Author Topic: Quentin Grimes  (Read 840 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Quentin Grimes
« on: Yesterday at 06:28:10 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13939
  • Tommy Points: 1719
The Celtics should go after him. Philly has too many guards with Maxey, VJ, and McCain who is back tonight. Quentin signed a 1 year deal with the 76ers for $8M and is averaging 18pts, 5rebs, 5ast with 45/45/77 shooting splits. He?s 6?4? 210lbs, so decent size for a SG.

Starters: White, Grimes, Brown, Tatum, Queta.
Bench: Pritchard, Hauser, Minott, Hugo, FA Center

I think that could be a contending team.

« Last Edit: Yesterday at 06:41:02 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 08:49:17 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15280
  • Tommy Points: 1038
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
I like Grimes, but would rather go after a front-court player who can suck down rebounds. That seems to be the greatest need even after Tatum is back.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 09:18:55 PM »

Online ozgod

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18949
  • Tommy Points: 1537
He can?t be traded till January and he can veto any trade. He would be a rental as he?s looking for 20-25 million a season which I doubt Brad will give him. That?s why he took so long to accept his qualifying offer in Philly, he was expecting a big payday, but nobody was willing to stump up the money.

My friend is a Sixers fan so I followed this guy?s restricted free agency pretty closely
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D


Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #3 on: Today at 11:55:26 AM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13939
  • Tommy Points: 1719
He can?t be traded till January and he can veto any trade. He would be a rental as he?s looking for 20-25 million a season which I doubt Brad will give him. That?s why he took so long to accept his qualifying offer in Philly, he was expecting a big payday, but nobody was willing to stump up the money.

My friend is a Sixers fan so I followed this guy?s restricted free agency pretty closely

I mean, $20M/year for a guy who is averaging 18/5/5 with excellent shooting seems pretty fair to me. The Celtics aren?t contending with what they have. They lost too much talent.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #4 on: Today at 12:04:49 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32575
  • Tommy Points: 10120
I like Grimes, but would rather go after a front-court player who can suck down rebounds. That seems to be the greatest need even after Tatum is back.
exactly.  frontcourt needs fixing more than the back court.  we're already loaded in the backcourt and have our own version of Grimes we'll be unloading at the deadline in Simons.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #5 on: Today at 12:06:29 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32575
  • Tommy Points: 10120
He can?t be traded till January and he can veto any trade. He would be a rental as he?s looking for 20-25 million a season which I doubt Brad will give him. That?s why he took so long to accept his qualifying offer in Philly, he was expecting a big payday, but nobody was willing to stump up the money.

My friend is a Sixers fan so I followed this guy?s restricted free agency pretty closely

I mean, $20M/year for a guy who is averaging 18/5/5 with excellent shooting seems pretty fair to me. The Celtics aren?t contending with what they have. They lost too much talent.
they won't be contending by replacing Simons with Grimes either.  Need big men that can provide some offense, rebounding and solid defense.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #6 on: Today at 02:10:30 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13939
  • Tommy Points: 1719
I like Grimes, but would rather go after a front-court player who can suck down rebounds. That seems to be the greatest need even after Tatum is back.
exactly.  frontcourt needs fixing more than the back court.  we're already loaded in the backcourt and have our own version of Grimes we'll be unloading at the deadline in Simons.

Except Grimes can actually play defense. Feel like that?s a pretty important piece you are leaving out. If Simons was actually good defensively, maybe Brad would want to keep him.  :)
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #7 on: Today at 03:21:19 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32575
  • Tommy Points: 10120
I like Grimes, but would rather go after a front-court player who can suck down rebounds. That seems to be the greatest need even after Tatum is back.
exactly.  frontcourt needs fixing more than the back court.  we're already loaded in the backcourt and have our own version of Grimes we'll be unloading at the deadline in Simons.

Except Grimes can actually play defense. Feel like that?s a pretty important piece you are leaving out. If Simons was actually good defensively, maybe Brad would want to keep him.  :)
and if we need a defender in the backcourt we use White, Brown, Hugo.  frontcourt is a far greater need or have you not seen how badly we're getting killed on the boards this year?

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #8 on: Today at 08:35:04 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13939
  • Tommy Points: 1719
I like Grimes, but would rather go after a front-court player who can suck down rebounds. That seems to be the greatest need even after Tatum is back.
exactly.  frontcourt needs fixing more than the back court.  we're already loaded in the backcourt and have our own version of Grimes we'll be unloading at the deadline in Simons.

