The one silver lining is that we shot as bad as we possibly could, took as many terrible shots as we could, defended poorly, let them run in transition, and lost by 3 points in overtime. In a way if we had won that it would have just validated their hero ball three approach so in a way it's good they lost. Nothing focuses the mind like being humiliated on national television 
Yeah but they could still shoot a lot worse than tonight, and by that logic, they can only afford 3 more losses with this hero-3-ball approach.
Well it's pretty hard to shoot 15-60...it takes real effort to shoot that bad

We shot 25% or worse in 5 games out of 82 this season, and our worst was 17% vs Orlando so yes it is possible...but it's unlikely.

It's also possible that they stay stubborn and feel like it was just a bad shooting night, instead of bad shot selection, because when you lay it out the way that Gary laid it out, and of course we saw it with our own eyes, they were just chucking 3s in the 2nd half instead of working the ball around, driving into the paint and then kicking it out to move the ball to the open shooter once the Knicks were in rotation. We hardly put them in rotation in the 2nd half because most of the 3s were static, either stepbacks or pullups.
What we also have to worry about is that KAT didn't have a great game tonight and they still won, mainly because of Anunoby's career night. He's a good player but we can't let people like him or Hart beat us.
But if I had to put money on us not shooting that bad again I would feel pretty confident of getting my money back. It's the mental approach I'm more concerned about. Will they write it off to a bad shooting night or accept that their approach was flawed?