his hands more.
Jayson Tatum is 76-9 (!!) when he has a usage rate of 33% and above in the last 4 seasons, that?s an .89% WIN RATE. I copied that stat from another thread here, can?t remember where.
The Celtics I believe, and rightfully so in my opinion, want to lean into Tatum being the unquestioned number 1 player with being among the top usage rate players in the league. He is just the better all around player.
How does that work with Brown, will he willingly go back to a little lower usage rate with Tatum back in the fold? I?m not so sure if he thinks he is on the same level as Tatum.
I haven?t done a historical review, but it seems very unrealistic to have 2 players pushing mid 30s for a usage rate. I did look at this year?s usage leaders and tried to find 2 players on the same team that had a usage rate of 30 or higher. I see Doncic as the league leader with 36.8, and thought James would be higher but was only at 26.2. Embiid was at 33.6 but in only 38 games played while Maxey was at 28.6. Mitchell was at 31.1 while Harden was at 27.9 though part of the season he was with the Clippers (Garland had 26.6) Jokic was at 28.9 while Murray was at 26.7. Booker was at 30.7 with 64 games played and Green at 30.9 but with only 32 games played, are the only 2 hovering around 30 as teammates but both missed a lot of games combined. I couldn?t find any other 2 teammates that were in this ballpark.
I looked at the previous 4 years for Brown and he was in the 28-30 usage rate range. If the Celtics want to bump Tatum?s usage up and Brown back down would Brown have been fine with that? I haven?t done my doubts.