I see MEM more as a 42-45 win team without S Adams and B Clarke. Those two guys lift MEM to a 50-52 win type team. MEM win with depth. They are not an above average team without that depth. They are a middle of the pack team.
The Lakers are at least a 42-45 win team if not better when both AD and LeBron are available and post-trade deadline. They are probably more of a 45-48 wn team.
If MEM were healthy, I'd take them over LAL.
But without S Adams and B Clarke, they are in trouble.
Lakers are overrated I agree some what with you guys are saying...but that performance against the Wolves was soooo bad. and the lakers fans are just yapping and saying they're going to beat Memphis- if they play like that they can't beat anyteam in the west. the wolves where beyond bad they shot 13 percent in the 4th smh and till lakers needed Ot to win.
Yeah, I am not impressed with LAL either. They will lose to the first good team they come in contact with.
They are so lucky though. They have an injury hit MEM team in the first round. Then they may get SAC in the 2nd round which is a winnable series for them as well. They could get lucky and go all the way to the WCF before they meet a single good team.
That will be fool's gold though. They'll enter into the summer thinking they are contenders next year rather than just having a fluky pair of playoff matchups that made them think they are far better than they actually are. Reality will hit them hard next season in that scenario.
I hope GSW can beat SAC because I believe they'd be a much tougher team for LAL to face in the 2nd round. GSW should beat LAL. Not convinced by SAC. Not convinced by them all season. SAC have just been healthier than the rest of the west - not better. In terms of talent, SAC is a bottom 3 team out of the 8 playoff teams in the West. That is a winnable matchup for LAL.
First good team LAL meet will take them out.