Author Topic: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis  (Read 1680 times)

Celtic Fan Forever and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #30 on: Today at 01:33:46 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63121
  • Tommy Points: -25462
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
1. Lebron
------------
2. Jokic
3. Curry
4. Giannis
-----------------
5. Durant
-----------------
6. Luka
7. Duncan

That's how I had it prior to the draft.  I would have ranked Duncan higher if I could have taken an earlier season, and I would have only taken Luka to build around with a very specific set of players.  I would have taken Jokic #1, because I think he would have been more fun and interesting to build around than Lebron, who I've had on multiple other CB teams.

I am very interesting why you had Luka as high as 6th.

Also, what type of team you were thinking of around him.

I give Luka high marks for extreme volume scoring at high efficiency combined with good size and creative passing.  He also carried a pretty mediocre Dallas team through a stacked Western Conference to reach the Finals.

You'd need to build a team of athletic shooters and finishers around him, while finding players who aren't extremely ball dominant.  If I'd drafted Luka, I think the ideal would be to trade up for Kawhi, try to get Klay, and then go from there.



I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #31 on: Today at 01:38:13 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63121
  • Tommy Points: -25462
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I thought the draft order was good at selecting heiarchy / tiers between the best players.

My tiers would be something like this

That is just the MVP guys. Not the other folks. 

Tier One = LeBron, Jokic, KG
Tier Two = Duncan, Durant, Kawhi, D-Wade, Kobe, SGA
Tier Three = Steph, Dirk, Giannis, Dwight, Nash, Shaq, Embiid
Tier Four = Harden

I am not a Harden fan. He is on a tier by himself away from the others.

It seems like you're not a Steph or Giannis fan, either, which is strange to me.  Your tiers strike me as odd; to me, Giannis is significantly better than Embiid, and Curry is significantly better than Nash.

I am not a Giannis fan. I am lower on him than most.

I am a Steph fan.

Although my evaluation - how I am evaluating him and other players is different than where I think you are coming from. It looks to me like you are ranking their individual seasons in real life and making your heiarchy from that. I am rating how I think they would do in this setting and making my heiarchy from that standpoint. So we have quite different results.

I don't view Steph as much of an outlier in this fantasy league because he doesn't have the all-round game that the players in My Tier 1+2 have. He is an offensive force but he is too small to have much impact as a defender or rebounder. So I have Steph below those guys like D-Wade and I have him in Tier 3.

I don't think an all-around game matters that much.  For instance, I don't care if Steph can rebound, or if he's a game-changing passer, or if he's more than an above average defender who can lead the league in steals in a regular NBA season.  What he can do is score as efficiently as anybody, and he adds the skill of spacing the floor out to 30 feet.  That creates space that directly benefits his teammates.

In the modern NBA, Steph is much more valuable than a guy like Wade, who lacks in efficiency, outside shooting, and passing.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #32 on: Today at 01:41:58 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53053
  • Tommy Points: 2574
I had Luka on my do-not-draft list. I had him as mid 3rd to late 4th round pick. I had trouble with his game.

I did not see him as valuable in this because his high volume offensive game was necessary. Not on a team with so many stars. So that reduced his positive value for me.

Then the negative value of his bad defense + ball dominance + efficiency which is good but not great. He distorts his teams on both ends of the floor.

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #33 on: Today at 02:03:04 PM »

Online snively

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6006
  • Tommy Points: 503
Does Jimmy Butler count as a game changer? No ring, but the two finals runs rank up there with LBJ's doomed solo efforts.

I don't think he does.  I considered him in the 4th, and traded down, just because I don't think his reputation is as good as his production. 

In the ECF against BOS (2020), he averaged 19 points on .443 eFG%.  Then in 2022, he had three series in a row of eFG% of subpar eFG%:  .438, .448, .451

EFG is going to underrate a FT machine like Butler but yes his incomplete offensive game really hurts his consistency.

