Author Topic: Shams: Minott to BKN  (Read 880 times)

libermaniac and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Shams: Minott to BKN
« Reply #15 on: Today at 02:31:02 PM »

Online President Red

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 163
  • Tommy Points: 57
I didn't expect this one, particularly because he had gotten at least token playing time after what supposedly was a long absence due to an ankle injury.  I thought he would get some ninth-man time, at least.  I hope there's a plan for the open roster spots beyond a cost savings.


I think he just got passed by three Celtics draft picks and there was not longer a great need for a very small ball C.

That makes sense.  I was pleasantly surprised by him early in the year.  I had expected him to be a garbage-time guy at best and he impressed me.  Of course, I also expected Boucher to be a pretty big contributor, so that's how far my player evaluations can be trusted.


Re: Shams: Minott to BKN
« Reply #16 on: Today at 02:36:17 PM »

Online Celtic Fan Forever

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6185
  • Tommy Points: 2462
Anyone know what we get back? Protected second, cash?
2025 CelticsStrong Historical Draft Orlando Magic:
PG: Chris Paul, Fred VanVleet
SG: Ray Allen, OG Anunoby, Zach Lavine
SF: Paul Pierce, Gordon Hayward
PF: Chris Bosh, Serge Ibaka, David West
C: Tim Duncan, Andrew Bogut

Re: Shams: Minott to BKN
« Reply #17 on: Today at 02:41:48 PM »

Online Jiri Welsch

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3173
  • Tommy Points: 376
Anyone know what we get back? Protected second, cash?

Maybe cash -- but I saw no player and no draft pick.

Re: Shams: Minott to BKN
« Reply #18 on: Today at 03:05:50 PM »

Offline flybono

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1030
  • Tommy Points: 50
BS took out the trash
Good riddance

Re: Shams: Minott to BKN
« Reply #19 on: Today at 03:21:19 PM »

Online ozgod

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19178
  • Tommy Points: 1575
I figured this was a move to get us under the tax. Right now we are $1.7m over the tax line, so we will be paying $5m in tax. A trifling amount but it's the rate that they would have wanted to reset, given how close they got to resetting it. Right now we have no more non-guaranteed contracts we can waive to get under it. We could probably waive and stretch someone like X, that would spread out his $2.5m into 5 years at $500k a season so that would *technically* get us below the tax, but I can't see Brad doing that given how popular X apparently is in the locker room. Popular enough to not be able to reset the tax for, given we are SO CLOSE?

(click to enlarge)


Looks like we converted Amari to a standard contract.
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D


Re: Shams: Minott to BKN
« Reply #20 on: Today at 03:30:42 PM »

Online ozgod

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19178
  • Tommy Points: 1575
Forget what I said...according to @Celtics2021 you can't stretch players waived during the season, and in any case you can only stretch them over 3 years, not 5.
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D