0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I seriously wonder if its part of a three-team trade that would use Beasley and the first as part of a trade for Beal. Smart doesn't make any sense for Washington, but Beasley does. He's on a good contract, proved last year he could average 20 ppg, and still has some room to grow. For a bottom-feeder, that allows the team to keep fans interested in a way that Smart's offense wouldn't.In other words, Smart helps a team vying for the playoffs, not a team that's rebuilding. Beasley helps a team that's rebuilding. If the Wizards got the following for Beal, would they consider it? 1. A 20 ppg scorer at Beal's position to replace him2. Get out of Bertans' contract3. Unprotected first from Minny and an additional first from Boston4. 2 decent prospectsCeltics would trade Smart, Horford, Nesmith, Langford (or Pritchard), and a first for Beal and BertansI think that's a reasonable trade package for Beal (i know people will disagree). The real question is whether or not the Sixers would offer Ben Simmons for Beal, because that would definitely trump that offer.
Quote from: Celtics4ever on February 04, 2022, 11:12:06 AMThey can look all they want, I would not trade Beasley for Smart.Now Smart, Richardson and Nesmith for Vanderbuilt and D'Angelo Russell and a 2nd, might get my attention if D'Angelo has matured. If he has not I'd pass. I would hate to see Richardson and Smart go. This is a countertrade you would propose so they say "no"Welcome back, haven't seen you post in long while.
They can look all they want, I would not trade Beasley for Smart.Now Smart, Richardson and Nesmith for Vanderbuilt and D'Angelo Russell and a 2nd, might get my attention if D'Angelo has matured. If he has not I'd pass. I would hate to see Richardson and Smart go. This is a countertrade you would propose so they say "no"
Marcus Smart means too much to the Celtics and the return package for him, I don’t think, will yield enough value to warrant getting rid of Marcus. It would have to be a deal that includes Marcus and other pieces with a return of a max all star talent. Marcus would be a great rebuilding piece for us should we be unable to execute the third leg of the stool. I just don’t see him being traded unless a godfather offer comes at us.
I now feel that Jaylen Brown is more likely to be traded than Marcus Smart. Not that Smart is better, obviously that's ridiculous. But because Brown's trade value is so high, and the fear that he could walk, or make a trade request early.
I checked the TWolves Reddit page and they were basically a consensus yes on Beasley/1st for Smart, but a consensus no on Beasley/Jaden for Smart. I found this interesting as people generally overrate draft picks. Is Jaden McDaniels really that good of a prospect? I guess just add him to a long list of names we missed out on in the 2020 draft.
Quote from: jambr380 on February 05, 2022, 12:47:38 PMI checked the TWolves Reddit page and they were basically a consensus yes on Beasley/1st for Smart, but a consensus no on Beasley/Jaden for Smart. I found this interesting as people generally overrate draft picks. Is Jaden McDaniels really that good of a prospect? I guess just add him to a long list of names we missed out on in the 2020 draft.NBADraft.net compared him to Jonathan Isaac coming out in the draft. I haven't seen him play but he's a PF. Not sure what his upside is
“Minnesota definitely trying to trade for Marcus Smart. But, unless they include a first-round pick or Jaden McDaniels in addition to Malik Beasley, [a deal] most likely doesn’t get done.” – @DWolfsonKSTP on @SKORNorth