Author Topic: Celtics current Roster  (Read 10220 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #45 on: July 04, 2025, 09:20:13 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52593
  • Tommy Points: 2562
Honestly I think the most depressing thing about the Celtics upcoming season is that there is almost nothing to look forward to.

Usually when you know a Celtics team is going to struggle, there are at least young players you can watch develop. But the current crop of drafted prospects are extremely raw or very limited in their skillset.

I think it will be okay watching Scheierman and Hugo.  Fingers crossed at least.

I like Hugo Gonzalez and his potential but he is just so raw.

I feel like in past seasons Hugo would be a stash draft pick so he can develop properly before coming to the NBA. Hugo was only averaging 5 points in the Spanish league and 1.9 in the Euro league.

I think both Hugo & Williams will almost exclusively play in Maine.

Is there any difference between Hugo Gonzalez and Josh Minott as a prospect heading into next season?

They both seem fairly similar. Minott actually looks the more interesting of the two to me. More athleticism. More driving on offense. More defensive playmaking.

Well for one Gonzalez is more than 3 years younger. Minot will be 23 in November, Hugo won't even be 20 until February.

Sorry I didn't say that clearly. I meant for next season - in terms of what we can see from either one of them next year alone.

In terms of things to look forward to seeing / watching next season.

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #46 on: July 05, 2025, 09:24:11 AM »

Online Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13513
  • Tommy Points: 1018
Honestly I think the most depressing thing about the Celtics upcoming season is that there is almost nothing to look forward to.

Usually when you know a Celtics team is going to struggle, there are at least young players you can watch develop. But the current crop of drafted prospects are extremely raw or very limited in their skillset.

I think it will be okay watching Scheierman and Hugo.  Fingers crossed at least.

I am optimistic about Amari Williams also in terms of interest in how he develops.  Simons too.  I have interest to see what he can offer, what kind of value he can set for himself.

I don't think A Simons is much of a prospect at this point. He mostly is what he is. And that is a good player. He can improve his defense some but his offensive game looks fully cooked.

My point with Simons is the question of what kind of value he can set for himself.  I am not as familiar with his game as some others seem to be.  But I don't think you know what you got until you get the player on your team.  I don't expect radically different box scores from him.  He probably will be around 20 pts / 5 assts but I want to see everything else.  The last 4 seasons, he has averaged between 8-9 3PA, hovering around 38% made.  He is just 26 and will be playing for a contract.  Can he mature his game, become a little more efficient, get a little better on defense?  The other stuff will be important in setting his deadline trade value.

I don't think his value is baked already.  Right now, it is probably low, close to the Sexton deal.  That is probably the floor (can't go much lower than that).  But I think the value can go back up, especially if BOS is willing to take back some salary (players on multi-year contracts).

For the right player, I could see BOS packaging say Simons, Hauser, and the 2026 pick (likely a very good pick by the trade deadline).  That could get back a very good player or a couple of decent, solid players.  Matching up for a deal like this is hard but the landscape for teams and players can change very rapidly.  Some players that you think would never be available, can suddenly be available.  20 point scorers are 20 point scorers.  They have value (Herro, Poole got big contracts).  I am sure Simons wants to get himself in a position to get a good contract from someone.

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #47 on: July 05, 2025, 09:56:58 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52593
  • Tommy Points: 2562
I don't think his value is baked already.  Right now, it is probably low, close to the Sexton deal.  That is probably the floor (can't go much lower than that).  But I think the value can go back up, especially if BOS is willing to take back some salary (players on multi-year contracts).

I don't think his value will change much. His main issue is the type of player / player prototype he is. He is a tweener stuck in between two guard positions.

We can be nice and call him a combo guard but he is more a tweener than a combo guard. Jrue & D White are combo guards who can play both guard positions at a high level. A Simons (like C Sexton) is a tweener guard who can play neither guard position at a high level. His lack of PG skills offensively hurt him there. His lack of size & defense hurt him at SG. Those attributes are unlikely to change.

CJ McCollum was one of the most accomplished guards of this type and Portland could never find a trade that offered them a comparable return. They ended up trading him for a 1st round pick to New Orleans. Nobody would give up value for him. The guy just finished his 10th straight season averaging 20ppg.

It just isn't a player prototype (tweener guards) that does well in the trade market. This has been the case for several years now. That is unlikely to change.

---------------

I like A Simons. I think he is one of the better players of this prototype. I compare him to Jason Terry. An elite shooter, a very good scorer, a solid ball-handler with some playmaking. You get them in the right situation and they can be valuable on court (even as a tweener guard).

I'd love to see A Simons at PG next to a big playmaking wing like a LeBron, Luka, Harden. That sort of thing. He could do great things in that situation. Just like J Terry did alongside Dirk.

