Sorry about that everyone - had something come up unexpectedly.
The Washington Generals select the nearly-forgotten Derrick Coleman!
The talent was certainly there. His attitude on the other hand....
I was thinking about selecting D Coleman as well. If V Baker wasn't there, Coleman was in my final thoughts for the pick. I decided on David West over him in the end.
I loved Coleman's rebounding. I wanted a strong rebounder next to Zo but I didn't get one. Good defender too. Wonderful skill-set on offense. Coleman had everything. But I got turned off by his shot selection and inefficiency. Just too many bad jump-shots. His shooting percentages on jump-shots over the years were much worse than I had expected.
I was listening to an interview with Coleman. That one was the Knuckleheads Podcast. He mentioned that he was never the high scorer in Syracuse. In college. I was shocked by that. Especially a #1 overall pick. And he wasn't. I looked it up. Some years he was 2nd, some years 3rd. Maybe even 4th as a freshman. He was saying he didn't care about shot attempts. Only winning.
I was trying to talk myself into that. That he won't shoot too much! It'll be okay! But I didn't buy it. He still took too many jump-shots at various stops along the NBA. Even in a lesser role, still too much.
I was watching a game where Chuck Daly was asked was D Coleman the most difficult player he has ever coached. Daly said yes he was. Said he was moody more than anything. That he could be furious with you at mid-day and be your best friend at dinner time. He was so moody, so all over the place, all the time. That it was draining.
Alternate history time.
1996 Chicago Bulls are looking to add a PF to replace Horace Grant. They have 3 candidates. Dennis Rodman, Derrick Coleman and [name - I don't think he'll get drafted but just in case]. Coleman could've been the 3rd wheel on that Bulls dynasty and won a bunch of rings. Been remembered as a great winner.
Imagine the difference in his legacy.