But when he's going he's really up there.  His 22/23 season RS and playoffs ranks up with some of the best.
2025 Draft: Chicago Bulls

PG: Chauncey Billups/Deron Williams
SG: Kobe Bryant/Eric Gordon
SF: Jimmy Butler/Danny Granger/Danilo Gallinari
PF: Al Horford/Zion Williamson
C: Yao Ming/Pau Gasol/Tyson Chandler

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #34 on: Today at 02:10:13 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53053
  • Tommy Points: 2574
Durant is an interesting one. I see him as more valuable in this setting than in the regular NBA. His strengths enhanced and his weaknesses better hidden.

Durant is a matchup nightmare. 6-10 to 7-0 with length. Shooting skill. One on one shot creation. He is the best scorer in the league for me. High efficiency high volume scoring. Not ball dominant. Can play with anyone. Nobody has an answer for him.

Other guys - even Kobe - have been slowed down more by great individual defenders / great defenses. More so than Durant. Durant has an outlier skill in this draft that separates him from the pack. Even from the other great scorers in this draft.

The main issue with him IRL (in real life) is that Durant doesn't improve the players around him. He doesn't have the playmaking. He is great at looking after himself but only so-so at setting the table for others. Other stars IRL have been able to out-compete him because of this. But in a setting where you are surrounded by stars (rather than one dimensional role players) who can all create and score themselves - as well as putting more playmaking around a guy like Durant to offset this weakness - that weakness can be hidden. Or at least better hidden (and to a large margin).

I see Durant being the outlier talent he is on Team USA as being similar to what he would be in this setting.

I see the argument, although there's probably some hyperbole.  Durant meets the off-hand criteria I gave, so he's in the conversation.  But, he's not as dominant a presence as Lebron. 

As far as best pure scorer, 32.0 points on .635% TS% is fantastic.  I think I'd prefer Curry's 30.1 points on .669 TS%, though.  I don't really care about height; Curry can get his shot off against anybody.

Curry was more efficient (better FG%, 3PT%, eFG%, TS% and FT%), and he scored more points per possession and more points per minute.

I view Durant and Steph differently. I view Durant as the superior scorer but Steph the superior overall offensive player.

The reason for Durant being the superior scorer is that he has more scoring resilience / consistency in tough situations. Steph is more volatile. He has extreme highs due to his 3 point shooting but more so-so peformances. Steph has shown great consistency in the regular season but not as much in the post-season / Finals. Delladova did a lot to slow Steph down in 2015. Steph didn't come through in 2016.

The reason why I value Steph as the superior offensive player despite Durant being the superior scorer is that Steph is a superior ball-handler and passer. Undervalued passer. Also an even greater off-ball gravity effect on opponents. As I said in by above post, Durant is great at looking after himself but doesn't do much to improve his teammates. Steph does improve his teammates. His superior passing and ball-handling allow him to do that.

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #35 on: Today at 02:16:52 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53053
  • Tommy Points: 2574
There is an interesting debate around Reggie Miller. It relates a bit to Steph Curry. Not much but a bit. Some of the talk in the NBA stat circles are that Reggie's scoring is undervalued historically.

(1) His high efficiency
(2) Off ball scoring has higher portability, doesn't impede teammates, thus more valuable
(3) His scoring upped in the playoffs and against elite defenses like the 1990s NY Knicks. Also, they were slow halfcourt series so Reggie's per 100 possession scoring numbers look much better than his per game numbers in the playoffs.

I want to talk about number two there.

I think the stat heads community gets this wrong. Or at least partially wrong. They are correct that off-ball scoring has high portability and typically has less negative impact on teammates than ball-handlers / iso players / post players ... but, in Reggie's case, he is more extreme in his off-ball scoring vs on-ball scoring.

The Pacers had to build their entire offense around Reggie's off ball movement. It did not matter whether the ball was in his hands or not. Everything was done to enhance him and let him be his most effective self. Guys were not as aggressive looking for scoring opportunities instead preferring to set extra screens to try and get Reggie open. Also, it has a high demand on the quality of the team to find the player once he gets open.