Except Grimes can actually play defense. Feel like that?s a pretty important piece you are leaving out. If Simons was actually good defensively, maybe Brad would want to keep him.  :)
and if we need a defender in the backcourt we use White, Brown, Hugo.  frontcourt is a far greater need or have you not seen how badly we're getting killed on the boards this year?

Seems like Boston not having their starting PF (Tatum) who averages 9 rebounds a game is a big reason why the C?s are getting killed on the boards. Also, Hugo isn?t a rotation player on a playoff team. He plays hard, but is very raw.

Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #9 on: Today at 08:44:28 PM »

Online ozgod

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18949
  • Tommy Points: 1537
He can?t be traded till January and he can veto any trade. He would be a rental as he?s looking for 20-25 million a season which I doubt Brad will give him. That?s why he took so long to accept his qualifying offer in Philly, he was expecting a big payday, but nobody was willing to stump up the money.

My friend is a Sixers fan so I followed this guy?s restricted free agency pretty closely

I mean, $20M/year for a guy who is averaging 18/5/5 with excellent shooting seems pretty fair to me. The Celtics aren?t contending with what they have. They lost too much talent.

Unfortunately for Quentin, you didn't work for any of the NBA front offices, because nobody took him up on his ask of $20-$25m a season (and that was down from $30m):-\

On the flip side: Grimes took his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer in Philadelphia because the Sixers did not think he was worth close to the $25 million annual salary range that the Grimes camp was seeking.

Quote
The sides were so far apart, sources say, that Philadelphia saw little need all summer to make an offer of any kind to Grimes until the week before training camps opened.

https://marcstein.substack.com/p/restricted-free-agency-is-over-at

He's a good example of how the cost of filling up your cap space with a high-priced role player and possibly going over the aprons, along with their associated penalties, make deals like this a lot harder to sign these days:

Quote
The Sixers' justification for their lack of interest in such a contractual framework: the team insists its intent is not merely to sign Grimes to facilitate an eventual trade. They do not see a reason to pay him significantly more money than he would get on the qualifying offer for the sake of having an easier time dealing him. Right now, the Sixers seem willing to add a very small amount of money to the $8.7 million if Grimes waives his no-trade clause; Bauman confirmed he is looking for a much more substantial bump.

If Grimes is ultimately traded during the season, his upcoming salary is of the utmost importance to Bauman. A team that trades for Grimes would not inherit the Full Bird rights currently possessed by the Sixers. They would be able to offer Grimes a deal for 2026-27 starting at up to 120 percent of his salary in the 2025-26 season. Grimes' chances of cashing in with a team that trades for him will be substantially higher if the Sixers provide him with an inflated salary. Even if Grimes approved a trade on the qualifying offer, the team inheriting non-Bird rights on him would have no ability to pay Grimes at the price point he continues to covet unless it has cap space.

https://www.phillyvoice.com/quentin-grimes-agent-david-bauman-news-breaking-exclusive-restricted-free-agency-daryl-morey-qualifying-offer-rules/

So if we were to sign him and not have his full Bird rights, there's a limit to how much we can offer him in going over the cap, which we are, while other teams can sign him outright for whatever he is asking for in full free agency...but obviously it depends on his market, which other free agents are out there, and other teams' cap situation. That would be something to consider which is why I doubt Brad would go for it.

Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D


Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #10 on: Today at 09:26:54 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13939
  • Tommy Points: 1719
He can?t be traded till January and he can veto any trade. He would be a rental as he?s looking for 20-25 million a season which I doubt Brad will give him. That?s why he took so long to accept his qualifying offer in Philly, he was expecting a big payday, but nobody was willing to stump up the money.

My friend is a Sixers fan so I followed this guy?s restricted free agency pretty closely

I mean, $20M/year for a guy who is averaging 18/5/5 with excellent shooting seems pretty fair to me. The Celtics aren?t contending with what they have. They lost too much talent.

