Author Topic: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching  (Read 726792 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34400
  • Tommy Points: 1593
From the start of the season through February 26th of this past season, Boston was the top point generating team in ATO plays at 1.28 points per possession tied with Dallas.  I haven't seen data compiled for the full season, but I suspect it isn't much different than it was at the end of February.

In other words, Joe's ATO play calling was good enough to lead the league (even accounting for ORTG relativity, Boston was 5th).

This thread is full of perception that isn't borne in reality.  Actually pretty typical of internet blogs and forums in general.


https://www.basketballinsiders.com/news/nba-study-which-nba-coach-is-the-best-at-calling-plays/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3uTDcyE2VGb9fxAOfejFsHXaNnRK5M1gwG4mlv9n6AOSdzwqr6wJRTu90_aem_jIk-9Vq6ERyyH-VM4sjlHw
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Offline BitterJim

  • NGT
  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9175
  • Tommy Points: 1238
From the start of the season through February 26th of this past season, Boston was the top point generating team in ATO plays at 1.28 points per possession tied with Dallas.  I haven't seen data compiled for the full season, but I suspect it isn't much different than it was at the end of February.

In other words, Joe's ATO play calling was good enough to lead the league (even accounting for ORTG relativity, Boston was 5th).

This thread is full of perception that isn't borne in reality.  Actually pretty typical of internet blogs and forums in general.


https://www.basketballinsiders.com/news/nba-study-which-nba-coach-is-the-best-at-calling-plays/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3uTDcyE2VGb9fxAOfejFsHXaNnRK5M1gwG4mlv9n6AOSdzwqr6wJRTu90_aem_jIk-9Vq6ERyyH-VM4sjlHw

That's interesting, I wouldn't have expected that. TP.

Do you have similar stats for end-of-quarter plays?
I'm bitter.

Offline ozgod

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18731
  • Tommy Points: 1526
From the start of the season through February 26th of this past season, Boston was the top point generating team in ATO plays at 1.28 points per possession tied with Dallas.  I haven't seen data compiled for the full season, but I suspect it isn't much different than it was at the end of February.

In other words, Joe's ATO play calling was good enough to lead the league (even accounting for ORTG relativity, Boston was 5th).

This thread is full of perception that isn't borne in reality.  Actually pretty typical of internet blogs and forums in general.


https://www.basketballinsiders.com/news/nba-study-which-nba-coach-is-the-best-at-calling-plays/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3uTDcyE2VGb9fxAOfejFsHXaNnRK5M1gwG4mlv9n6AOSdzwqr6wJRTu90_aem_jIk-9Vq6ERyyH-VM4sjlHw

That's interesting, I wouldn't have expected that. TP.

Do you have similar stats for end-of-quarter plays?

It's because human beings tend to remember things that fail, or that didn't get done, rather than things that actually did. If something worked you move on to the next thing. But if someone did do something they should have done, you definitely remember it  :police:

That's probably why Brad wasn't worried about Joe to the extent the fans were...he looked at the data, rather than whatever anecdotal evidence he saw in games.
Any odd typos are because I suck at typing on an iPhone :D


Online Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32505
  • Tommy Points: 1721
  • What a Pub Should Be
From the start of the season through February 26th of this past season, Boston was the top point generating team in ATO plays at 1.28 points per possession tied with Dallas.  I haven't seen data compiled for the full season, but I suspect it isn't much different than it was at the end of February.

In other words, Joe's ATO play calling was good enough to lead the league (even accounting for ORTG relativity, Boston was 5th).

This thread is full of perception that isn't borne in reality.  Actually pretty typical of internet blogs and forums in general.


https://www.basketballinsiders.com/news/nba-study-which-nba-coach-is-the-best-at-calling-plays/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3uTDcyE2VGb9fxAOfejFsHXaNnRK5M1gwG4mlv9n6AOSdzwqr6wJRTu90_aem_jIk-9Vq6ERyyH-VM4sjlHw

That's interesting, I wouldn't have expected that. TP.

Do you have similar stats for end-of-quarter plays?

It's because human beings tend to remember things that fail, or that didn't get done, rather than things that actually did. If something worked you move on to the next thing. But if someone did do something they should have done, you definitely remember it  :police:

That's probably why Brad wasn't worried about Joe to the extent the fans were...he looked at the data, rather than whatever anecdotal evidence he saw in games.