So if we look at Reggie again after Jermaine O'Neal arrives in Indiana. Jermaine O'Neal was a post scorer. He wasn't spending 80% of his time trying to set screens for Reggie. He was posting up and trying to score. More damaging for Reggie was Jermaine's lack of passing skills. He was a black hole in the post. He would take around 20 shots and you would be lucky if he had 2 assists. So the ball would go in there and it would not come out. Ron Artest was an iso / post up player as well and also a dodgy passer. This created a stagnant offense that hurt a movement scorer like Reggie.

So Reggie had two issues. One he had less guys to help him get open when he was paired with scorers rather than role players. Those guys were looking for their own offense instead of sacrificing themselves to set screens repeatedly over and over again for Reggie. Two, Reggie's (player) movement without the ball was not a threat to the opponent without the team passing necessary to find him.

There was the idea that this was just Reggie aging / declining. That is why his scoring dropped from 20ppg to 10-12ppg. But after the Malice in the Palice and guys were injured / suspended. The team switched to an offense being run around the isolation and post games of Jermaine O'Neal & Ron Artest and went back to game-planning their offense for Reggie in the 2nd half of the season. Reggie upped his scoring back up to 17.5ppg after the All-Star break. Reggie could still score. He still had it. It wasn't decline. It was environment. Reggie did not have the right environment in an offense built around Jermaine & Artest to be as effective as he was without them.

----------------------------

This is mostly about Reggie. It relates a bit to Steph but not a huge amount. Steph is a movement scorer as well which is where it relates (partially) to him but Steph is also a more skilled all-round offensive player. More creation off the dribble. More playmaking. He is not as negative effected as Reggie was by a change in offensive sysems. Steph has more offensive / scoring resilience in this regard.

That said, there is a boost (stat inflation) to Steph in GSW from playing in a system that has so much (1) off ball player movement (2) strong team passing (3) a point forward in Draymond who allows Steph to only be a part time PG instead of a full time PG.

Take Steph out of that system / circumstances and I do believe we would see some drop-off from him. He'd still be great. But I don't think he is 30ppg great.

Also, I think you can see this when he plays for Team USA. The team doesn't revolve around him the same way. He is not as impactful. He was great in that Gold Medal game but before that he was something like the 7th best player in the team. He did not have the dominance there that he has for GSW.

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #36 on: Today at 02:17:34 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63121
  • Tommy Points: -25462
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I had Luka on my do-not-draft list. I had him as mid 3rd to late 4th round pick. I had trouble with his game.

I did not see him as valuable in this because his high volume offensive game was necessary. Not on a team with so many stars. So that reduced his positive value for me.

Then the negative value of his bad defense + ball dominance + efficiency which is good but not great. He distorts his teams on both ends of the floor.

Where do you draw the line for good versus great efficiency?   As a rule of thumb, anything over .600 for a volume scorer is great / elite to me.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #37 on: Today at 02:20:29 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53053
  • Tommy Points: 2574
Does Jimmy Butler count as a game changer? No ring, but the two finals runs rank up there with LBJ's doomed solo efforts.

I don't think he does.  I considered him in the 4th, and traded down, just because I don't think his reputation is as good as his production. 

In the ECF against BOS (2020), he averaged 19 points on .443 eFG%.  Then in 2022, he had three series in a row of eFG% of subpar eFG%:  .438, .448, .451

EFG is going to underrate a FT machine like Butler but yes his incomplete offensive game really hurts his consistency.

But when he's going he's really up there.  His 22/23 season RS and playoffs ranks up with some of the best.

Quote
just because I don't think his reputation is as good as his production.

I feel the opposite way with Jimmy. I feel his production is much better than his reputation. That he is under-appreciated / under-valued.

2 trips to the Finals and 1 trip to the ECF in 4 years. His 2nd best player was Bam. No 3rd star. A solid but unexceptional supporting cast. 2 trips to the Finals is what Stockton and K Malone did. It was a phenomenal achievement for Jimmy (and Bam).

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #38 on: Today at 02:24:07 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53053
  • Tommy Points: 2574
I had Luka on my do-not-draft list. I had him as mid 3rd to late 4th round pick. I had trouble with his game.

I did not see him as valuable in this because his high volume offensive game was necessary. Not on a team with so many stars. So that reduced his positive value for me.

