I think a great Celtic comp is the guy he is going to be playing alongside...Marcus Smart.
He isn't quite the defender Smart is, but he is a bit of a better shooter and plays at a higher pace. Other than those minor things, the similarities are abundant, especially in both players abilities to positively affect a game with stuff that doesn't always show up in the box score.
Agreed. Question is, can they play together in the starting lineup? I think they cancel each other out on the offensive side of the ball. They are far too similar. We cannot afford to start 3 unreliable shooters (White, Smart, Timelord).
Was never in favour of trading Smart. I am now. I think he's become expendable after the White trade. It's a waste of talent to have a 16-million player coming off the bench.
Horford shoots worse than Smart or White.
Not just shoots worse but is also far slower, a far worse ball-handler, a worse driver and a less creative passer. White and Smart both bring much more team offense to the table due to their quickness, handles and passing ability. In addition to the shooting.
-----------------
But yeah, I agree with the general point that we still need more offense and preferably in that starting unit. I see trading Horford & picks for that player as the best option with one of Smart / White starting and the other one coming off the bench as a 6th man. That gives us 6 strong players with guys like Theis and G.Williams for further depth.
Due to the versatility of the Jays as wings or forwards and White & Smart as combo guards, the team would be able to trade for any position 1 through 4. You could build a team around a PG like Lillard, a SG like Beal, a SF like (I don't know. Hayward?), a PF like John Collins or Julius Randle and balance the lineup due to the versatility of the Jays and our combo guards.
---------------
So I would say (1) I do not view trading Smart or White as a necessity, but, (2) It is an option. I do agree that Smart is now easier to move. White is a smoother fit at PG. Less erratic (also less dynamic) more dependable.