Author Topic: Offseason Thread  (Read 227780 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #540 on: Yesterday at 04:58:43 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7921
  • Tommy Points: 1029
Seeing rumors of Smart may be getting bought out.......

I'd take him back here in a second on a vet minimum.  Cut Davison, dump Walsh.

dems is fighting words! I'd rather watch my kids throw a handful of quarters into the wishing well at the Mall. At least they'll get some of them in.

My kid has already thrown her wishing well coins in the hope of Marcus? return.  She is about a good a shot as Marcus, but maybe she got at least one in.

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #541 on: Yesterday at 05:05:42 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52593
  • Tommy Points: 2562
There is no clear role for M Smart here.

We have 3 guards in D White, A Simons and Pritchard. Very few minutes leftover behind them. Not enough for Smart. They would have to trade A Simons to clear enough playing time for Smart to have a significant role here.

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #542 on: Yesterday at 05:09:51 PM »

Online blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19668
  • Tommy Points: 1622
Seeing rumors of Smart may be getting bought out.......

I'd take him back here in a second on a vet minimum.  Cut Davison, dump Walsh.

dems is fighting words! I'd rather watch my kids throw a handful of quarters into the wishing well at the Mall. At least they'll get some of them in.

My kid has already thrown her wishing well coins in the hope of Marcus? return.  She is about a good a shot as Marcus, but maybe she got at least one in.

If he is at the vet min absolutely. 

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #543 on: Yesterday at 05:26:07 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13442
  • Tommy Points: 1708
I don?t think Smart is coming back. Moving him allowed the J?s to become leaders of the team. Also, he seems washed at this point.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 06:05:02 PM by Goldstar88 »
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #544 on: Yesterday at 05:30:50 PM »

Offline keevsnick

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6683
  • Tommy Points: 649
The Jazz opening up a 26 million dollar TPE is certainly interesting. Thats not enough to take Simons outright, but it could very well serve as a final dumping ground for contracts the Celtics don't want in a Simons deal. There might even be a way to get Walker Kessler if the C's throw in a first.

As an example:

Bucks get Simons
Jazz get Kuzma, 2031 first round draft pick from Bucks, 2027 first round draft pick from Celtics.
Celtics get 22.5 million dollar TPE, completely out of tax, Walker Kessler



« Last Edit: Yesterday at 05:36:23 PM by keevsnick »

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #545 on: Yesterday at 05:39:59 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62601
  • Tommy Points: -25476
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
There is no clear role for M Smart here.

We have 3 guards in D White, A Simons and Pritchard. Very few minutes leftover behind them. Not enough for Smart. They would have to trade A Simons to clear enough playing time for Smart to have a significant role here.

There would be after we dump Simons to get below the tax.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #546 on: Yesterday at 06:32:57 PM »

Offline tazzmaniac

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8971
  • Tommy Points: 581
The Athletic story on Beal's potential buyout mentioned a CBA quirk affecting Suns ability to stretch the buyout.
Quote
Because of a quirk in the collective bargaining agreement, Beal, who has $110.8 million and two years remaining on his contract, must give back at least $13.8 million for the Suns to be allowed to stretch him. If he did, Phoenix would then have a dead cap hit of $19.4 million on its books in every season through 2029-30.

Anyone know what this is about?  I'm wondering why it doesn't apply to the Buck's buyout and stretch of Dame. 

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #547 on: Yesterday at 06:37:30 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7921
  • Tommy Points: 1029
The Athletic story on Beal's potential buyout mentioned a CBA quirk affecting Suns ability to stretch the buyout.
Quote
Because of a quirk in the collective bargaining agreement, Beal, who has $110.8 million and two years remaining on his contract, must give back at least $13.8 million for the Suns to be allowed to stretch him. If he did, Phoenix would then have a dead cap hit of $19.4 million on its books in every season through 2029-30.

Anyone know what this is about?  I'm wondering why it doesn't apply to the Buck's buyout and stretch of Dame.

You aren?t allowed to have more than 15% of the cap in stretched contracts.  The Suns have already stretched contracts in the past that are still counting against the cap this year, so they had less available room to stretch than the Bucks.

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #548 on: Yesterday at 06:41:24 PM »

Offline tazzmaniac

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8971
  • Tommy Points: 581
The Athletic story on Beal's potential buyout mentioned a CBA quirk affecting Suns ability to stretch the buyout.
Quote
Because of a quirk in the collective bargaining agreement, Beal, who has $110.8 million and two years remaining on his contract, must give back at least $13.8 million for the Suns to be allowed to stretch him. If he did, Phoenix would then have a dead cap hit of $19.4 million on its books in every season through 2029-30.

Anyone know what this is about?  I'm wondering why it doesn't apply to the Buck's buyout and stretch of Dame.

You aren?t allowed to have more than 15% of the cap in stretched contracts.  The Suns have already stretched contracts in the past that are still counting against the cap this year, so they had less available room to stretch than the Bucks.
Thanks.  I knew about the 15% limit.  I didn't know the Suns already had bought out and stretched other players still on their books. 

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #549 on: Yesterday at 06:50:37 PM »

Offline tazzmaniac

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8971
  • Tommy Points: 581
Quote
Orlando Magic star Paolo Banchero agreed to a five-year, $239 million maximum rookie contract extension that could reach $287 million, Mike Miller of LIFT Sports Management told ESPN on Monday.

Miller said Banchero's new deal includes triggers to elevate the base salary to the supermax should the Magic franchise cornerstone make either All-NBA team, either All-Defensive team or earn MVP or Defensive Player of the Year honors next season.

Now Magic fans need to say their prayers that he doesn't qualify for the supermax. 

Re: Offseason Thread
« Reply #550 on: Yesterday at 07:24:45 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25498
  • Tommy Points: 2719
Quote
Orlando Magic star Paolo Banchero agreed to a five-year, $239 million maximum rookie contract extension that could reach $287 million, Mike Miller of LIFT Sports Management told ESPN on Monday.

Miller said Banchero's new deal includes triggers to elevate the base salary to the supermax should the Magic franchise cornerstone make either All-NBA team, either All-Defensive team or earn MVP or Defensive Player of the Year honors next season.

Now Magic fans need to say their prayers that he doesn't qualify for the supermax.

The incentive should be the opposite. Fans should always see the benefit in their players growth and excellence.  To root for lower achievement is the unfortunate outcome of a bad agreement. Obviously, Magic fans will want him to be as great as he can be, but in today?s NBA that is a costly outcome.