A Simons needs to play PG defensively. That makes it hard to build a roster with enough passing / playmaking. That is why I would like to see him with a playmaking wing.

Boston is actually close to an ideal situation for A Simons. D White is an ideal backcourt partner for A Simons. White has the size to cover bigger SGs that A Simons cannot and has the PG skills to help A Simons run the offense. Plus we have Tatum who while not quite as good a playmaking wing as the guys mentioned above, he is still very good in his own right. So this is a very good stuation here in Boston for A Simons.

I wouldn't rule out A Simons being here long term. Especially if he can upgrade his defense from abject (bottom 10%) to below average but passable (around 40th percentile) for the PG position. He is a quality player - comparable to Jason Terry - and he has low trade value relative to his on-court skills so keeping him may end up happening. It may end up being the best option.

For the right player, I could see BOS packaging say Simons, Hauser, and the 2026 pick (likely a very good pick by the trade deadline).  That could get back a very good player or a couple of decent, solid players.

I agree. I see A Simons more as the cap filler in this trade. I believe the large majority of the value in this trade package will come from the draft pick. A Simons will have some value but small. Like CJ McCollum above.

I see coupling A Simons (contract, positive modest trade value) with picks as our best route to getting another difference maker alongside Tatum, Jaylen and D White. This would be my primary strategy moving forward for the team. The best route to getting another difference maker.

I was thinking of 2-3 picks with A Simons ... but yeah, you are right, that Celtics pick could be a top 10 pick next year. So that will be very valuable in its own right. You might be able to get such a player just with that pick + A Simons. Or, if an even better player becomes available, that pick + future picks + A Simons.

-----------------------------

I would be trying to sign A Simons to a contract extension. I would be finding out what he is looking for on his next deal. If you could get him for under $30mil per year, that would be a good deal. If you could get it down nearer to $25mil. If he wants more than $30mil, I think you play out the year and see what the market looks like next summer.

The problem is if we lose him in FA we have no way of replacing him because we will be over the cap.

Note: I would be trying to sign A Simons to an extension in both scenarios (1) as an option to keep him long term because he is a good player (comparable to Jason Terry) (2) to keep him on the books in order to protect him as trade filler.

I don't see A Simons as the headline piece in a trade deal. More cap filler with modest positive add-on value. If he is the headline piece, we are not going to get much back for him. However, if the picks are the headline piece, we can get something valuable for them and use A Simons' contract as a cap makeweight to get such a player.

---------------

Sorry, just to go back and reiterate something.

A Simons' trade value will not change singificantly because the main problem is that he is a tweener guard. That is unlikely to change. He is unlikely to suddenly develop above average PG skills. Nor is he going to grow bigger and suddenly be able to defend the SG position. He is just too small.

It doesn't really matter if he shoots slightly better or defenders a bit better. He will still be a tweener. Not enough PG skills to play the role on offense. Not enough size to defend the SG position. He is stuck in between two positions.

Whatever improvements he manages to make it will only make a minor difference to his trade value because the main issue that is effecting his trade value / lowering his value will not have changed. He still will not be a true PG. He still will not be big enough to play SG defensively.

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #48 on: July 05, 2025, 10:50:58 AM »

Offline tazzmaniac

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8971
  • Tommy Points: 581
Honestly I think the most depressing thing about the Celtics upcoming season is that there is almost nothing to look forward to.

Usually when you know a Celtics team is going to struggle, there are at least young players you can watch develop. But the current crop of drafted prospects are extremely raw or very limited in their skillset.

I think it will be okay watching Scheierman and Hugo.  Fingers crossed at least.

I am optimistic about Amari Williams also in terms of interest in how he develops.  Simons too.  I have interest to see what he can offer, what kind of value he can set for himself.

I don't think A Simons is much of a prospect at this point. He mostly is what he is. And that is a good player. He can improve his defense some but his offensive game looks fully cooked.

My point with Simons is the question of what kind of value he can set for himself.  I am not as familiar with his game as some others seem to be.  But I don't think you know what you got until you get the player on your team.  I don't expect radically different box scores from him.  He probably will be around 20 pts / 5 assts but I want to see everything else.  The last 4 seasons, he has averaged between 8-9 3PA, hovering around 38% made.  He is just 26 and will be playing for a contract.  Can he mature his game, become a little more efficient, get a little better on defense?  The other stuff will be important in setting his deadline trade value.

I don't think his value is baked already.  Right now, it is probably low, close to the Sexton deal.  That is probably the floor (can't go much lower than that).  But I think the value can go back up, especially if BOS is willing to take back some salary (players on multi-year contracts).