Absolutely.

I still wonder what would've happened had the Celtics got swept in the '23 conference finals rather clawing back.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Offline Silas

  • 2020 CelticsStrong Draft Guru
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12805
  • Tommy Points: 2167
From the start of the season through February 26th of this past season, Boston was the top point generating team in ATO plays at 1.28 points per possession tied with Dallas.  I haven't seen data compiled for the full season, but I suspect it isn't much different than it was at the end of February.

In other words, Joe's ATO play calling was good enough to lead the league (even accounting for ORTG relativity, Boston was 5th).

This thread is full of perception that isn't borne in reality.  Actually pretty typical of internet blogs and forums in general.


https://www.basketballinsiders.com/news/nba-study-which-nba-coach-is-the-best-at-calling-plays/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3uTDcyE2VGb9fxAOfejFsHXaNnRK5M1gwG4mlv9n6AOSdzwqr6wJRTu90_aem_jIk-9Vq6ERyyH-VM4sjlHw

That's interesting, I wouldn't have expected that. TP.

Do you have similar stats for end-of-quarter plays?

It's because human beings tend to remember things that fail, or that didn't get done, rather than things that actually did. If something worked you move on to the next thing. But if someone did do something they should have done, you definitely remember it  :police:

That's probably why Brad wasn't worried about Joe to the extent the fans were...he looked at the data, rather than whatever anecdotal evidence he saw in games.

My signature quote says it all....."I've lived through some terrible things in my life, some of which actually happened."   -  Mark Twain
I've lived through some terrible things in my life, some of which actually happened.   -  Mark Twain

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62444
  • Tommy Points: -25484
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
From the start of the season through February 26th of this past season, Boston was the top point generating team in ATO plays at 1.28 points per possession tied with Dallas.  I haven't seen data compiled for the full season, but I suspect it isn't much different than it was at the end of February.

In other words, Joe's ATO play calling was good enough to lead the league (even accounting for ORTG relativity, Boston was 5th).

This thread is full of perception that isn't borne in reality.  Actually pretty typical of internet blogs and forums in general.


https://www.basketballinsiders.com/news/nba-study-which-nba-coach-is-the-best-at-calling-plays/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3uTDcyE2VGb9fxAOfejFsHXaNnRK5M1gwG4mlv9n6AOSdzwqr6wJRTu90_aem_jIk-9Vq6ERyyH-VM4sjlHw

That's interesting, I wouldn't have expected that. TP.

Do you have similar stats for end-of-quarter plays?

It's because human beings tend to remember things that fail, or that didn't get done, rather than things that actually did. If something worked you move on to the next thing. But if someone did do something they should have done, you definitely remember it  :police:

That's probably why Brad wasn't worried about Joe to the extent the fans were...he looked at the data, rather than whatever anecdotal evidence he saw in games.

You also need to remember the nature of ATO plays.  They're not the same thing as game-winners or end of quarter shot.  An offensive possession after a timeout in the middle of the quarter counts, too.  In fact, those are probably the vast majority of ATO plays.

Therefore, it makes perfect sense that the team with the best offense in the NBA would have the best offense after a timeout is called.  That's something the authors of the article attempt to adjust for, and it leads to the Celts falling to fifth (tied).

But, ATOs are different than specific plays that are set up by the coach in crunch time, which is what the complaints seem to be about.  I think the flip side is the pre-planned "leave the ball in the star's hands" at the end of quarters / games strategy, even when a timeout isn't called (and therefore isn't encompassed under ATO plays).

People want diversity in those situations.  We've all seen the "give JT the ball to run the clock down and chuck up a buzzer 3PT miss" play, and it is definitely the team's go-to.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Offline Kernewek

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4668
  • Tommy Points: 297
  • International Superstar
Well, not the miss, but the shot, certainly.
"...unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo-realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms. I do not distrust their motives; I distrust their power. They have a lot of it."

Re: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching
« Reply #2662 on: September 13, 2024, 09:22:04 AM »

Offline green_bballers13

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 336
It's amazing to see what anxiety can do to a fanbase. This was a case study in extreme, fear based thinking. 178 pages. Brilliant.

