Author Topic: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?  (Read 1260 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?
« Reply #15 on: Yesterday at 11:01:06 AM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14344
  • Tommy Points: 1776
Perhaps... 🤔


Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 11:24:49 AM »

Offline A Future of Stevens

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2871
  • Tommy Points: 531
I'm in on Harper.  He looked like he belonged on an NBA roster.  His defense was what I was worried about but if he guards SF I think he be ok.  I think the C's have to wait the full 14 days to sign someone to stay under the Luxury tax.  Pending who they can sign it may have to be Shulga because the hit for a rookie minimum is much lower then a vet minimum.  At this point it's 100% necessary to stay under the luxury tax.
I also liked Harper's minutes. I feel like his size makes him versatile. He could fill in minutes when needed at the 1 2 or 3.
#JKJB

Re: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?
« Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 12:14:44 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37982
  • Tommy Points: 3046
Id love Lonzo

That?s who I predicted several days ago, he d be free .  Good fit . Passer and active defender

Re: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?
« Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 01:46:58 PM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6921
  • Tommy Points: 821
Id love Lonzo

Yeah. I thought he'd sign with the Hornets already to team up with his brother. But that he hasn't may mean some other teams are looking at him.

He reminds me a bit of Evan Turner at this point in his career. He's a connector player. The ball will move when he is in the game, and I think he can play good defense. He can't be counted on to create his own shot, but we don't need that.

Not sure he wants to be "end of the bench" player though.

Re: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?
« Reply #19 on: Yesterday at 03:06:15 PM »

Online Celtics2021

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8257
  • Tommy Points: 1060
It has to be Shulga.  Harper Jr. is too expensive, unless they just mean they will keep Harper Jr. on the Boston roster as a two-way player, since they have enough games to keep him up.  But they will not sign anyone from outside the organization, nor anyone who played in the NBA before this year.

Re: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?
« Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 03:43:44 PM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6921
  • Tommy Points: 821
It has to be Shulga.  Harper Jr. is too expensive, unless they just mean they will keep Harper Jr. on the Boston roster as a two-way player, since they have enough games to keep him up.  But they will not sign anyone from outside the organization, nor anyone who played in the NBA before this year.

Hayden Gray has been a much better ball-handler for the Maine Celtics this year. I know they drafted Shulga, but Gray is the best player on that team when Amari and Harper aren't playing.

Re: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?
« Reply #21 on: Yesterday at 11:27:29 PM »

Offline radiohead

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8084
  • Tommy Points: 1425
Cole Anthony is also available i believe.

Re: Who's the ball handler Brad is speaking of?
« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 11:40:20 PM »

Online Celtics2021

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8257
  • Tommy Points: 1060
It has to be Shulga.  Harper Jr. is too expensive, unless they just mean they will keep Harper Jr. on the Boston roster as a two-way player, since they have enough games to keep him up.  But they will not sign anyone from outside the organization, nor anyone who played in the NBA before this year.

Hayden Gray has been a much better ball-handler for the Maine Celtics this year. I know they drafted Shulga, but Gray is the best player on that team when Amari and Harper aren't playing.

I don?t know if you still hold that opinion after seeing Shulga in person tonight.  But regardless, there is a rather arcane luxury tax rule that says that rookie minimum-salaried players count the same as two-year vet minimum players for luxury tax purposes (so teams in the tax don?t go signing G-leaguers at the expense of vets to reduce their tax bill).  What has not been clear to me is if this tax treatment counts for determining whether a team is over the tax, or only kicks in once a team is over the tax.  In other words, would Gray and Shulga count the same as long as Boston is under, but if they go over then Gray counts more?  Or does Gray always count more and the Celtics would thus go into the tax if they signed him?  I think it?s the latter, but we will find out soon enough.

I suppose the other ball-handler option would be bringing over Yam Madar.  Not what I expect to happen, but technically possible.