0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: gouki88 on June 05, 2022, 09:18:27 PMQuote from: RockinRyA on June 05, 2022, 09:17:22 PMEven if Tatum was going for a 2 for 1 that is a bad shot. You only go for a two for one if you can get a good shot.That isn't our philosophy nor is it the philosophy of many teams. Two for one at all costs is what most teams do. It's a bit silly IMOYeah it is. Two for one at all cost is dumb. You have to make sure you get off a good shot at least. That was really forced.
Quote from: RockinRyA on June 05, 2022, 09:17:22 PMEven if Tatum was going for a 2 for 1 that is a bad shot. You only go for a two for one if you can get a good shot.That isn't our philosophy nor is it the philosophy of many teams. Two for one at all costs is what most teams do. It's a bit silly IMO
Even if Tatum was going for a 2 for 1 that is a bad shot. You only go for a two for one if you can get a good shot.
Quote from: nickagneta on June 05, 2022, 09:17:27 PMSelective enforcement to keep a guy in the game. NBA just admitted their game is jobbed.And then the knuckle-dragging commentators go "good officiating right there hurr durr!"
Selective enforcement to keep a guy in the game. NBA just admitted their game is jobbed.
I do love Jaylen going at Draymond like that. I hope the C's instigate him a few more times and see if he takes the bait
Tatum has 21 but some of his shots were just so bad. Early in the shotclock, why are you going iso and taking a long jumper/turnaround??
Warriors have 18 points off turnovers. That’s just inexcusable