So glad the basketball people make basketball decisions and bloggers make blog posts.

Can't wait for a another season of haters optimism.
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.

Re: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching
« Reply #2663 on: September 13, 2024, 10:10:26 AM »

Online Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32505
  • Tommy Points: 1721
  • What a Pub Should Be
It's amazing to see what anxiety can do to a fanbase. This was a case study in extreme, fear based thinking. 178 pages. Brilliant.

So glad the basketball people make basketball decisions and bloggers make blog posts.

Can't wait for a another season of haters optimism.

Seems like a pretty needless thread bump.

Some of the the stuff was clearly over the top but some of the criticism was pretty warranted. I think it's fair to critique. It's another thing to be irrational. 


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching
« Reply #2664 on: September 13, 2024, 10:47:10 AM »

Offline green_bballers13

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 336
It's amazing to see what anxiety can do to a fanbase. This was a case study in extreme, fear based thinking. 178 pages. Brilliant.

So glad the basketball people make basketball decisions and bloggers make blog posts.

Can't wait for a another season of haters optimism.

Seems like a pretty needless thread bump.

Some of the the stuff was clearly over the top but some of the criticism was pretty warranted. I think it's fair to critique. It's another thing to be irrational.

I mean, isn't sports talk needless? There's really no need for any of this expression of ideas.

I thought Joe did a decent job last year. Most of this thread is either flat out wrong or hyperbole.

Joe got unfairly hammered, and Ime was put up on a pedestal. I think it's ok to talk about.
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.

Re: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching
« Reply #2665 on: September 13, 2024, 11:37:00 AM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62444
  • Tommy Points: -25484
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
It's amazing to see what anxiety can do to a fanbase. This was a case study in extreme, fear based thinking. 178 pages. Brilliant.

So glad the basketball people make basketball decisions and bloggers make blog posts.

Can't wait for a another season of haters optimism.

Seems like a pretty needless thread bump.

Some of the the stuff was clearly over the top but some of the criticism was pretty warranted. I think it's fair to critique. It's another thing to be irrational.

I mean, isn't sports talk needless? There's really no need for any of this expression of ideas.

I thought Joe did a decent job last year. Most of this thread is either flat out wrong or hyperbole.

Joe got unfairly hammered, and Ime was put up on a pedestal. I think it's ok to talk about.

You're just trolling at this point, which is what Dons pointed out.  You're adding nothing new and saying nothing insightful.  Instead, you're bored and are trying to stir up conflict.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching
« Reply #2666 on: September 13, 2024, 11:55:15 AM »

Offline mobilija

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3058
  • Tommy Points: 735

Re: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching
« Reply #2667 on: September 13, 2024, 12:23:59 PM »

Online droopdog7

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7017
  • Tommy Points: 468
Might as well resurrect the pick swap thread too

Re: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching
« Reply #2668 on: September 13, 2024, 12:40:22 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62444
  • Tommy Points: -25484
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Might as well resurrect the pick swap thread too

Haha.  If that pick ends up being #2 overall, it was still a good trade at this point.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Fire Joe! ... or critique Joe ... or defend Joe... or worry about Joe's coaching
« Reply #2669 on: September 14, 2024, 10:43:22 AM »

Offline green_bballers13

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3308
  • Tommy Points: 336
It's amazing to see what anxiety can do to a fanbase. This was a case study in extreme, fear based thinking. 178 pages. Brilliant.

So glad the basketball people make basketball decisions and bloggers make blog posts.

Can't wait for a another season of haters optimism.

Seems like a pretty needless thread bump.

Some of the the stuff was clearly over the top but some of the criticism was pretty warranted. I think it's fair to critique. It's another thing to be irrational.

I mean, isn't sports talk needless? There's really no need for any of this expression of ideas.

I thought Joe did a decent job last year. Most of this thread is either flat out wrong or hyperbole.

Joe got unfairly hammered, and Ime was put up on a pedestal. I think it's ok to talk about.

You're just trolling at this point, which is what Dons pointed out.  You're adding nothing new and saying nothing insightful.  Instead, you're bored and are trying to stir up conflict.

Sorry if I was offensive. I thought the conversation was relevant to the Celtics. If I touched a nerve, I apologize.
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.