For the right player, I could see BOS packaging say Simons, Hauser, and the 2026 pick (likely a very good pick by the trade deadline).  That could get back a very good player or a couple of decent, solid players.  Matching up for a deal like this is hard but the landscape for teams and players can change very rapidly.  Some players that you think would never be available, can suddenly be available.  20 point scorers are 20 point scorers.  They have value (Herro, Poole got big contracts).  I am sure Simons wants to get himself in a position to get a good contract from someone.
Simons is making 27.6M this season so he already got a big contract and he's on an expiring contract.  It would be hard to trade him at the deadline and he's not going to return much value if he is traded regardless of what he does next season.   

The Sexton trade just showed the value of small guards who are 20pt scores and bad defenders.  Poole and Sadiq Bey just got traded for McCollum and Olynyk. 

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #49 on: July 06, 2025, 01:56:02 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15229
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Is today the day that they could choose (or choose not to) pickup the contract of JD Davison?

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #50 on: July 06, 2025, 02:08:01 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7921
  • Tommy Points: 1029
Is today the day that they could choose (or choose not to) pickup the contract of JD Davison?

No.  His option was picked up last week or so, but it is also a non-guaranteed option, so it doesn?t begin to pay until the regular season begins.

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #51 on: July 06, 2025, 04:05:29 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52593
  • Tommy Points: 2562
Should Minott start at PF?

Keep Hauser as backup SF. Avoid Jaylen having to defend PFs. Minott gives us an active defensive player and opportunistic (albeit limited) scorer. Rather than G Niang who is an offense-only no-defense PF. So avoid putting Niang into the starting lineup where opponents can feast on him. Keep him in a bench role.

G: A Simons, Pritchard
G: D White, Scheierman
F: Jaylen, Hauser
F: Minott, G Niang
C: Queta, L Garza

It could even be a 20mpg starting role. Let Hauser & Niang take up the rest of the forward minutes.

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #52 on: July 06, 2025, 04:16:45 PM »

Offline slightly biased bias fan

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1419
  • Tommy Points: 322

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #53 on: July 06, 2025, 06:19:55 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15229
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Should Minott start at PF?

Keep Hauser as backup SF. Avoid Jaylen having to defend PFs. Minott gives us an active defensive player and opportunistic (albeit limited) scorer. Rather than G Niang who is an offense-only no-defense PF. So avoid putting Niang into the starting lineup where opponents can feast on him. Keep him in a bench role.

G: A Simons, Pritchard
G: D White, Scheierman
F: Jaylen, Hauser
F: Minott, G Niang
C: Queta, L Garza

It could even be a 20mpg starting role. Let Hauser & Niang take up the rest of the forward minutes.
Isn?t Hauser more of a proven NBA commodity than Minott? Not sure why they are keeping Hauser if not to fill in for JT.

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #54 on: July 06, 2025, 06:41:48 PM »

Online Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10282
  • Tommy Points: 465
Should Minott start at PF?

Keep Hauser as backup SF. Avoid Jaylen having to defend PFs. Minott gives us an active defensive player and opportunistic (albeit limited) scorer. Rather than G Niang who is an offense-only no-defense PF. So avoid putting Niang into the starting lineup where opponents can feast on him. Keep him in a bench role.

G: A Simons, Pritchard
G: D White, Scheierman
F: Jaylen, Hauser
F: Minott, G Niang
C: Queta, L Garza

It could even be a 20mpg starting role. Let Hauser & Niang take up the rest of the forward minutes.
The more I look at this roster, the more I?m thinking lottery team?may I look into an hobby during the season lol
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #55 on: July 06, 2025, 06:49:46 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52593
  • Tommy Points: 2562
Should Minott start at PF?

Keep Hauser as backup SF. Avoid Jaylen having to defend PFs. Minott gives us an active defensive player and opportunistic (albeit limited) scorer. Rather than G Niang who is an offense-only no-defense PF. So avoid putting Niang into the starting lineup where opponents can feast on him. Keep him in a bench role.

G: A Simons, Pritchard
G: D White, Scheierman
F: Jaylen, Hauser
F: Minott, G Niang
C: Queta, L Garza

It could even be a 20mpg starting role. Let Hauser & Niang take up the rest of the forward minutes.
Isn?t Hauser more of a proven NBA commodity than Minott? Not sure why they are keeping Hauser if not to fill in for JT.

Yes and I would still play Hauser (25-30mpg) more than Minott (~20mpg). I would just start Minott for his defense. Keep Hauser there to anchor the bench with Pritchard. Give us 2 reliable bench players. At the moment it is only Pritchard and a bunch 3rd stringers plus Niang a below average backup PF. Having Pritchard and Hauser together off the bench would anchor those bench units.

Some folks were concerned about Jaylen playing PF defensively next season + being the #1 option offensively + coming off a knee injury. Hauser isn't big enough to defend PFs full time. It would have to be Jaylen. But Minott may be able to do so thus allowing Jaylen to stay at his proper position at SF defensively. 

