Author Topic: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)  (Read 253260 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #240 on: June 26, 2025, 09:43:56 PM »

Offline Atzar

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10232
  • Tommy Points: 1892
Kentucky fans say he has a pretty unique skillset as a passing big but can?t shoot at all and plays undisciplined defense.

Not excited, but frankly, I wasn?t excited about the options at 32 either. 

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #241 on: June 26, 2025, 09:44:23 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32768
  • Tommy Points: 838
  • Larry Bird for President
Amari Williams.  analysis is he can rebound and that's about it

Nah, he?s a very good high post passer.

He is a guy that will be in Maine. Nothing much more than G league roster fodder. Rough on defense and has no offensive skill set.

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #242 on: June 26, 2025, 09:47:08 PM »

Offline tazzmaniac

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8916
  • Tommy Points: 579
I would have taken Bogoljub Markovic. 

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #243 on: June 26, 2025, 09:47:42 PM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13457
  • Tommy Points: 1014
I hear he is a much better passer than Queta.

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #244 on: June 26, 2025, 09:47:54 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32768
  • Tommy Points: 838
  • Larry Bird for President
I am guessing we will see no trades of moving out Simons, Niang, Hauser or movement (if they have any) until July 1st?


Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #245 on: June 26, 2025, 09:47:57 PM »

Offline tonydelk

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2136
  • Tommy Points: 517
Kentucky fans say he has a pretty unique skillset as a passing big but can?t shoot at all and plays undisciplined defense.

Not excited, but frankly, I wasn?t excited about the options at 32 either.

A lot of mocks didn't even have him in it and others in the late 50s.  Im normally a lot more positive but this draft has been a joke in my opinion.  Brad needs to accumulate talent not garbage picks.  All this means to me is he will sign Peterson to the big club and replace his 2 way spot. 

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #246 on: June 26, 2025, 09:48:08 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13367
  • Tommy Points: 1706
Course Proctor goes to Cleveland. God I hate the Cavs..  :blank:
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #247 on: June 26, 2025, 09:48:38 PM »

Offline Smartacus

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2163
  • Tommy Points: 321
I would have taken Bogoljub Markovic.

Ya that kind of stings, seems like he should have been the pick but I also accept Amari Williams.

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #248 on: June 26, 2025, 09:49:31 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13367
  • Tommy Points: 1706
I hear he is a much better passer than Queta.

Oh nice. So a Point center?
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #249 on: June 26, 2025, 09:49:34 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7354
  • Tommy Points: 569
Sounds like a Kornet wannabe - except that Kornet moves better. Would love to know the thought process here.

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #250 on: June 26, 2025, 09:49:41 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62519
  • Tommy Points: -25479
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I would have taken Bogoljub Markovic.

I know nothing about him, but he's at least got upside.

I don't understand the point of Williams.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #251 on: June 26, 2025, 09:50:08 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32768
  • Tommy Points: 838
  • Larry Bird for President
Kentucky fans say he has a pretty unique skillset as a passing big but can?t shoot at all and plays undisciplined defense.

Not excited, but frankly, I wasn?t excited about the options at 32 either.

A lot of mocks didn't even have him in it and others in the late 50s.  Im normally a lot more positive but this draft has been a joke in my opinion.  Brad needs to accumulate talent not garbage picks.  All this means to me is he will sign Peterson to the big club and replace his 2 way spot.

Peterson, Davison, Walsh, Niang, Baylor, Tillman and Queta...what a bench.

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #252 on: June 26, 2025, 09:58:52 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13711
  • Tommy Points: 2060
  • Everybody knows what's best for you
We can?t possibly take two late 2nd rounders, but I can?t imagine anybody?s going to trade a future 2nd for 57. I guess our best bet is cash considerations now. I?m sure we would all love that lol

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #253 on: June 26, 2025, 10:00:15 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8856
  • Tommy Points: 289
Drafting guys who are okay being stashed or on two ways.  ::)

Re: Celtics Draft 2025 (picks 46 and 57)
« Reply #254 on: June 26, 2025, 10:01:04 PM »

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19644
  • Tommy Points: 1621
We can?t possibly take two late 2nd rounders, but I can?t imagine anybody?s going to trade a future 2nd for 57. I guess our best bet is cash considerations now. I?m sure we would all love that lol

but why even trade the pick (#32) if you are just going to get someone so bad they won't make the team anyways?
I mean you can do that with a higher pick too, at least make the pick at #32 and get a look at the decent player.