I'm seeing posts online where even if we trade say, 1 of Jrue/KP, and Hauser, we're still not saving that much anyways because we would have to fill their spots on the roster with minimum salaries which would still factor into the luxury tax. Like sure, it would drop from 500M but only to about 400-450 ish. If that's the case, what's the point?
Unless they want to trade Jaylen or BOTH of KP/Jrue but even then you'd have to take back a decent amount of salary since not many teams just have a ton of cap space available.
Like some of the Jaylen trades involve Giannis or a few players from DET (like Duren, Harris, etc.) but some of those guys are also making a lot which would in theory offset it. It's not like you're just dumping these guys and saving their entire salary, you'd have to take back a decent amount since most teams are also having limited cap space or are over.
It's why I'm still hoping they just trade Hauser to save approximately 50M, and pay the 450M. Hauser's 10M accounts for 80M in luxury tax savings if dealt, though they'd still have to add 25-30M with whoever takes Hauser's spot on the roster even if a minimum guy. Hence, the math of about 50M in savings from trading Hauser alone.