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #56 on: July 06, 2025, 07:16:07 PM »

Offline Muzzy66

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 980
  • Tommy Points: 177
Should Minott start at PF?

Keep Hauser as backup SF. Avoid Jaylen having to defend PFs. Minott gives us an active defensive player and opportunistic (albeit limited) scorer. Rather than G Niang who is an offense-only no-defense PF. So avoid putting Niang into the starting lineup where opponents can feast on him. Keep him in a bench role.

G: A Simons, Pritchard
G: D White, Scheierman
F: Jaylen, Hauser
F: Minott, G Niang
C: Queta, L Garza

It could even be a 20mpg starting role. Let Hauser & Niang take up the rest of the forward minutes.
Isn?t Hauser more of a proven NBA commodity than Minott? Not sure why they are keeping Hauser if not to fill in for JT.

Yes and I would still play Hauser (25-30mpg) more than Minott (~20mpg). I would just start Minott for his defense. Keep Hauser there to anchor the bench with Pritchard. Give us 2 reliable bench players. At the moment it is only Pritchard and a bunch 3rd stringers plus Niang a below average backup PF. Having Pritchard and Hauser together off the bench would anchor those bench units.

Some folks were concerned about Jaylen playing PF defensively next season + being the #1 option offensively + coming off a knee injury. Hauser isn't big enough to defend PFs full time. It would have to be Jaylen. But Minott may be able to do so thus allowing Jaylen to stay at his proper position at SF defensively.

Call me crazy, by my expectation is that Pritchard will be starting, and Simons will be coming off the bench as a 6th man / combo guard. 

Pritchard was huge for the team last year and frankly speaking, I think he's a better overall player and DEFINITELY a better point guard the Simons.  He's also been here for a long time so he has the benefit of loyalty, tenure and knowledge of the system.   I cant think of any reason why you would start Simons over him. 

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #57 on: July 06, 2025, 07:23:45 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52593
  • Tommy Points: 2562
Should Minott start at PF?

Keep Hauser as backup SF. Avoid Jaylen having to defend PFs. Minott gives us an active defensive player and opportunistic (albeit limited) scorer. Rather than G Niang who is an offense-only no-defense PF. So avoid putting Niang into the starting lineup where opponents can feast on him. Keep him in a bench role.

G: A Simons, Pritchard
G: D White, Scheierman
F: Jaylen, Hauser
F: Minott, G Niang
C: Queta, L Garza

It could even be a 20mpg starting role. Let Hauser & Niang take up the rest of the forward minutes.
Isn?t Hauser more of a proven NBA commodity than Minott? Not sure why they are keeping Hauser if not to fill in for JT.

Yes and I would still play Hauser (25-30mpg) more than Minott (~20mpg). I would just start Minott for his defense. Keep Hauser there to anchor the bench with Pritchard. Give us 2 reliable bench players. At the moment it is only Pritchard and a bunch 3rd stringers plus Niang a below average backup PF. Having Pritchard and Hauser together off the bench would anchor those bench units.

Some folks were concerned about Jaylen playing PF defensively next season + being the #1 option offensively + coming off a knee injury. Hauser isn't big enough to defend PFs full time. It would have to be Jaylen. But Minott may be able to do so thus allowing Jaylen to stay at his proper position at SF defensively.

Call me crazy, by my expectation is that Pritchard will be starting, and Simons will be coming off the bench as a 6th man / combo guard. 

Pritchard was huge for the team last year and frankly speaking, I think he's a better overall player and DEFINITELY a better point guard the Simons.  He's also been here for a long time so he has the benefit of loyalty, tenure and knowledge of the system.   I cant think of any reason why you would start Simons over him.

I agree. I rate Pritchard above A Simons also. Largely due to Pritchard's superior defense. Pritchard closer to a middle of the pack defender. A Simons near the bottom of the pack. Offensively, I think they are close to one another. A Simons a better shot creator and scorer. Pritchard a better team player.

I expect A Simons to start. Not because he is the better player but because he is paid more money. It is not fair but it is often what happens. Especially if the gap between the two players isn't that large.

I am not sure A Simons is ready to expect a bench role / 6th man role yet. It may be problematic for him. He might cause issues, ask for trade, or just leave as a FA with no way for the team to replace him. Pritchard has already accepted and excelled within the 6th man role. He won't rock the boat.

I think Prichard starts on about 10-15 teams in the league which is probably about the same for A Simons.

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #58 on: July 06, 2025, 08:20:26 PM »

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34475
  • Tommy Points: 1596
The roster blows, but doesn't blow enough. Need to be worst team in the league kind of bad next year, not this 30 win garbage of a team.
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Celtics current Roster
« Reply #59 on: July 06, 2025, 08:48:40 PM »

Offline hardlyyardley

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1209
  • Tommy Points: 149
Jay Huff would have been a better choice than Garza