Author Topic: 2026-27 Celtics Off Season Discussion  (Read 3260 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 2026-27 Celtics Off Season Discussion
« Reply #15 on: Yesterday at 08:50:59 AM »

Offline timpiker

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1751
  • Tommy Points: 117
I thought the team we had this year was just fine, proving I don't know much.

Re: 2026-27 Celtics Off Season Discussion
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 08:54:22 AM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 64469
  • Tommy Points: -25366
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I thought the team we had this year was just fine, proving I don't know much.

Yeah, I was actually excited for the playoffs.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: 2026-27 Celtics Off Season Discussion
« Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 09:23:31 AM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 54287
  • Tommy Points: 2603
If we don't trade a core piece, I'd be happy signing Sexton and Taurean Prince, and trading our first for Yves Messi.

You are OK with a big rotation of Queta, Messi, and Garza (plus maybe Williams if he develops)?

Not really, but who else is there?

I'd like Vuc back, but Joe misuses him.  I can't imagine he'd want to return.

I have no good answer other than Giannis. I am not that familiar with Messi. Is better than Vucevic?

It is Missi with an "i". Yves Missi. Lionel Messi must have overtaken sports news in recent months ;)

Missi is a fairly raw athletic big man. He plays with energy but limited know-how. Shows a little potential beyond being a garbage man on offense with the occassional drive from the top of the key and some average passing from there as well.

He doesn't have much impact on defense because he doesn't know what he is doing. He hasn't figured it out yet. He took a step backwards last season which was disappointing. I thought he would beat out D Queen because Missi was more limited but less mistake prone. That wasn't the case. Seemed to sulk over his lack of opportunities as well.

Missi has decent size. Around 6-10/6-11. Decent strength but still below average. Above average speed & overall mobility. So he has good physical tools. Good tools for being a quality NBA defender. He should become a quality NBA defender. The only way he doesn't is if he doesn't work hard enough which is why his performance last year was a concern. Did not work as hard he should. Did not improve his defense. Then sorta gave up after he lost playing time to the rookie D Queen.

He would be a decent backup big man for us. Probably in the top end of the middle of the pack bench centers. He wouldn't be a stopper on the likes of Embiid or Towns. He doesn't have the basics defensively yet or bulk physically to combat them.

He would be an upgrade on Garza.
He would be a downgrade on Vucevic.

He would probably be a lateral move on the Vucevic we saw in the playoffs who Mazzula did not involve in the offense. If Vooch was involved, he'd be a major upgrade over Missi. If not involved, Missi is more different (athletic rim runner vs skilled 7 footer) than better or worse than Vooch.

----------------

Sorry, I should add. There is upside there with Missi. Similar to Queta. He learns the basics defensively and he could become a starter quality center within 1-2 years.

Hard work and mastery on defensive fundamentals. He is a willing defender. He is not a guy you have cajole into playing D. He will play D. He just doesn't know what he is doing. So the results are less than the effort expanded. It will be how coachable he is and how hard he is willing to work.

Re: 2026-27 Celtics Off Season Discussion
« Reply #18 on: Today at 10:43:22 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14918
  • Tommy Points: 1101
Thanks Who for the breakdown on Missi, I didn't even know how to spell his name.

What do people think about John Collins.  The last 3 seasons he has been pretty consistent, 15 or so points, 7 or so Rebs, 39-ish% from 3.  He will be 29 for the start of the season.  Any sense for what kind of money he will get?  I have hardly seen him play over the last few seasons.  What is his problem?  Of the rotation players on LAC, he had the worst NRtg (-1.2).  I know he isn't a center but he is a legit PF (also a need).  Any chance of a reclamation with him?

Re: 2026-27 Celtics Off Season Discussion
« Reply #19 on: Today at 01:19:15 PM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14918
  • Tommy Points: 1101
Another interesting target to me is Lauri Markkanen.  I worked in Helsinki for a year so I have some bias toward Finns.  It seems to me that Kessler is their Center and Jaren Jackson is there PF.  If Markkanen is used as a SF, that to me seems grossly out of position.  He is a PF at worst and maybe more of a C.  He certainly could play C for BOS.  There are durability concerns with Markkanen, but last season may be more about UTA shutting everyone down so they would not lose their pick to OKC.  In the 42 games he did play, 27 and 7 with about 35% 3P%. 

Any trade would have to start with Brown.  A straight up trade does work in terms of money even though Brown makes $11M more.  But UTA would have to add picks or other pieces to make the value work.  Brown seems like a perfect fit for UTA.  A Brown Jackson 1-2 punch is pretty solid, then add all the up and coming young players.

Re: 2026-27 Celtics Off Season Discussion
« Reply #20 on: Today at 01:58:20 PM »

Online jambr380

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14017
  • Tommy Points: 2098
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Another interesting target to me is Lauri Markkanen.  I worked in Helsinki for a year so I have some bias toward Finns.  It seems to me that Kessler is their Center and Jaren Jackson is there PF.  If Markkanen is used as a SF, that to me seems grossly out of position.  He is a PF at worst and maybe more of a C.  He certainly could play C for BOS.  There are durability concerns with Markkanen, but last season may be more about UTA shutting everyone down so they would not lose their pick to OKC.  In the 42 games he did play, 27 and 7 with about 35% 3P%. 

Any trade would have to start with Brown.  A straight up trade does work in terms of money even though Brown makes $11M more.  But UTA would have to add picks or other pieces to make the value work.  Brown seems like a perfect fit for UTA.  A Brown Jackson 1-2 punch is pretty solid, then add all the up and coming young players.

I had suggested Lauri and top 4 pick or Lauri and Ace. The fact that they landed #2 might have put the first option out of reach and I'm not sure where to gauge Ace's potential at this point.

Not saying I definitely would do it, but I can see the allure for Utah. That team would be primed to compete with Jaylen coming in, JJJ healthy, and some solid younger depth. Jaylen is also a Danny guy, so I'm sure they'd love to have him.