Basketball objectives going in:
1. Adding a "Third Star"
2. Adding shooting
3. Adding a veteran (pure) PG
4. Balance the roster
5. If none of the above happen, adding assets for use this summer to aid 1, 2, 3 and / or 4
Results:
1. Survey Says? XXX
Nada surf here.
2. Survey Says? XXX
White isn't spacing the floor. Theis isn't spacing the floor. Richardson shot better than expected (especially lately), and is gone. Langford is awful, but could hit 3s at a reasonable rate, and is gone. Schroder was not really a positive or a negative here.
3. Survey Says? Push.
White is a good player, but quite similar to Smart, and not a pure PG. Schroder's a valuable 6th man PG, and was traded.
4. Survey Says? XXX
The roster is less balanced. White duplicates Smart. Richardson was first wing off bench, is now gone. Theis plays our second strongest position -- unclear whose minutes he takes. We have many open roster spots and lack depth.
5. Survey Says? XXX
We sent out our most valuable pick, a baffling future pick swap, and Richardson (nice player on an expiring as of this summer) -- only to get none of 1, 2, 3 or 4 done. We added more long term salary. Theis is not a valuable trade chip (scheme player, one of the worst offensive players in the NBA, longer contract that Richardson). White is not a major + asset to a team trading away a star / rebuilding.
=======
So, not a great grade. Add that sounds like Stevens pulled the trigger on Theis at the last minute when he couldn't get value for Schroder, and it feels knee-jerk and non-strategic. Then add that the top of the Eastern Conference seemingly ALL got better, and its less great.
Lastly, someone will say: "well we got below the lux tax". That's fine, but a) it was the first trade of the day and therefore wasn't necessitated by other moves, and b) it was an easy non-brainer move we all expected, and c) it wasn't a basketball move but a financial one. So I just give that a passing grade.
Overall, I think Stevens looks like an amateur GM today... which makes sense, since he is.