Unfortunately for Quentin, you didn't work for any of the NBA front offices, because nobody took him up on his ask of $20-$25m a season (and that was down from $30m):-\

On the flip side: Grimes took his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer in Philadelphia because the Sixers did not think he was worth close to the $25 million annual salary range that the Grimes camp was seeking.
[/b]

Quote
The sides were so far apart, sources say, that Philadelphia saw little need all summer to make an offer of any kind to Grimes until the week before training camps opened.

https://marcstein.substack.com/p/restricted-free-agency-is-over-at

He's a good example of how the cost of filling up your cap space with a high-priced role player and possibly going over the aprons, along with their associated penalties, make deals like this a lot harder to sign these days:

Quote
The Sixers' justification for their lack of interest in such a contractual framework: the team insists its intent is not merely to sign Grimes to facilitate an eventual trade. They do not see a reason to pay him significantly more money than he would get on the qualifying offer for the sake of having an easier time dealing him. Right now, the Sixers seem willing to add a very small amount of money to the $8.7 million if Grimes waives his no-trade clause; Bauman confirmed he is looking for a much more substantial bump.

If Grimes is ultimately traded during the season, his upcoming salary is of the utmost importance to Bauman. A team that trades for Grimes would not inherit the Full Bird rights currently possessed by the Sixers. They would be able to offer Grimes a deal for 2026-27 starting at up to 120 percent of his salary in the 2025-26 season. Grimes' chances of cashing in with a team that trades for him will be substantially higher if the Sixers provide him with an inflated salary. Even if Grimes approved a trade on the qualifying offer, the team inheriting non-Bird rights on him would have no ability to pay Grimes at the price point he continues to covet unless it has cap space.

https://www.phillyvoice.com/quentin-grimes-agent-david-bauman-news-breaking-exclusive-restricted-free-agency-daryl-morey-qualifying-offer-rules/

So if we were to sign him and not have his full Bird rights, there's a limit to how much we can offer him in going over the cap, which we are, while other teams can sign him outright for whatever he is asking for in full free agency...but obviously it depends on his market, which other free agents are out there, and other teams' cap situation. That would be something to consider which is why I doubt Brad would go for it.

Teams didn?t have the Cap space. That doesn?t mean he?s not worth $20M/year.

Dillon Brooks is $22M/year, Caldwell-Pope is $21.6M/year, Cam Johnson is $21M/year, Norman Powell is $20M/year, Josh Hart is just under $20M this year and will be over $21M next. Grimes is as good as those players.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #11 on: Today at 10:03:52 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32575
  • Tommy Points: 10120
I like Grimes, but would rather go after a front-court player who can suck down rebounds. That seems to be the greatest need even after Tatum is back.
exactly.  frontcourt needs fixing more than the back court.  we're already loaded in the backcourt and have our own version of Grimes we'll be unloading at the deadline in Simons.

Except Grimes can actually play defense. Feel like that?s a pretty important piece you are leaving out. If Simons was actually good defensively, maybe Brad would want to keep him.  :)
and if we need a defender in the backcourt we use White, Brown, Hugo.  frontcourt is a far greater need or have you not seen how badly we're getting killed on the boards this year?

Seems like Boston not having their starting PF (Tatum) who averages 9 rebounds a game is a big reason why the C?s are getting killed on the boards. Also, Hugo isn?t a rotation player on a playoff team. He plays hard, but is very raw.
Tatum doesn't solve the problem.  he helps alleviate the situation but we're still missing out on the rebounds from KP, Al and Kornet. 

Hugo's raw but he can defend.  and if you haven't noticed by now, we're not a playoff team.  get him some playing time while we're not and when we are next season, he'll be better prepared to help the team.

no need for Grimes.  need a big man

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #12 on: Today at 10:25:16 PM »

Online Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13939
  • Tommy Points: 1719
I like Grimes, but would rather go after a front-court player who can suck down rebounds. That seems to be the greatest need even after Tatum is back.
exactly.  frontcourt needs fixing more than the back court.  we're already loaded in the backcourt and have our own version of Grimes we'll be unloading at the deadline in Simons.

Except Grimes can actually play defense. Feel like that?s a pretty important piece you are leaving out. If Simons was actually good defensively, maybe Brad would want to keep him.  :)
and if we need a defender in the backcourt we use White, Brown, Hugo.  frontcourt is a far greater need or have you not seen how badly we're getting killed on the boards this year?

Seems like Boston not having their starting PF (Tatum) who averages 9 rebounds a game is a big reason why the C?s are getting killed on the boards. Also, Hugo isn?t a rotation player on a playoff team. He plays hard, but is very raw.
Tatum doesn't solve the problem.  he helps alleviate the situation but we're still missing out on the rebounds from KP, Al and Kornet. 

