I miss Danny's drafting...

[BitterJim]

He did have a soft spot for tweeners.  I think he took ball players who played well but often slipped due to their size.

Yeah, I think it's the basketball version of "Moneyball":  teams need to look at where they can get the most production relative to dollars spent.  Often, that will come from guys who lack ideal size, etc.

100%. He saw value in tweeners and guards who couldn't shoot, and he found some very good players that way (and plenty of dudes... the draft is a crapshoot). He (like everyone else) would have preferred skilled boys with great size and guards who could do it all, but where we were picking everyone had major flaws. You just have to decide which flaws are deal breakers and which ones you can live with

[Moranis]

The Kyrie trade is a hard one for me to wrap my head around in hindsight.

At the time, I hated it, mostly because I thought Kyrie and IT4 were essentially equal as players.  I was wrong on that; IT was completely cooked after his injury.

The trade was:  IT, Crowder, Zizic, #1 (Collin Sexton) for Kyrie

None of the outgoing players amounted to much.  Crowder remained a rotation player for a few more years, but he was never a core piece.  Collin Sexton turned out to be a decent player, but never a difference maker.

In return, we got two seasons of All-Star play, including Kyrie making 2nd Team All-NBA. 

At the time, giving up the #7 pick for a perennial All-Star made sense, assuming the team knew that IT4 was finished.  Danny's plan thereafter was to add Anthony Davis, which seemed like a good bet.  He was hoping for a core of Horford / Davis / Tatum / Hayward / Kyrie (with Brown and Smart likely being traded in the Davis deal).

If Kyrie had kept his head on straight, that could have set up a dynasty.  So, it's hard for me to say it was a bad trade based upon the thought process.  And, I don't see it as a disaster, because we didn't end up losing any core pieces (and quickly replaced Kyrie with Kemba, who looked like an All-NBA player until getting hurt).

When I think a "disaster" trade, I think more in line with Joe Johnson for Rodney Rogers.

It wasn't Sexton it was the 8th pick in the draft.  Sexton almost certainly would not have been Danny's selection.  I don't know if Danny would have taken SGA who went 11th, but SGA was certainly more Danny's profile than Sexton was.  If I had to bet, I think Danny would have taken Mikal Bridges who went 10th or maybe Miles Bridges who went 12th.  Michael Porter was also on the board as teams were worried about his back.  He ended up 14th.  During the draft, I was stunned at how far Porter fell.

[Moranis]

Kyrie trade was a calculated gamble.  It didn't pan out but I wouldn't label it a disaster.  It didn't set the franchise back that much in the grand scheme of things and, as Roy mentioned, Celtics were able to sell high on IT (who was never the same) and nothing outgoing really came back to bite the team in the butt.

I agree with this.  I never viewed the Kyrie trade as a bad trade.  The big "what if" here is the Gordon Hayward injury.  Kyrie is a head case, and a hard guy for fans to root for, but he was a very good player in the prime of his career at the time of the trade, a superstar.  I loved IT, but he really had one superstar season.  He wasn't a superstar before and he wasn't after.

I think he had much worse trades, such at the following:

Danny Ainge (in his first year as Celtics GM) traded Eric Williams, Tony Battie, and Kedrick Brown to the Cleveland Cavaliers for Ricky Davis, Chris Mihm, Michael Stewart, and a second-round pick.

Not sure what we got for that second round pick but Ricky Davis was a disaster in my mind.  This trade caused Jim O'Brien to resign as coach.

Davis was a knucklehead, but he was fine here.  The #2 turned into Ryan Gomes and we ended up trading Davis for Wally and a potential #1.

2003-2007 was a complex stretch.  The team was always in cap hell trying to dig out of mistakes mostly made by the previous regime and, on the court, you had a flawed team regressing after the '01-02 ECF run.  Danny recognized this but it also required making a lot of somewhat lateral moves to try and dig out from under it.

It was a multi year project to clean up the mess and figure out the direction of the team.

They were in cap hell in large part because of moves Danny made.  Baker was the only bad contract when he took over and he was gone soon after.  Trading Walker, Williams, Battie for LaFrentz, Mills, Davis is what really hamstrung the team going forward.  Raef, in particular, was an albatross contract. 

[Moranis]

Kyrie trade was a calculated gamble.  It didn't pan out but I wouldn't label it a disaster.  It didn't set the franchise back that much in the grand scheme of things and, as Roy mentioned, Celtics were able to sell high on IT (who was never the same) and nothing outgoing really came back to bite the team in the butt.

I mean SGA would be nice.  But who needs the reigning MVP and likely back-to-back winner.

I've said on here many times the biggest flaw in that trade that Danny made was not necessarily acquiring Kyrie but failing to pull the trigger on the necessary follow up trade.  Kyrie was always a Robin, he needed a Batman, and I'm sorry Hayward wasn't a Batman.  Had Danny pulled the trigger with the Spurs and acquired Kawhi, the Kyrie trade would have been like Ray Allen was while Kawhi would have been the KG.  It would have cost Brown and Smart, but Boston almost certainly would have won the 2019 title that Kawhi led Toronto to if Boston had Kawhi, Kyrie, Tatum, Horford, Hayward, Rozier, Morris, Baynes, Theis.  Team might have actually beaten a healthy Warriors that year and they would have steamrolled through the east. 

You can't give up quality assets to acquire Robin and then not make the available move to acquire Batman.