Simply put Boston was better when Brown was not in the game.
Yep, the one guy holding us back this year was definitely Jaylen Brown.
Yeah, this is a misinterpretation of a stat.
Boston outscored other teams when Brown was not in the game, but that does not mean they were better without him.
Fact is Brown played the starter rotation. Pritchard and the other bench guys played the sub rotations and were really good this year (a credit to Mazz and the bench guys).
Brown carried the weight of the team in the starter minutes. The bench built leads in the sub minutes.
Counting stats used to be used just like this to shut down all conversation. "30 points a game. He must be a star!" But anyone who watched the game understood the impact, regardless of the stats. Advanced stats were supposed to help clarify what we saw on the court.
Now on-off or bpm is used the same way to shut down all conversation. Rather than the stat helping us to understand a player, they have become king. But anyone who watches the game understands that Brown was a big reason for our success this year.
Sure, but I do think this year it sort of shows the limitations of Brown as a #1. Brown has the lowest +/- per 100 of the starters on the team at +6.2. Queta led the team at +13 and also had the best differential at +9.8. White's differential was +9.7, so just behind Queta. Brown only had 6.9 WinShares. That is 4th on the Celtics behind Queta, Pritchard, and White. His VORP at 3.3 is 2nd to White on the team.
Brown put up excellent stats, but none of the advanced metrics like him at all. I do think a lot of this is simply, Brown is a poor ball handler and not a very good passer. He led the league in total turnovers after all with 259. He had just 364 assists for an assist to turnover ratio of 1.4, which is not good at all for a lead playmaker. He did draw more fouls, 266, than he committed 191, but that isnt a great ratio either. For comparison Luka drew 306 fouls and committed just 153, while SGA drew 279 and committed just 139. They both had much better assist to turnover ratios as well. Brown's usage was 36.2, which is very high and he just doesnt have the skill set of the other wings up in that range, Luka led the league at 38.1 and SGA was at 33.4. Cade is a much better passer, but actually committed more fouls than he drew. Also had a much lower usage at 30.5.
I think Brown should be on the 1st team ahead of Cade, but it certainly wouldn't be a snub if Cade made it ahead of him because of Cade's passing brilliance and that his team was better than Boston. And Detroit's supporting cast isnt exactly good (after all Tobias Harris and Duncan Robinson start and play the 3rd and 4th mpg).