Then the negative value of his bad defense + ball dominance + efficiency which is good but not great. He distorts his teams on both ends of the floor.

Where do you draw the line for good versus great efficiency?   As a rule of thumb, anything over .600 for a volume scorer is great / elite to me.

The league average TS% has risen a lot in the last few years.

It was 57.5% last season compared to 54-55% in the past.

So Luka at 60% today is above average but not great. Only +2.5% relative TS%. Good but not great.

When the league average TS% was 54-55%, 60% was an elite figure. 60% today would be the equivalent to 56.5-57.5% back then.

I don't know what the marker would be exactly. But I would guess around 5-6% and higher above the league average.

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #39 on: Today at 03:14:18 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63121
  • Tommy Points: -25462
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Quote
That said, there is a boost (stat inflation) to Steph in GSW from playing in a system that has so much (1) off ball player movement (2) strong team passing (3) a point forward in Draymond who allows Steph to only be a part time PG instead of a full time PG.

Take Steph out of that system / circumstances and I do believe we would see some drop-off from him. He'd still be great. But I don't think he is 30ppg great.

Also, I think you can see this when he plays for Team USA. The team doesn't revolve around him the same way. He is not as impactful. He was great in that Gold Medal game but before that he was something like the 7th best player in the team. He did not have the dominance there that he has for GSW.

Honestly, I think Olympic stats are nonsense.  They're irrelevant to judging NBA players.  If I bought into Olympic stats, I'd think that Tatum and Haliburton were scrubs.

As for Curry, I'm not sure what system he wouldn't work in and still be an absolute scoring machine.  I think every team in the league would shape their system to take maximum advantage of Curry.  He's dominated with David Lee and Harrison Barnes as starters (and Draymond averaged less than 2.0 assists off the bench), and with Luke Walton coaching him.  He won a title with Jordan Poole, Andrew Wiggins and Kevin Looney starting.

Curry is going to go down as either the second or third best player of this era, depending upon whether Jokic wins more.  Lebron will be #1 (even with some fall off), but Curry has the rings, the stats, and the aura.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg

Re: 2025 CB Historical Draft - Player Analysis
« Reply #40 on: Today at 03:26:19 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 63121
  • Tommy Points: -25462
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I had Luka on my do-not-draft list. I had him as mid 3rd to late 4th round pick. I had trouble with his game.

I did not see him as valuable in this because his high volume offensive game was necessary. Not on a team with so many stars. So that reduced his positive value for me.

Then the negative value of his bad defense + ball dominance + efficiency which is good but not great. He distorts his teams on both ends of the floor.

Where do you draw the line for good versus great efficiency?   As a rule of thumb, anything over .600 for a volume scorer is great / elite to me.

The league average TS% has risen a lot in the last few years.

It was 57.5% last season compared to 54-55% in the past.

So Luka at 60% today is above average but not great. Only +2.5% relative TS%. Good but not great.

When the league average TS% was 54-55%, 60% was an elite figure. 60% today would be the equivalent to 56.5-57.5% back then.

I don't know what the marker would be exactly. But I would guess around 5-6% and higher above the league average.

So .625 - .635 to be great / elite?

That seems high.  Certain low-volume bigs and role players might hit that.  But, among volume scorers (> 20ppg), who ranks that highly?  Jokic.  Sabonis.  Durant.  Lavine.  SGA.  KAT.  Giannis.  Butler.  All were above .625 last season.

Just below last season were Lillard (.621) Curry and Porzingis (both .618).

Doncic was at .617 in 2024.  Volume scorers ahead of his:  Jokic, Giannis, Porzingis, Embiid (played 39 games), Sabonis, SGA, Lebron, Durant, Butler, KAT, Davis (with Curry being at .616).

So, roughly the 10th most efficient volume scorer.  Does that make Doncic elite?  I'd say so.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:31:21 PM by Roy H. »


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

KP / Giannis / Turkuglu / Jrue / Curry
Sabonis / Brand / A. Thompson / Oladipo / Brunson
Jordan / Bowen

Redshirt:  Cooper Flagg