Hugo's raw but he can defend.  and if you haven't noticed by now, we're not a playoff team.  get him some playing time while we're not and when we are next season, he'll be better prepared to help the team.

no need for Grimes.  need a big man

Tatum was the best rebounder on the team the year they won the Championship. He averaged 10rpg in the playoffs. Also, you do realize that KP barely played in the postseason, right? Kornet averaged 3rebs a game. Tatum and Queta will get plenty of rebounds. The problem is having Hauser and or Pritchard as starters. Grimes would push them both to the bench. He?d be a solid addition and would help fill the void left by Jrue.
« Last Edit: Today at 10:46:55 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Quentin Grimes
« Reply #13 on: Today at 10:38:29 PM »

Online ozgod

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18949
  • Tommy Points: 1537
He can?t be traded till January and he can veto any trade. He would be a rental as he?s looking for 20-25 million a season which I doubt Brad will give him. That?s why he took so long to accept his qualifying offer in Philly, he was expecting a big payday, but nobody was willing to stump up the money.

My friend is a Sixers fan so I followed this guy?s restricted free agency pretty closely

I mean, $20M/year for a guy who is averaging 18/5/5 with excellent shooting seems pretty fair to me. The Celtics aren?t contending with what they have. They lost too much talent.

Unfortunately for Quentin, you didn't work for any of the NBA front offices, because nobody took him up on his ask of $20-$25m a season (and that was down from $30m):-\

On the flip side: Grimes took his one-year, $8.7 million qualifying offer in Philadelphia because the Sixers did not think he was worth close to the $25 million annual salary range that the Grimes camp was seeking.
[/b]

Quote
The sides were so far apart, sources say, that Philadelphia saw little need all summer to make an offer of any kind to Grimes until the week before training camps opened.

https://marcstein.substack.com/p/restricted-free-agency-is-over-at

He's a good example of how the cost of filling up your cap space with a high-priced role player and possibly going over the aprons, along with their associated penalties, make deals like this a lot harder to sign these days:

Quote
The Sixers' justification for their lack of interest in such a contractual framework: the team insists its intent is not merely to sign Grimes to facilitate an eventual trade. They do not see a reason to pay him significantly more money than he would get on the qualifying offer for the sake of having an easier time dealing him. Right now, the Sixers seem willing to add a very small amount of money to the $8.7 million if Grimes waives his no-trade clause; Bauman confirmed he is looking for a much more substantial bump.

If Grimes is ultimately traded during the season, his upcoming salary is of the utmost importance to Bauman. A team that trades for Grimes would not inherit the Full Bird rights currently possessed by the Sixers. They would be able to offer Grimes a deal for 2026-27 starting at up to 120 percent of his salary in the 2025-26 season. Grimes' chances of cashing in with a team that trades for him will be substantially higher if the Sixers provide him with an inflated salary. Even if Grimes approved a trade on the qualifying offer, the team inheriting non-Bird rights on him would have no ability to pay Grimes at the price point he continues to covet unless it has cap space.

https://www.phillyvoice.com/quentin-grimes-agent-david-bauman-news-breaking-exclusive-restricted-free-agency-daryl-morey-qualifying-offer-rules/

So if we were to sign him and not have his full Bird rights, there's a limit to how much we can offer him in going over the cap, which we are, while other teams can sign him outright for whatever he is asking for in full free agency...but obviously it depends on his market, which other free agents are out there, and other teams' cap situation. That would be something to consider which is why I doubt Brad would go for it.

Teams didn?t have the Cap space. That doesn?t mean he?s not worth $20M/year.

Dillon Brooks is $22M/year, Caldwell-Pope is $21.6M/year, Cam Johnson is $21M/year, Norman Powell is $20M/year, Josh Hart is just under $20M this year and will be over $21M next. Grimes is as good as those players.

The way I see it, he is worth as much as what someone's willing to pay him, and cap considerations do play into that because he got no takers. We'll see how many takers he has at $20m-$25m next season when he's a free agent. Even if we trade for him now though, our ability to extend him at a higher number is limited to 120% of $8.7m, because we would only have limited Bird rights. That's why they wanted a big number for his this offseason.

There's a decent FA class next year too, for teams that do have cap space.

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents
« Last Edit: Today at 10:45:51 PM by ozgod »
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D