Author Topic: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?  (Read 11529 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« on: November 14, 2022, 06:02:49 PM »

Offline Ed Monix

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2040
  • Tommy Points: 213
  • Signature move: Punch to the jejunum
HoopsHype's Michael Scotto reported the team "never offered more than $50 million guaranteed over four years." Scotto previously reported in October the 6'6" forward was believed to be wanting a deal paying him $12-14 million annually.

Williams is now due to hit restricted free agency in the offseason. That allows the Celtics to match any offer sheet he signs, but they may not utilize that luxury when the moment arrives.

According to Scotto, Boston might balk if Williams is handed a deal worth $18 million or more from another team.
5' 10" former point guard

Career highlight: 1973-74 championship, Boston Celtics

Career lowlight: traded for a washing machine

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2022, 06:07:43 PM »

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10143
  • Tommy Points: 347
HoopsHype's Michael Scotto reported the team "never offered more than $50 million guaranteed over four years." Scotto previously reported in October the 6'6" forward was believed to be wanting a deal paying him $12-14 million annually.

Williams is now due to hit restricted free agency in the offseason. That allows the Celtics to match any offer sheet he signs, but they may not utilize that luxury when the moment arrives.

According to Scotto, Boston might balk if Williams is handed a deal worth $18 million or more from another team.

If he wants $12-$14M annually, a 4-year deal worth $50M comes fits that range (at $12.5M per year). I'd be willing to go a little higher, maybe $15M per.
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'

You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.

C.S. Lewis

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2022, 06:48:27 PM »

Offline Goldstar88

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13540
  • Tommy Points: 1711
I’d imagine that they offered him the same deal that Timelord received, which I think is more than fair. Grant is not the Talent Rob is, but he’s durable which evens the scale.
Quoting Nick from the now locked Ime thread:
Quote
At some point you have to blame the performance on the court on the players on the court. Every loss is not the coach's fault and every win isn't because of the players.

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2022, 06:51:23 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20090
  • Tommy Points: 1331
A lot of this will depend on Sam Hauser's performance this year as I see it.   Can he be consistent enough that we do not need Grant?   

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2022, 07:09:50 PM »

Offline SparzWizard

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18835
  • Tommy Points: 1119
Obviously we can't keep everyone as they want to get paid. Well, if GWill can put up solid numbers consistently then Wyc and PBS will pay him. And yes, that also depends on Hauser on whether he pans out and if he can fill the GWill role for cheap.


#FireJoe
#JTJB (Just Trade Jaylen Brown) 2022 - 2025
I am the Master of Panic.

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2022, 07:17:02 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
A lot of this will depend on Sam Hauser's performance this year as I see it.   Can he be consistent enough that we do not need Grant?   
Doubt Hauser has anything to do with it. Yeah, both can shoot threes at a high rate but Grant is a tough, versatile defender that can credibly guard some really tough bigger guys at a very good level. His tremendous strength allows him to deny position and beat up on players defensively and in a seven game playoff series that proves extremely valuable.

Grant's contract will depend on Grant's performance and demands and have nothing to do with Hauser. My guess is the team might go as high as 4 years at $15 million per year. But if Grant is looking for current Marcus Smart type money, he will be allowed to walk.

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2022, 07:27:35 PM »

Offline radiohead

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7682
  • Tommy Points: 1380
I think Grant’s excellent play is mainly due to the players around him and the system as well. He’s a role player who can very well be replaced if his asking price becomes too much. Of course we all want GWill to remain with the Cs because we saw him grow year after year to what he is now. It’ll be interesting to see how much other teams are willing to offer him.

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2022, 07:29:42 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32316
  • Tommy Points: 10098
A lot of this will depend on Sam Hauser's performance this year as I see it.   Can he be consistent enough that we do not need Grant?   
Doubt Hauser has anything to do with it. Yeah, both can shoot threes at a high rate but Grant is a tough, versatile defender that can credibly guard some really tough bigger guys at a very good level. His tremendous strength allows him to deny position and beat up on players defensively and in a seven game playoff series that proves extremely valuable.

Grant's contract will depend on Grant's performance and demands and have nothing to do with Hauser. My guess is the team might go as high as 4 years at $15 million per year. But if Grant is looking for current Marcus Smart type money, he will be allowed to walk.
I'm pretty much in agreement on this except I think if Grant has a really good year, they may match anything up to $18 mill per year.  they're not exactly loaded up front and trying to fill his space on the roster would require a trade for anyone close to comparable.  might as well sign him and keep that hole filled

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2022, 07:35:51 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 62691
  • Tommy Points: -25472
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
How does his value compare to other mid-salary guys, like Smart and White?


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2022, 07:38:30 PM »

Offline radiohead

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7682
  • Tommy Points: 1380
How does his value compare to other mid-salary guys, like Smart and White?

Another good question is if his value will increase if the Celtics win it all this year? The pressure will be there to “run it back”?

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2022, 07:39:13 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
How does his value compare to other mid-salary guys, like Smart and White?
Smart's 4/76 and White's 4/70 are hopefully not the ballpark we are looking at for Grant. I think Timelord money is more appropriate - he is less dynamic and impactful than the Timelord, but more durable
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2022, 08:09:08 PM »

Offline PAOBoston

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8134
  • Tommy Points: 535
Think they do the same thing they did with Smart. Let him hit FA and see what is out there. If someone throws crazy money at him, let him walk. If he signs for something reasonable, then great. I would not overextend to sign this guy.

I appreciate his hard work in improving his game but he has significant limitations and honestly think Cs could find a swing player elsewhere for a cheaper price. He’s good shooting the 3 but can’t really defend, rebound, or pass very well.

Ownership has already shown and unwillingness to overspend (letting TPE expire) so I don’t think they are going to throw the bag at him if he wants anything more than like $10 mil.

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2022, 10:06:22 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7375
  • Tommy Points: 570
I think someone will offer him more than they are willing to spend. I guess the anticipation is that they can find someone to deliver a sizeable percentage of what Grant does for a lot less money.  Not sure I agree. But this is the type of situation where your GM earns his money. And I trust Brad.

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2022, 10:10:39 PM »

Offline MattyIce

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2284
  • Tommy Points: 753
How does his value compare to other mid-salary guys, like Smart and White?

Another good question is if his value will increase if the Celtics win it all this year? The pressure will be there to “run it back”?

good question, let’s hope we get an answer!

Re: Celtics Undervaluing Grant?
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2022, 10:13:12 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7940
  • Tommy Points: 1033
How does his value compare to other mid-salary guys, like Smart and White?

What do you think Smart would have gotten on the open market last summer?